notmyfault2020
Platinum Member
- Oct 7, 2022
- 6,542
- 3,210
- 893
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
your "response" does not coincide with what I saidNO EVIDENCE. Period.
Let..it..go...![]()
figures
I'm bored

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
your "response" does not coincide with what I saidNO EVIDENCE. Period.
Let..it..go...![]()
Alinksy, is that you?Nobody with any sense.
Uh-huh. Nobody with any sense believes that lie.
No..evidence. Period.your "response" does not coincide with what I said
figures
I'm bored![]()
Well let’s start with you claim that there is massive evidence of voter fraud… is this something that you read from a media source? If so, which one? Can you point to the specific evidence?![]()
SCOTUS again denies hearing 2020 election case alleging Biden, Harris, lawmakers ignored fraud
"2nd Petition denied. Moving on to plan C," petitioner Raland Brunson wrote.justthenews.com
I just don't get this. The only thing that makes sense is that the SCOTUS doesn't want to tick off Deep State.
What are your thoughts on this?
Are they afraid of being impeached or something? I just don't get it. There is massive evidence of vote fraud. Mollie Hemingway was on Fox last night (they didn't discuss the fake election she wrote a book about, though... Come to think of it Fox puzzles me also... but then maybe I shouldn't be surprised)
![]()
what does all that have to do with scotus not taking cases about obvious vote fraud?
who said otherwise?
you liberals always act like thus and so is true just to further your sicko agenda.
I have evidence and plenty of it. Too bad y'all are too afraid to look at it. But that's your cowardice and hackery... we're so surprised!!
NO EVIDENCE. Period.
Let..it..go...![]()
That was a different Court numbnutsThe SCOTUS knows it's a powder keg of political corruption and don't want to get tangled up in it. Remember how they bent over backwards to call Obamacare a tax to avoid being dragged into the fight.
That was a different Court numbnuts
Are you unaware that they make up of the Court has changed since then?Different in what way?
You are ignorant. Roe v Wade was decided by 7 Republicans picked justices and 2 democrat chosen ones...and one of the dissenting votes was from one of the two Democrats.Did i say every night? No now stop being a retard, as for Roe vs Wade, it wasnt a law by the Constitution, so if 9 liberal judges can say it is, then 9 conservative judges can say it isnt. Want to have babies executed inside or outside the womb, then have Congress , Senate and President sign a bill into law that enable stupid Marxist women to kill their babies. They are stupid, so the stupid gene wont spread that way.
No. You saw what your alt-right media masters wanted you to see. And you wanted to believe.We all saw it, you fucking retard.
This is too juvenile for me to even waste my time on.You have evidence of this crime of crimes and you are keeping it from the authorities and the courts? You do know that YOU are then committing a crime don't you? And you are also a traitor to your country and The Fat Orange Shit Giblet right?
quit insulting people.No. You saw what your alt-right media masters wanted you to see. And you wanted to believe.
Even the idiots at Fox, OANN, and Newsmax knew it was all lies.
Terrible, what people like you have sunk to.
Right Fredo.. you’re smaaat. Not dumb like they say…quit insulting people.
Some of us have a pretty good IQ, have been to college, got over a 3. gpa... read nonfiction...
I know that's hard for you to believe... or pretend to believe, I should say. You're a bunch of liars, you dims
You're a moron. Period. End of story.quit insulting people.
Some of us have a pretty good IQ, have been to college, got over a 3. gpa... read nonfiction...
I know that's hard for you to believe... or pretend to believe, I should say. You're a bunch of liars, you dims
Are you unaware that they make up of the Court has changed since then?
What would you have them do, take up the case? Then what? If they find voter fraud, do you expect them to overturn the election? No, they know that if they would find anything, it would be the death of the nation. We would be at war with each other.![]()
SCOTUS again denies hearing 2020 election case alleging Biden, Harris, lawmakers ignored fraud
"2nd Petition denied. Moving on to plan C," petitioner Raland Brunson wrote.justthenews.com
I just don't get this. The only thing that makes sense is that the SCOTUS doesn't want to tick off Deep State.
What are your thoughts on this?
Are they afraid of being impeached or something? I just don't get it. There is massive evidence of vote fraud. Mollie Hemingway was on Fox last night (they didn't discuss the fake election she wrote a book about, though... Come to think of it Fox puzzles me also... but then maybe I shouldn't be surprised)
![]()