Really...aside from degenerate gamblers and lining the owner's pockets with more money....is there a point to playing the games?
Talent evaluation in game situations seems to be the best football-based reason for having these exhibitions. If that is the case, I propose we do the following....
Turn the first two games into public scrimmages. Still have referees so they get their training in as well but instead of having a kick off then running an offense until the drive is stopped/scored then running a defense until a drive is stopped or they score; why not simply say that each team gets 60 snaps (15 alternating offense and defensive series that last 4 plays each).
In last night's game, the Jaguars got 68 offensive plays to 56 for Chicago. So the Chicago defense got 68 plays and the Jags defense got 56. Did the coaches get to see their players? Maybe; maybe not. Perhaps the J'ville coach was banking on getting more defensive series and perhaps the Chicago coach was banking on seeing his offense run more plays.
In a system where the coach is assured of 60 offensive plays and 60 defensive plays,
they can schedule when their prospects are going to be in the game. This will allow the coaches to make sure each prospect gets playing time.
The answer to your question is quite obvious.
The whole point of preseason football is so that HUGGY can break down every Seahawks preseason game for the rest of us, in great detail.
We all get the latest updates on undrafted rookies, low-tier free agents, and every other scrub and wannabe who has a snowball's chance in hell of making the Seahawks final roster.
How could NFL football get any more riveting and intense than that?
Plus, as an added bonus this season, HUGGY is including the latest updates on openly GAY football players. Apparently these players are "special", because they become sexually excited when they are showering with their teammates.