Viet Nam was no mistake other than not supporting Ho Chi Minh in the 40s once he went communist it was the right fight to make.
Final declaration, dated July 21, 1954, of the Geneva Conference on the problem of restoring peace in Indochina, in which the representatives of Cambodia, the Democratic Republic of Viet-Nam, France, Laos, the People's Republic of China, the State of Viet-Nam, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom and the United States of America took part...
4. The Conference takes note of the clauses in the agreement on the cessation of hostilities in Viet-Nam prohibiting the introduction into Viet Nam of foreign troops and military personnel as well as of all kinds of arms and munitions...
5. The Conference takes note of the clauses in the agreement on the cessation of hostilities in Viet-Nam to the effect that no military base at the disposition of a foreign state may be established in the regrouping zones of the two parties...
6. The Conference recognizes that the essential purpose of the agreement relating to Viet-Nam is to settle military questions with a view to ending hostilities and that the military demarcation line should not in any way be interpreted as constituting a political or territorial boundary...
7. In order to insure that sufficient progress in the restoration of peace has been made, and that all the necessary conditions obtain for free expression of the national will, general elections shall be held in July 1956, under the supervision of an international commission composed of representatives of the member states of the International Supervisory Commission referred to in the agreement on the cessation of hostilities. Consultations will be held on this subject between the competent representative authorities of the two zones from April 20, 1955, on wards.
Source:
from "The Department of State Bulletin
, XXXI, No. 788" (August 2, 1954), p. 164.
-----------
This page from President Eisenhower's Memoires,
Mandate for Change, page 372, shows that he believed Ho Chi Minh would have won any free election in Vietnam in 1954.
I have never talked or corresponded with a person knowledgeable in Indochinese affairs who did not agree that had elections been held as of the time of the fighting, possibly 80 per cent of the populations would have voted for the Communist Ho Chi Minh as their leader rather than Chief of State Bao Dai.
-----------
Ho Chi Minh was not blameless in this. Once he knew that the elections scheduled for 1956 would not be held in South Vietnam, he should have had them held in North Vietnam in 1956 anyway.
With the authority President Eisenhower attributed to Ho Chi Minh, Ho could have allowed a loyal opposition. He could have allowed an adversary press. He could have governed as a democratic socialist, rather than as a Communist dictator. He could have eventually united Vietnam under his leadership without a war.
That was his mistake. It does not justify ours. Vietnam was unimportant to our security and our economy. We should have left that country alone.