What is in Pandora's box?

[Dogmaphobe]

You still don't get it. The idea behind even mentioning an investigation of Biden.............WITHOUT A SHRED OF A CREDIBLE REASON FOR IT...........is to smear Biden without evidence.

Individual 1 may have failed in his efforts to get Ukraine to announce an investigation.............BUT THAT DOESN'T MATTER NOW BECAUSE TRUMPETTE'S ARE OFF AND RUNNING WITH THE IDEA...........WITHOUT BEING GIVEN ANY FACTUAL PREDICATE WHATSOEVER.

If people ignore your use of all caps, just increase the size and add color! That'll sure tell them you are important!

As to the Bidens, there is only one possible reason the cokehead son was raking in piles of cash from Burisma, and that is the influence he delivered. Papa Joe even bragged about delivering that influence by threatening funds if they did not call off an investigation of company corruption.

BTW -- I always like it when people incorporate numbers into their user names. I always wonder if it is their birth year or something else. Yours is easy to figure out, since it obviously refers to your IQ.

 

[Cellblock2429]

What could we learn from all those documents and all the witness testimony Dems are requesting?

If the evidence the Orange Fraud is obstructing was beneficial to him logic dictates he allow it to be revealed.

But every bit of documentary evidence and every witness's testimony revealed thus far shows Don's guilt.

It shows Baby Donald did exactly what he is accused of doing.

And that is why he doesn't want Pandora's box to be opened.

/----/ Why do you need more witnesses and documents? Did you forget what Adam Shytface said?
Adam Schiff: There Is "Compelling" Evidence "In Plain Sight" Of Trump-Russia Collusion at 3:45 into the interview.

 

[easyt65]

What is in Pandora's box?

Barak Obama, Hillary Clinton, Democrats, & the 2016 Election Results.....

Even before the 2016 election, trouble was afoot.....when Hillary lost in 2016, the box was opened, and that shit was unleashed on the nation. It has reeked havoc, division, violence, crime, etc....ever since.

.

 

[DOTR]

It’s ironic that Donny gets impeached for asking another nation to look into Biden’s admitted corruption.

LOL. Liberalism always requires cognitive dissonance. Its Satan's way of preparing for judgment day when he can say "oh no you had to know"

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - George Orwell, 1984

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

But every bit of documentary evidence and every witness's testimony revealed thus far shows Don's guilt.

Little early to be drinking, ain't it?

Drunk or sober, he's right. All the evidence so far reveals Trump's guilt, and the GOP-controlled Senate is determined to keep any more evidence from coming out. If you're on the side that wants less information and less evidence, you're being played for a sucker.

All the evidence so far reveals Trump's guilt,

Is that why the House wouldn't have the "whistleblower" testify, because.....evidence?

The whistleblower's report - illegally withheld from Congress by the administration - has been confirmed by testimony and the partial transcript released by the White House. If you think he would add to the evidence, please request your Senators to call him as a witness, along with Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy.

Just kidding - Trump and the Republicans don't want any more evidence or testimony. You're being played for a sucker.

The whistleblower's report - illegally withheld from Congress by the administration - has been confirmed by testimony

Hasn't been confirmed by his testimony.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath, though a certain loudmouthed crackpot has said it's not accurate. You're already being played for a sucker - no need to play stupid.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath,

So having him testify won't hurt the Dem's case? Excellent!

 

[Indeependent]

What could we learn from all those documents and all the witness testimony Dems are requesting?

If the evidence the Orange Fraud is obstructing was beneficial to him logic dictates he allow it to be revealed.

But every bit of documentary evidence and every witness's testimony revealed thus far shows Don's guilt.

It shows Baby Donald did exactly what he is accused of doing.

And that is why he doesn't want Pandora's box to be opened.

We learn that Pelosi and company were too fucking stupid to ask for stuff they could have asked for when no one could have said, “No!”.

You do know the House, as part of its inquiry, sent out subpoenas for multiple witnesses who have refused to testify, right?

Who apparently had the right to do so...right?

 

[joaquinmiller]

Drunk or sober, he's right. All the evidence so far reveals Trump's guilt, and the GOP-controlled Senate is determined to keep any more evidence from coming out. If you're on the side that wants less information and less evidence, you're being played for a sucker.

All the evidence so far reveals Trump's guilt,

Is that why the House wouldn't have the "whistleblower" testify, because.....evidence?

The whistleblower's report - illegally withheld from Congress by the administration - has been confirmed by testimony and the partial transcript released by the White House. If you think he would add to the evidence, please request your Senators to call him as a witness, along with Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy.

Just kidding - Trump and the Republicans don't want any more evidence or testimony. You're being played for a sucker.

The whistleblower's report - illegally withheld from Congress by the administration - has been confirmed by testimony

Hasn't been confirmed by his testimony.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath, though a certain loudmouthed crackpot has said it's not accurate. You're already being played for a sucker - no need to play stupid.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath,

So having him testify won't hurt the Dem's case? Excellent!

If the Rs thought calling the whistleblower would help Trump, he'd be in the Senate right now. They're afraid of more evidence. None of it will help Trump.

I don't think you get it - if you're on the side that's fighting for less information and less evidence, you're on the wrong side. You're being played.

 

[DOTR]

All the evidence so far reveals Trump's guilt,

Is that why the House wouldn't have the "whistleblower" testify, because.....evidence?

The whistleblower's report - illegally withheld from Congress by the administration - has been confirmed by testimony and the partial transcript released by the White House. If you think he would add to the evidence, please request your Senators to call him as a witness, along with Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy.

Just kidding - Trump and the Republicans don't want any more evidence or testimony. You're being played for a sucker.

The whistleblower's report - illegally withheld from Congress by the administration - has been confirmed by testimony

Hasn't been confirmed by his testimony.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath, though a certain loudmouthed crackpot has said it's not accurate. You're already being played for a sucker - no need to play stupid.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath,

So having him testify won't hurt the Dem's case? Excellent!

If the Rs thought calling the whistleblower would help Trump, he'd be in the Senate right now. They're afraid of more evidence. None of it will help Trump.

I don't think you get it - if you're on the side that's fighting for less information and less evidence, you're on the wrong side. You're being played.

No information ever came out of a leftist propaganda circus.

 

[The Original Tree]

All the evidence so far reveals Trump's guilt,

Is that why the House wouldn't have the "whistleblower" testify, because.....evidence?

The whistleblower's report - illegally withheld from Congress by the administration - has been confirmed by testimony and the partial transcript released by the White House. If you think he would add to the evidence, please request your Senators to call him as a witness, along with Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy.

Just kidding - Trump and the Republicans don't want any more evidence or testimony. You're being played for a sucker.

The whistleblower's report - illegally withheld from Congress by the administration - has been confirmed by testimony

Hasn't been confirmed by his testimony.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath, though a certain loudmouthed crackpot has said it's not accurate. You're already being played for a sucker - no need to play stupid.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath,

So having him testify won't hurt the Dem's case? Excellent!

If the Rs thought calling the whistleblower would help Trump, he'd be in the Senate right now. They're afraid of more evidence. None of it will help Trump.

I don't think you get it - if you're on the side that's fighting for less information and less evidence, you're on the wrong side. You're being played.

When they vote on Witnesses, if they even get to that, and if they can get Schiff to quit illegally with holding documents about his contacts with Vindman through Vindman's brother on Schiff's Staff who arranged leaks, and spying, and the filing of false whistleblower reports, then you will see Erica Ciaramella, testify. Same with Joe and Hunter Biden.

But as it stands, THIS THREAD IS OFFICIALLY DEAD!

Vindman Outted as a Russian Spy!!!

 

[joaquinmiller]

It’s ironic that Donny gets impeached for asking another nation to look into Biden’s admitted corruption.

LOL. Liberalism always requires cognitive dissonance. Its Satan's way of preparing for judgment day when he can say "oh no you had to know"

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - George Orwell, 1984

View attachment 302265

"What you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening". - Donald John Trump

 

[joaquinmiller]

The whistleblower's report - illegally withheld from Congress by the administration - has been confirmed by testimony and the partial transcript released by the White House. If you think he would add to the evidence, please request your Senators to call him as a witness, along with Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy.

Just kidding - Trump and the Republicans don't want any more evidence or testimony. You're being played for a sucker.

The whistleblower's report - illegally withheld from Congress by the administration - has been confirmed by testimony

Hasn't been confirmed by his testimony.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath, though a certain loudmouthed crackpot has said it's not accurate. You're already being played for a sucker - no need to play stupid.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath,

So having him testify won't hurt the Dem's case? Excellent!

If the Rs thought calling the whistleblower would help Trump, he'd be in the Senate right now. They're afraid of more evidence. None of it will help Trump.

I don't think you get it - if you're on the side that's fighting for less information and less evidence, you're on the wrong side. You're being played.

No information ever came out of a leftist propaganda circus.

You've been completely played. Played out. You're on the side that wants less evidence.

 

[Olde Europe]

It’s ironic that Donny gets impeached for asking another nation to look into Biden’s admitted corruption.

Seriously, Gipper, is that your understanding of what happened, and is happening now?

No surprise here, though:

Winner x 5
JGalt
The Breeze
Norman
andaronjim
progressive hunter

Agree x 3
Sunni Man
WillHaftawaite
BuckToothMoron

Funny and Agree!! x 1
Gdjjr

 

[joaquinmiller]

It’s ironic that Donny gets impeached for asking another nation to look into Biden’s admitted corruption.

Seriously, Gipper, is that your understanding of what happened, and is happening now?

No surprise here, though:

Winner x 5
JGalt
The Breeze
Norman
andaronjim
progressive hunter

Agree x 3
Sunni Man
WillHaftawaite
BuckToothMoron

Funny and Agree!! x 1
Gdjjr

Each and every one a rugged individualist in his own mind.

 

[DOTR]

The whistleblower's report - illegally withheld from Congress by the administration - has been confirmed by testimony

Hasn't been confirmed by his testimony.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath, though a certain loudmouthed crackpot has said it's not accurate. You're already being played for a sucker - no need to play stupid.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath,

So having him testify won't hurt the Dem's case? Excellent!

If the Rs thought calling the whistleblower would help Trump, he'd be in the Senate right now. They're afraid of more evidence. None of it will help Trump.

I don't think you get it - if you're on the side that's fighting for less information and less evidence, you're on the wrong side. You're being played.

No information ever came out of a leftist propaganda circus.

You've been completely played. Played out. You're on the side that wants less evidence.

Is that another way of saying im on the winning side?

 

[joaquinmiller]

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath, though a certain loudmouthed crackpot has said it's not accurate. You're already being played for a sucker - no need to play stupid.

It has been confirmed by those witnesses who testified under oath. It hasn't been disputed by anyone under oath,

So having him testify won't hurt the Dem's case? Excellent!

If the Rs thought calling the whistleblower would help Trump, he'd be in the Senate right now. They're afraid of more evidence. None of it will help Trump.

I don't think you get it - if you're on the side that's fighting for less information and less evidence, you're on the wrong side. You're being played.

No information ever came out of a leftist propaganda circus.

You've been completely played. Played out. You're on the side that wants less evidence.

Is that another way of saying im on the winning side?

Read it any way you want. Your post supposes the Bolton, Mulvaney and Duffy testimonies would be leftist propaganda. That's a bit of trollish stupidity. You're on the side that wants less testimony and less evidence. There's never a good argument for that.

 

[Olde Europe]

Each and every one a rugged individualist in his own mind.

Yep, each and every one on their very own, independently, arrived at the exact same conclusion, namely, the Donny turned to a country so notoriously corrupt they might actually start the politically motivated investigations this very same Donny couldn't hope to get started at home. All the while Yermak schools American officials on the dos and don'ts of corruption in public office. And then, irony abounding, Donny Impeached is being impeached for it.

That is so, maddeningly, after months of debate, months of arguments detailing how insane it all is. Now, you might dismiss the nitwits listed above as, well, nitwits, until you realize Trump's defense team, Cipollone at the helm, and on the taxpayers' dime, pursues a defense strategy based in relevant part on this exact same boneheaded bullshit.

 

[blackhawk]

 

[joaquinmiller]

Each and every one a rugged individualist in his own mind.

Yep, each and every one on their very own, independently, arrived at the exact same conclusion, namely, the Donny turned to a country so notoriously corrupt they might actually start the politically motivated investigations this very same Donny couldn't hope to get started at home. All the while Yermak schools American officials on the dos and don'ts of corruption in public office. And then, irony abounding, Donny Impeached is being impeached for it.

That is so, maddeningly, after months of debate, months of arguments detailing how insane it all is. Now, you might dismiss the nitwits listed above as, well, nitwits, until you realize Trump's defense team, Cipollone at the helm, and on the taxpayers' dime, pursues a defense strategy based in relevant part on this exact same boneheaded bullshit.

All while theoretically-sworn-impartial-jurists carry Trump's water:

Both Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Rep. Mark Meadows of North Carolina said they'd urge Trump to invoke executive privilege if Bolton were called -- and several Republicans expected Trump to take that tack for any of the four witnesses the Democrats want.
"Executive privilege is a very important separation of powers issue here, and I don't want to see the presidency weakened," Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson told CNN on Thursday. "Do we want to stretch that thing out for months? You know, going through legal process because the President will, and should, challenge those types of subpoenas."

If Trump won't invoke executive privilege, R Senators want to do it for him.

Senate GOP uses Trump's executive privilege threat as rallying cry against subpoenas - CNNPolitics

 

[Crixus]

What could we learn from all those documents and all the witness testimony Dems are requesting?

If the evidence the Orange Fraud is obstructing was beneficial to him logic dictates he allow it to be revealed.

But every bit of documentary evidence and every witness's testimony revealed thus far shows Don's guilt.

It shows Baby Donald did exactly what he is accused of doing.

And that is why he doesn't want Pandora's box to be opened.

What is Pandoras Box? Well, Pandora was a hooker in TJ and her box was Legendary.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Senate GOP uses Trump's executive privilege threat as rallying cry against subpoenas - CNNPolitics

That feels a lot like, 'now we don't have time to count the votes'.