What if Trump -is- a fascist?

[M14 Shooter]

Nope.

Ah. You cannot support your position.
Concession accepted.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Are you worried the deers are gonna shoot back?

"Deers"

 

[Lesh]

Congress declares war, the president doesn't. So yes, Congress is responsible for wars.

We haven't declared war since WWII.

and yet we have been involved in many wars since WW II. I guess you’re wrong

 

[Arlette]

Ah. You cannot support your position.
Concession accepted.

It was explained to you in post #191

 

[M14 Shooter]

It was explained to you in post #191

You're just restating your claim, which, of course, proves nothing.
You cannot soundly demonstrate the necessity for, or efficacy of, banning "weapons of war".
And, you still have not told us how "A very small number of people would deal with Trump".

 

[Arlette]

You're just restating your claim, which, of course, proves nothing.
You cannot soundly demonstrate the necessity for, or efficacy of, banning "weapons of war".
And, you still have not told us how "A very small number of people would deal with Trump".

You never made the case of why we supposedly need weapons of war on the street.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You never made the case of why we supposedly need weapons of war on the street.

We're discussing YOUR claim.
You can soundly demonstrate the necessity for, or efficacy of, banning "weapons of war" - or, you can't.
Looks like you lean towards "can't", and you know it.

And, you still have not told us how "A very small number of people would deal with Trump".

 

[Arlette]

We're discussing YOUR claim.
You can soundly demonstrate the necessity for, or efficacy of, banning "weapons of war" - or, you can't.
Looks like you lean towards "can't", and you know it.

And, you still have not told us how "A very small number of people would deal with Trump".

Too many mass shootings involving your weapons of war. Duh

 

[M14 Shooter]

Too many mass shootings involving your weapons of war. Duh

You speak from ignorance or dishonesty.

2023: The truth about mass shootings and the AR-15

Mass shootings as defined by: Mass Shootings in 2023 | Gun Violence Archive Supplemental / detailed information from: US mass shootings, 1982–2023: Data from Mother Jones’ investigation Total mass shootings: 651 Total killed, mass shootings: 706 Average killed per mass shooting: 1.08 % mass...

www.usmessageboard.com

Summary:
2023: Of the more than 20,000,000 AR15s in the US; 6 were used in mass shootings to kill 42 people
2024: Of the more than 20,000,000 AR15s in the US; 1 has been used used in mass shootings so far this year to kill 4 people

Thus:
-Your have no factual or rational basis for your claim.
-You cannot soundly demonstrate the necessity for, or efficacy of, banning "weapons of war"

And, you still have not told us how "A very small number of people would deal with Trump".

 

[M14 Shooter]

See?

You got nuthin', and you know it.

And, you still have not told us how "A very small number of people would deal with Trump".

 

[hadit]

and yet we have been involved in many wars since WW II. I guess you’re wrong

I'm not wrong. They call it a bunch of other terms to avoid saying it's war, but Congress is responsible for wars. Maybe they need to step up and take their responsibility instead of letting the president attack a country, then come in after the fact.

 

[Lesh]

I'm not wrong. They call it a bunch of other terms to avoid saying it's war, but Congress is responsible for wars. Maybe they need to step up and take their responsibility instead of letting the president attack a country, then come in after the fact.

So if Congress is responsible for wars… how have we managed to be involved in so many since WW II?

 

[M14 Shooter]

I'm not wrong. They call it a bunch of other terms to avoid saying it's war, but Congress is responsible for wars. Maybe they need to step up and take their responsibility instead of letting the president attack a country, then come in after the fact.

Blame the Democrats and the War Powers Act.
Nixon tried to veto it, but they over-rode.

 

[hadit]

So if Congress is responsible for wars… how have we managed to be involved in so many since WW II?

They are responsible for DECLARING war. They have abdicated that responsibility and allowed the president to simply send troops and arms into battle without any declaration of war. They have bought into the continual war model and are trying to duck blame for it. Even in Iraq, they voted, NOT to declare war, but to allow the PRESIDENT to send the military into the conflict.

 

[hadit]

Blame the Democrats and the War Powers Act.
Nixon tried to veto it, but they over-rode.

They're using it for political cover and to avoid debating the merits of going to war. This way they can either carp from the sidelines or cheer, depending on how the battles are going and their constituents feel without having their names attached to a formal declaration. No one can come back them and say, "You are to blame for this".

 

[Curried Goats]

There's desire and then there's capability. Trump might desire to be a dictator but him and his frail white sycophants don't have the capability. Guns or no guns. You'd think they'd of learned that when they discovered the difference between storming the Capitol and taking the Capitol but morons are going to moron.

 

[Cellblock2429]

You can stop this hiperaly at any time. It's not all weapons, only the one most likely to be used in a mass murder of students in the schools.

/—-/ Do you not understand the difference between semi automatic and fully automatic?
In the Revolution and civil wars 300 soldiers would line up and fire a volley of single shot rifles and wipe out, even vaporize 200 enemy soldiers.
Get a clue will ya.

 

[Vrenn]

Right.
The "weapons of war".

If you truly believe you face the very real prospect of an authoritarian fascist dictator taking power, why are you so keen on taking "weapons of war" off the streets?

In this case, you are attempting to hide the fact that tRump is a fascist and your Weapons of War doesn't even enter into the equation.

 

[M14 Shooter]

It's not all weapons, only the one most likely to be used in a mass murder of students in the schools.

This is a lie.

 

[hadit]

In this case, you are attempting to hide the fact that tRump is a fascist and your Weapons of War doesn't even enter into the equation.

Let us know when you actually start posting facts.