gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 72,793
- 39,448
- 2,605
Imo, the only chance for some political compromise really passed with Buchanan. The South believed they'd never see a friendly potus and have senate majority again.
I do not believe that. The entire western world eliminated slavery peacefully, except the USA. Now how the hell does that happen? In fact, slavery was outlawed in several Northern states a few years before the Civil War and no war resulted.
The fact is the war WAS NEVER ABOUT SLAVERY. It was about POWER AND WEALTH...and centralizing it in Washington DC under the total and complete authority of the Republican Party.
There were terrible extremists on both sides who desired war. Had Lincoln been a real leader and statesman in the mold of Jefferson, he would have sought a compromise. Lincoln NEVER sought a compromise. He wanted war and he got it.
His philosophy can be summed simply as "Pay up or die."
And you see, I don't think Lincoln did want war. It is precisely because he saw himself as a representative of the people and not a dictator that he refused to do anything about slavery, a constitutional reality, even though opposed it personally. He saw his role as one to find ways to compromise being opposing factions in the country.
He was a segregationist, however, and did not want all the southern black people to flee north. And it was that which prompted the Emancipation Proclamation after the war was already underway.
I know that isn't the romantic version of history, but I do believe it is the accurate one.
But all that is sort of beside the point. The interesting component of the OP is how the two countries might have gotten along just fine side by side if Lincoln and the Union Congress had chosen to allow the secession rather than try to forcibly reverse it.
Lincoln did not WANT war...agreed, but he was fully prepared to prosecute a war against fellow Americans (and he approved of TOTAL war methods against Americans, killing over 50k civilians and destroying enormous amounts of private property) to impose his will. Completely in contradiction to Jeffersonian principles, but very much in line with Hamiltonian principles. He was a statist first and foremost....not unlike most of our recent presidents and certainly very much like the current occupant.
He also absolutely refused to compromise or negotiate with the South. His bastardized view of the Constitution, which he repeatedly breached, while claiming to abide by it, allowed him to wrongly believe the states did not have the right to secede.
Lincoln, like many in the North and South, thought the war would be over in weeks or a few months. When it dragged on, he waged total war on fellow Americans.
IMHO he should have been impeached and he should be despised by all Americans today.
Last edited: