What If Kamala Knows Whereof She Speaks???

I've always honored the wise Yogi,....
'It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future.'


But......the dunce who got 2% of the Democrat vote before they selected here as VP.....might be one of those squirrels who finally found an acorn:


"Flashback: Kamala Harris Predicts What Happens in Virginia Will Determine the Future of the National Democrat Party [OOPS!]

Kamala Harris’ prediction Virginia is a ‘bellwether’ for 2022 and 2024 bites Dems in the donkey​

November 3, 2021 | Terresa Monroe-Hamilton | Print Article
FacebookTwitterRedditLinkedInGab

Powered by Topple
Vice President Kamala Harris is no doubt regretting her prediction that what happens in the Virginia gubernatorial race will largely determine what happens in the 2022 midterm elections and in the 2024 presidential election after Virginia turned red on Tuesday."
she’s right. VA a deep blue state going back generations, that has had some recent GOP moves, but looked like it was turning solid blue like it was for decades, is a carney in a coal mine for dnc.

The radicals have taken over the party and the people are rejecting their tyranny. VA’s motto says it all
 
I guess in the short run, you dont give a fuck about the poor and lower middle class and how the prices are going to hurt them and their families...Typical of a Socialist asshole.
Don't be a whiney little bitch. Lots of things are bad in the short term, but do not last long. That is why it is called the short term. Sorry, but government is not the answer to all short-term problems (nor even the reason), nor do I get excited about the temporary small ups and downs. Just can't spare the emotion for it, but will watch you cry your eyes out for people you have only heard about, but only limitedly experienced, and do not have much understanding or insight on the subject. At my age, I have seen it before and got through it before, so can't get too excited over it.
 
Let's see....how long has this 'temporary' inflation been so far?
Do you think the poor and lower middle class can afford 4 dollars a pound for ground beef? Oh, yeah, they should be eating vegan, because progressives dont like cows. When you piss off the poor, things like this happen.

 
Don't be a whiney little bitch. Lots of things are bad in the short term, but do not last long. That is why it is called the short term. Sorry, but government is not the answer to all short-term problems (nor even the reason), nor do I get excited about the temporary small ups and downs. Just can't spare the emotion for it, but will watch you cry your eyes out for people you have only heard about, but only limitedly experienced, and do not have much understanding or insight on the subject. At my age, I have seen it before and got through it before, so can't get too excited over it.
Dude i saw the gasoline lines back in the 1970s when Jimmy the Peanut Carter said that oil was going to run out in 10 years. I saw the bread go up 500% because of it, and my family had to struggle just to make ends meet. So fuck off, you prog asshole, just because you are doing "fine" in your "whiteness", maybe you need a little visit from BLM/ANTIFA.

 
Dude i saw the gasoline lines back in the 1970s when Jimmy the Peanut Carter said that oil was going to run out in 10 years. I saw the bread go up 500% because of it, and my family had to struggle just to make ends meet. So fuck off, you prog asshole, just because you are doing "fine" in your "whiteness", maybe you need a little visit from BLM/ANTIFA.


How long did it last? A few weeks, a few months before the oil embargo eased? Cannot say I have ever seen bread go up 500%, certainly not in the 70s or during a period of inflation (like now) in my lifetime. I'll tell you point-blank how my family got by back then, I cheated and took a second job. I know a lot of people don't want to work right now, but it's just kind of tough if you don't want to work, but still want stuff, like food, cable TV and a house or apartment to stay in. It ain't fun sometimes, but nobody ever told you, it was going to be fun all the time. Buck up and deal with it.
 
2. After promising that Iran would never get nuclear weapons, Obama guaranteed them nukes.
And that is a deliberate lie this time! The 5+1 agreement on Iran's use of nuclear energy was ensuring that Iran wouldn't enrich uranium to nuclear weapon capability.

Trump destroyed that agreement and that lessened US influence on the issue to the point at which Iran doesn't need to bargain a new deal.

Biden's hands are tied because Iran won credibility with the other parties to the agreement.
Russia and China will never agree to a deal that was as strong as the previous one.

This now leaves the US and the Zionist apartheid regime with bombing Iran being the only option. Hardly an option at all now that Iran has the backing of China and Russia and the Zionist regime would be left with a country that's a smoking parking lot if it ever resorts to the use of tactical nuclear weapons. And now fwiw, the world's greatest danger of nuclear war!

America's and the Zionists' reign of terror is over now, except for the two raining death down on the Palestinian people, which may never end unless the Zionists are eliminated.

As with N.K., Iran will most likely compromise it's religious position in favour of safety from US/zionist aggression hon.

 
she’s right. VA a deep blue state going back generations, that has had some recent GOP moves, but looked like it was turning solid blue like it was for decades, is a carney in a coal mine for dnc.

The radicals have taken over the party and the people are rejecting their tyranny. VA’s motto says it all


That Red-Blue thing that the state media has imposed is like fingernails on a blackboard.



We are blue, they are red.



Red is traditionally associated with
socialism and communism. The oldest symbol of socialism (and, by extension, communism) is the Red Flag, which dates back to the revolutions of 1848. The colour red was chosen to represent the blood of the workers who died in the struggle against capitalism. All major socialist and communist alliances and organisations – including the First, Second, and Third Internationals – used red as their official colour. The association between the colour red and communism is particularly strong. Communists use red much more often and more extensively than other ideologies use their respective traditional colours.







In the United States, since the year 2000, the mass media have associated red with the Republican Party, despite the fact that the Republican Party is a conservative-leaning party. Since at least 2010, the party has adopted an all red logo.

Political colour - Wikipedia





"The choice of colors in this divide is counter-intuitive to many international observers, as throughout the world, red is commonly the designated color for parties representing labor, socialist, and/or liberal interests [5] [6], which in the United States would be more closely correlated with the Democratic Party. Similarly, blue is used in these countries to depict conservative parties which in the case of the United States would be a color more suitable for the Republicans. For example, in Canada party colors are deeply ingrained and historic and have been unchanged during the Twentieth Century. Red states and blue states - Wikipedia







The Democrats should be Gray….reminiscent of the outfits they wore when they were the Confederacy, going to war to maintain slavery, and we’re Blue….the color we wore when we pried their slaves away from them.

Justice will not be on the upswing until the true color scheme is put back in place.
 
Don't be a whiney little bitch. Lots of things are bad in the short term, but do not last long. That is why it is called the short term. Sorry, but government is not the answer to all short-term problems (nor even the reason), nor do I get excited about the temporary small ups and downs. Just can't spare the emotion for it, but will watch you cry your eyes out for people you have only heard about, but only limitedly experienced, and do not have much understanding or insight on the subject. At my age, I have seen it before and got through it before, so can't get too excited over it.

"Lots of things are bad in the short term, but do not last long."

One can only hope you are correct.


1636022933561.png
 
Do you think the poor and lower middle class can afford 4 dollars a pound for ground beef? Oh, yeah, they should be eating vegan, because progressives dont like cows. When you piss off the poor, things like this happen.




Maybe we should eat the Democrats????
 
And that is a deliberate lie this time! The 5+1 agreement on Iran's use of nuclear energy was ensuring that Iran wouldn't enrich uranium to nuclear weapon capability.

Trump destroyed that agreement and that lessened US influence on the issue to the point at which Iran doesn't need to bargain a new deal.

Biden's hands are tied because Iran won credibility with the other parties to the agreement.
Russia and China will never agree to a deal that was as strong as the previous one.

This now leaves the US and the Zionist apartheid regime with bombing Iran being the only option. Hardly an option at all now that Iran has the backing of China and Russia and the Zionist regime would be left with a country that's a smoking parking lot if it ever resorts to the use of tactical nuclear weapons. And now fwiw, the world's greatest danger of nuclear war!

America's and the Zionists' reign of terror is over now, except for the two raining death down on the Palestinian people, which may never end unless the Zionists are eliminated.

As with N.K., Iran will most likely compromise it's religious position in favour of safety from US/zionist aggression hon.

"And that is a deliberate lie this time!"

I never lie, and I'm never wrong.




After promising that Iran would never get nuclear weapons, Obama guaranteed them nukes.

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table"


....contrary to all of his promises not to do so, and in contravention of the non-proliferation agreement that is our policy, Hussein Obama guaranteed nuclear weapons to Iran....and you can't see a problem with that.



Gads, you're an imbecile







1. NPR wrote that they were restricted for 10 years:

"Perhaps the biggest unknown is what happens to that breakout time once some of the terms of this deal start to expire 10 and 15 years from now.

In an interview with NPR after the framework of this agreement was reached, President Obama conceded that "at that point the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero."

But this deal, Obama argued at the time, buys the United States at least a decade."
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal



"Obama Gave Iran A Faster Route To A Nuke -- And Didn't Tell Us
President Obama's deal with Iran was supposed to keep that nation's mullahs from creating a nuclear weapon with which it could intimidate and dominate the Mideast and much of Europe. Instead, it actually makes it more possible -- and in shorter time.

The Associated Press obtained a copy of a secret side deal that, in the words of the normally circumspect AP, advances "Tehran's ability to build a bomb even before the end of the pact." The accord as agreed to by the U.S. and five other nations was supposed to last 15 years. Or so we were told. Turns out, that's not the case.


...the deal as signed all but guarantees that Iran will someday get a nuclear weapon with which to terrorize its neighbors. What the AP document does is move up the time under which Iran can make a nuclear weapon. So we'll all be at risk sooner than we think.

The so-called "add-on" agreement lets Iran expand its uranium enrichment program after 10 years -- not 15 years, as the public parts of the deal suggested."
Obama Gave Iran A Faster Route To A Nuke -- And Didn't Tell Us | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD




And that was written years ago.


2. There was never....NEVER....any reason to allow the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.


3. The sanctions were strangling them.

This from the Left-leaning Brookings Institute...

"....the sanctions against Iran — and the context for them internationally and within Iran — have changed dramatically. Since 2010, the sanctions’ impact on Iran has been severe: its oil exports and revenues plummeted; the value of its currency eroded; trade disruptions shuttered businesses and exacerbated inflation. Quietly, a backlash emerged among Iran’s political elites against the country’s creeping isolation, and the June 2013 presidential election ushered in a moderate new president and the beginnings of a diplomatic breakthrough on the nuclear crisis — achievements that most observers attribute to the impact of sanctions."
Why “Iran Style” Sanctions Worked Against Tehran (And Why They Might Not Succeed with Moscow)



4. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.







5. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia


"war criminal.... a person who transgresses moral or civil law"
war criminal









Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.





not countenance
See: disapprove, enjoin, reject




Then he guaranteed them getting nukes,......and paid them to do it!!!!!!!


Barack Obama was ushering in the age of the ‘Iranian Nuclear Bomb’ and fueling Iran’s war machine.

Barack Obama, the #1 funder of radical Islamic fundamentalism and of the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, in the history of the world.



Under Hussein Obama, the United States was the lead benefactor of Islamic terrorism

He gave his nod to ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons for 7th century barbarians.


Barack Obama, in addition to slowing the rise of the oceans, also made the world a safer place to be by funding the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism while not restricting their ballistic missile program and, at the same time, supporting Hezbollah.


The best friend the homicidal maniacs in charge of Iran ever had was Barack Hussein Obama.

The big question about Hussein Obama was always was he Sunni or Shia…and with the Iran deal, we got answer.
 
"And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon.
Another lie!
What you said was, is that we will not countenance...................
Or was it, What you said is, was that we will not countenance.............?
 
More kookery from PC :)

  • Overall, we rate Bizpac Review Right Biased based on story selection and editorial position that almost always favor the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sources, misleading loaded language, and three failed fact checks.
 
Another lie!
What you said was, is that we will not countenance...................
Or was it, What you said is, was that we will not countenance.............?


Oh....I remember you!!!

The spokesperson for this:


"CANADA'S GENEROSITY GAP​

Manitoba is Canada's most generous province for the 10th year in a row, but Americans continue to be far more generous than Canadians, according to an annual report on generosity released by the Fraser Institute.

Quebec ranks last among Canadian provinces in terms of generosity with 21.9 percent of tax filers claiming charitable donations and donating only 0.33 percent of aggregate income.

Compared to Americans, however, Canadians are far less generous:

At the national level, the United States surpasses Canada with 26.6 percent of U.S. tax filers donating to charity compared to 24.0 percent of Canadian tax filers.

Further, Americans gave 1.60 percent of their aggregate personal income to charity, more than double the 0.73 percent that Canadians donated to charity."
http://www.fraserinstitute.org/newsandevents/news/7081.aspx

For report:

http://www.fraserinstitute.org/researchandpublications/publications/7071.aspx

For more on Social Issues:

http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=28
 
Justice will not be on the upswing until the true color scheme is put back in place.
Better red than dead!
Did you make that up all by yourself? Check out the latest news on Igor Danchenko! I'll explain it for you tomorrow.
 
Better red than dead!
Did you make that up all by yourself? Check out the latest news on Igor Danchenko! I'll explain it for you tomorrow.


"Better red than dead!"


You foreigners are so jealous of this country, and really resent those of us who are Americans.

Do us all a favor and stay where you are, commie.
 
Compared to Americans, however, Canadians are far less generous:
This is true and has always been true for countries that recognize the need for socially responsible government. We pay in taxes to look after all Canadians and that distributed the load more evenly.
It's a matter of pride to be able to say that we look after all our people, not shame.
You'll understand that as an American with your people dying for lack of good affordable health care for one instance.
Or your shortened life expectancy, or your higher infant mortality rate. Or your high rate of medical toursim, or you outrageous pharmaceutical prices.
Or, ............. and or .................... A million deaths to Covid, or ................. US income inequality setting world records............

I think Americans don't really like people very much. The poor who would benefit from socially responsible government would probably be mostly black. or............ racism.

Why are you so disagreeable all the time?
What's your hurt hon?
 
This is true and has always been true for countries that recognize the need for socially responsible government. We pay in taxes to look after all Canadians and that distributed the load more evenly.
It's a matter of pride to be able to say that we look after all our people, not shame.
You'll understand that as an American with your people dying for lack of good affordable health care for one instance.
Or your shortened life expectancy, or your higher infant mortality rate. Or your high rate of medical toursim, or you outrageous pharmaceutical prices.
Or, ............. and or .................... A million deaths to Covid, or ................. US income inequality setting world records............

I think Americans don't really like people very much. The poor who would benefit from socially responsible government would probably be mostly black. or............ racism.

Why are you so disagreeable all the time?
What's your hurt hon?
you don't look after people....you give money to your Govt and expect someone else to

Govt is not a charity...someone in Washington DC has no idea about the needs of the person in the small town, and what they might need to get back on their feet
 
This is true and has always been true for countries that recognize the need for socially responsible government. We pay in taxes to look after all Canadians and that distributed the load more evenly.
It's a matter of pride to be able to say that we look after all our people, not shame.
You'll understand that as an American with your people dying for lack of good affordable health care for one instance.
Or your shortened life expectancy, or your higher infant mortality rate. Or your high rate of medical toursim, or you outrageous pharmaceutical prices.
Or, ............. and or .................... A million deaths to Covid, or ................. US income inequality setting world records............

I think Americans don't really like people very much. The poor who would benefit from socially responsible government would probably be mostly black. or............ racism.

Why are you so disagreeable all the time?
What's your hurt hon?


This is true for those who talk a good game, but are content to let someone else actually take care of the needy.
Just what one should expect from a Leftist.

1636057295826.png
 
This is true for those who talk a good game, but are content to let someone else actually take care of the needy.
Just what one should expect from a Leftist.
Canada's poor are taken care of much better than America's poor. That's the most important consideration by far for me.
Canada's leftists and rightists agree on this position.

We'll have to agree to disagree on how we consider, or don't consider, our citizens lives as important.
I do keep in mind that your feelings have to be sympathetic to a bigger proportion of black people than mine hon.
 
Canada's poor are taken care of much better than America's poor. That's the most important consideration by far for me.
Canada's leftists and rightists agree on this position.

We'll have to agree to disagree on how we consider, or don't consider, our citizens lives as important.
I do keep in mind that your feelings have to be sympathetic to a bigger proportion of black people than mine hon.


You claim to be a communist.....and history has revealed how your sort treat citizens.


Gulags, concentration camps...........



Internment Camps in Canada during the First and Second World​

https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca › politics-government › Pages




Jun 28, 2021 — Because Canada also served as a place of detention for German prisoners of war on behalf of the British, they formed a large proportion of the ...
List of camps - First World War · ‎Other Records - First World War

PM, health officials warn Canadians against believing COVID ...​

https://www.cbc.ca › news › politics › covid-19-intern...




Oct 20, 2020 — Canadians will not be forced into COVID-19 internment or containment camps, a spokesperson for Health Minister Patty Hajdu said Tuesday ...

Canadian Internment Camps Archives - Musée de l ...​

https://museeholocauste.ca › categories_objects › canadi...




He wrote it between June and October 1941 when he was a guard in an internment camp near Sherbrooke, Quebec. A Guard at an Internment Camp in Canada. Diary that ...


Canadian Internment Camps | Petawawa Heritage Village​

https://www.petawawaheritagevillage.com › history › ca...




Camp 33 - Petawawa In December 1914 a Prisoner of War (POW) Internment Camp opened at Camp Petawawa housing 750 German, Austrian and Italian POWs.
 

Forum List

Back
Top