What Have You Done?

[Uncensored2008]

[
There is little question the Great Obama is the best President in 50 years

Well, that is about as true as most of what you post.

Of course the next time you tell the truth will be the first time, as we all know.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Almost every single abortion in this country is for nothing more than convenience.

Is your opposition to abortion based on Christian religion?

Is your utter disregard for human life based on the fact you are a Stalinist?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Repeating that lie will not alter the fact that it is a lie. doper boi.

Nazism is a totalitarian system where the state controls the means of production, no different than what democrats promote for America.

The Nazi state did not control the means of production.

Please don't lie.

{
However, there is no doubt that work was created. The Nazis introduced public work schemes for men who worked in the National Labour Service (Reichsarbeitsdienst or RAD). Their work would have included digging ditches on farms to assist irrigation, building the new autobahns, planting new forests etc. The men of the RAD wore a military style uniform, lived in camps near to where they were working and received only what we would term pocket money. However, compared to the lack of success of the Weimar governmentand the chronic misery of 1931 to 1932, these men felt that at least the Nazi government was making the effort to improve their lot.

To ‘protect’ those in work, the German Labour Front was set up. This was lead by Robert Ley. The GLF took the role of trade unions which had been banned. To an extent, the GLF did this. Ley ordered that workers could not be sacked on the spot but he also ordered that a worker could not leave his job without the government’s permission. Only government labour exchanges could arrange for a new job if someone did leave his employment.

However, the GLF increased the number of hours worked from 60 to 72 per week (including overtime) by 1939. Strikes were outlawed. The average factory worker was earning 10 times more than those on dole money and few complained – though to do so was fraught with potential difficulties.}

The Nazis and the German Economy - History Learning Site

The state had 100% control of the economy after 1938.

Labor force is not a "means of production".

The Nazi government followed the form of socialism that Mussolini laid out. Government stooges ran state approved corporations which followed state designated production goals for state mandated products.

The Nazi regime had 100% control of the means of production.

I already gave you a link, but here are some more.

{
This period was defined by a major economic crisis faced by the Nazi government in 1936: demands of military production meant that quantities of raw materials that Germany had were falling dangerously low, and the German economy was heading for a trade deficit; between 1933 – 1936, German export prices dropped by 9%, while import prices increased by 9%, leading to a major financial crisis by 1936.

In response to this new crisis, the Nazi party envisioned a ‘Four Year Plan’, a series of economic reforms which would theoretically continue Germany’s path to becoming a superpower via the following means:

1. Reduction of employment – although this had been quite successful earlier on with Schacht’s New Plan (German unemployment was reduced to one million by 1937), it still had to be prioritised.

2. Increased synthetic fibre production – this included such materials as nylon and rubber. The dual purpose of this was to improve Germany’s technology to be on par with other great powers and to pursue the ideal of autarky, and also to ensure that Germany would not have to suffer from the effects of blockade of resources as had happened in World War One by the Royal Navy.

3. Continue public works projects – the mainstay of this aim was the Autobahn still in development at the time; the necessary number of workers were essentially drafted into service, as all unemployed men from the ages of 16 – 25 were made to work on the Autobahn. Side projects included various sports stadiums scattered around the country, flak towers (military fortifications) and statues and monuments dedicated to Hitler and the Nazi state.

4. Increase automobile production – Hitler loved cars, even though he could not drive himself. While the official reason was for the ‘betterment of the people’, the real driving force behind this was the hope that more men would learn how to drive and therefore enter the military with basic vehicular skills, thus cutting down training time when it came to driving trucks and the like.

5. Begin open re-armament. While military production had been de facto beginning ever since Hitler came to power in 1933, the Four Year Plan increased production drastically and made it ‘official’ government policy, in defiance of the Treaty of Versailles and the Allies.

As one can see from the five points, the Four Year Plan was very much one that was intended to put Germany on a war course; self sufficiency for war, building of military fortifications, military skills training and rearmament. This is in stark contrast to the New Plan, which emphasised stablity, peace and the betterment of the German people as a whole.

Hjalmar Schacht, who was not involved with the creation of the Four Year Plan, disliked the entire Plan as a whole but was vehemently opposed to Point 5, believing that it was in contradiction with attempts to stabilise the German economy and that antagonising the world powers would threaten Germany more than ever. Hitler, however, who was by then impatient with Schacht’s cautious trading measures and ‘consorting’ with ‘inferior’ states, dismissed Schacht’s concerns and placed Goering (with the benefit of hindsight, the ‘yes man’ of Hitler) in control of the Four Year Plan, who was far more supportive of Hitler’s rearmament policies. Schacht, who saw that he had essentially no more power in government, thus resigned his post as Reich Finance minister.}

Nazi economic policy, 1933 - 1945

So we see that even prior to the war, the Nazi economy was centrally planned and managed, including production goals set by Hitler himself.

{
Hitler, argues Kershaw, was deathly afraid of inflation and a repetition of the early 1920s. Nevertheless, he had to reduce unemployment or he wasn't going to last long enough to begin rearming Germany, a public goal of his since the '20s. Increasing exports was not a possibility since, unless the German government devalued the mark (as Britain had done with the pound and the United States with the dollar), German exports couldn't compete in a way that would add new jobs or bring needed foreign exchange. Hitler nixed devaluation because he thought it was a step on the road to inflation. Tax cuts were also out of the question because he believed they led to less revenue not more growth.

Hitler's solution for both the rearmament and unemployment problems was the same: massive deficit spending. In fact, by Kershaw's account, the Nazi government guaranteed some 35 billion ReichMarks to the German armed forces alone over an eight-year period, along with massive road building, subsidies to the auto industry, lots more bureaucrats to enforce all the new controls and regulations, and bribes to women to get married and stop working.}

Nazi Economics

If that sounds familiar, it's because it closely mirrors several of Stalin's 5 year plans.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Repeating that lie will not alter the fact that it is a lie. doper boi.

Nazism is a totalitarian system where the state controls the means of production, no different than what democrats promote for America.

The Nazi state did not control the means of production.

Please don't lie.

{
However, there is no doubt that work was created. The Nazis introduced public work schemes for men who worked in the National Labour Service (Reichsarbeitsdienst or RAD). Their work would have included digging ditches on farms to assist irrigation, building the new autobahns, planting new forests etc. The men of the RAD wore a military style uniform, lived in camps near to where they were working and received only what we would term pocket money. However, compared to the lack of success of the Weimar governmentand the chronic misery of 1931 to 1932, these men felt that at least the Nazi government was making the effort to improve their lot.

To ‘protect’ those in work, the German Labour Front was set up. This was lead by Robert Ley. The GLF took the role of trade unions which had been banned. To an extent, the GLF did this. Ley ordered that workers could not be sacked on the spot but he also ordered that a worker could not leave his job without the government’s permission. Only government labour exchanges could arrange for a new job if someone did leave his employment.

However, the GLF increased the number of hours worked from 60 to 72 per week (including overtime) by 1939. Strikes were outlawed. The average factory worker was earning 10 times more than those on dole money and few complained – though to do so was fraught with potential difficulties.}

The Nazis and the German Economy - History Learning Site

The state had 100% control of the economy after 1938.

Labor force is not a "means of production".

The Nazi government followed the form of socialism that Mussolini laid out. Government stooges ran state approved corporations which followed state designated production goals for state mandated products.

The Nazi regime had 100% control of the means of production.

I already gave you a link, but here are some more.

{
This period was defined by a major economic crisis faced by the Nazi government in 1936: demands of military production meant that quantities of raw materials that Germany had were falling dangerously low, and the German economy was heading for a trade deficit; between 1933 – 1936, German export prices dropped by 9%, while import prices increased by 9%, leading to a major financial crisis by 1936.

In response to this new crisis, the Nazi party envisioned a ‘Four Year Plan’, a series of economic reforms which would theoretically continue Germany’s path to becoming a superpower via the following means:

1. Reduction of employment – although this had been quite successful earlier on with Schacht’s New Plan (German unemployment was reduced to one million by 1937), it still had to be prioritised.

2. Increased synthetic fibre production – this included such materials as nylon and rubber. The dual purpose of this was to improve Germany’s technology to be on par with other great powers and to pursue the ideal of autarky, and also to ensure that Germany would not have to suffer from the effects of blockade of resources as had happened in World War One by the Royal Navy.

3. Continue public works projects – the mainstay of this aim was the Autobahn still in development at the time; the necessary number of workers were essentially drafted into service, as all unemployed men from the ages of 16 – 25 were made to work on the Autobahn. Side projects included various sports stadiums scattered around the country, flak towers (military fortifications) and statues and monuments dedicated to Hitler and the Nazi state.

4. Increase automobile production – Hitler loved cars, even though he could not drive himself. While the official reason was for the ‘betterment of the people’, the real driving force behind this was the hope that more men would learn how to drive and therefore enter the military with basic vehicular skills, thus cutting down training time when it came to driving trucks and the like.

5. Begin open re-armament. While military production had been de facto beginning ever since Hitler came to power in 1933, the Four Year Plan increased production drastically and made it ‘official’ government policy, in defiance of the Treaty of Versailles and the Allies.

As one can see from the five points, the Four Year Plan was very much one that was intended to put Germany on a war course; self sufficiency for war, building of military fortifications, military skills training and rearmament. This is in stark contrast to the New Plan, which emphasised stablity, peace and the betterment of the German people as a whole.

Hjalmar Schacht, who was not involved with the creation of the Four Year Plan, disliked the entire Plan as a whole but was vehemently opposed to Point 5, believing that it was in contradiction with attempts to stabilise the German economy and that antagonising the world powers would threaten Germany more than ever. Hitler, however, who was by then impatient with Schacht’s cautious trading measures and ‘consorting’ with ‘inferior’ states, dismissed Schacht’s concerns and placed Goering (with the benefit of hindsight, the ‘yes man’ of Hitler) in control of the Four Year Plan, who was far more supportive of Hitler’s rearmament policies. Schacht, who saw that he had essentially no more power in government, thus resigned his post as Reich Finance minister.}

Nazi economic policy, 1933 - 1945

So we see that even prior to the war, the Nazi economy was centrally planned and managed, including production goals set by Hitler himself.

{
Hitler, argues Kershaw, was deathly afraid of inflation and a repetition of the early 1920s. Nevertheless, he had to reduce unemployment or he wasn't going to last long enough to begin rearming Germany, a public goal of his since the '20s. Increasing exports was not a possibility since, unless the German government devalued the mark (as Britain had done with the pound and the United States with the dollar), German exports couldn't compete in a way that would add new jobs or bring needed foreign exchange. Hitler nixed devaluation because he thought it was a step on the road to inflation. Tax cuts were also out of the question because he believed they led to less revenue not more growth.

Hitler's solution for both the rearmament and unemployment problems was the same: massive deficit spending. In fact, by Kershaw's account, the Nazi government guaranteed some 35 billion ReichMarks to the German armed forces alone over an eight-year period, along with massive road building, subsidies to the auto industry, lots more bureaucrats to enforce all the new controls and regulations, and bribes to women to get married and stop working.}

Nazi Economics

If that sounds familiar, it's because it closely mirrors several of Stalin's 5 year plans.

 

[PredFan]

What did we do?

We created this country and our constitution. Abolition, women's rights, worker rights, civil rights, environmental protection, gay rights.....

What exactly have conservatives done for this country?

More guns and more prisons

Mostly lies.

Your party did not create this country nor the constitution, your party was against abolition and against equal treatment for blacks for decades, against civil rights for decades, for women's rights but ONLY democrat women, yes environmental protection and fay rights.

However, the destruction cited in the OP is all you assholes.

 

[rightwinger]

[
There is little question the Great Obama is the best President in 50 years

Well, that is about as true as most of what you post.

Of course the next time you tell the truth will be the first time, as we all know.

50 years ago was LBJ

Little question that the Great Obama has been the best POTUS in 50 years

 

[rightwinger]

[
There is little question the Great Obama is the best President in 50 years

Well, that is about as true as most of what you post.

Of course the next time you tell the truth will be the first time, as we all know.

50 years ago was LBJ

Little question that the Great Obama has been the best POTUS in 50 years

 

[rightwinger]

[
There is little question the Great Obama is the best President in 50 years

Well, that is about as true as most of what you post.

Of course the next time you tell the truth will be the first time, as we all know.

50 years ago was LBJ

Little question that the Great Obama has been the best POTUS in 50 years

 

[rightwinger]

What did we do?

We created this country and our constitution. Abolition, women's rights, worker rights, civil rights, environmental protection, gay rights.....

What exactly have conservatives done for this country?

More guns and more prisons

Mostly lies.

Your party did not create this country nor the constitution, your party was against abolition and against equal treatment for blacks for decades, against civil rights for decades, for women's rights but ONLY democrat women, yes environmental protection and fay rights.

However, the destruction cited in the OP is all you assholes.

Another moron who can't tell the difference between a political party and an ideology.

 

[rightwinger]

What did we do?

We created this country and our constitution. Abolition, women's rights, worker rights, civil rights, environmental protection, gay rights.....

What exactly have conservatives done for this country?

More guns and more prisons

Mostly lies.

Your party did not create this country nor the constitution, your party was against abolition and against equal treatment for blacks for decades, against civil rights for decades, for women's rights but ONLY democrat women, yes environmental protection and fay rights.

However, the destruction cited in the OP is all you assholes.

Another moron who can't tell the difference between a political party and an ideology.

 

[Thinker101]

What did we do?

We created this country and our constitution. Abolition, women's rights, worker rights, civil rights, environmental protection, gay rights.....

What exactly have conservatives done for this country?

More guns and more prisons

Apparently there are a few huge flaws in the Democrats version of women's rights.

 

[PredFan]

What did we do?

We created this country and our constitution. Abolition, women's rights, worker rights, civil rights, environmental protection, gay rights.....

What exactly have conservatives done for this country?

More guns and more prisons

Mostly lies.

Your party did not create this country nor the constitution, your party was against abolition and against equal treatment for blacks for decades, against civil rights for decades, for women's rights but ONLY democrat women, yes environmental protection and fay rights.

However, the destruction cited in the OP is all you assholes.

Another moron who can't tell the difference between a political party and an ideology.

The OP is about both. Dumbass.

 

[Thinker101]

I try to be, friendly and beneficial, whenever possible.

Hillary, is that you? Ya fricken cow.

 

[Thinker101]

I try to be, friendly and beneficial, whenever possible.

Hillary, is that you? Ya fricken cow.

 

[PredFan]

What did we do?

We created this country and our constitution. Abolition, women's rights, worker rights, civil rights, environmental protection, gay rights.....

What exactly have conservatives done for this country?

More guns and more prisons

Apparently there are a few huge flaws in the Democrats version of women's rights.

The Democrats are ONLY for the rights of women who toe the line. Just ask Sarah Palin.

 

[rightwinger]

What did we do?

We created this country and our constitution. Abolition, women's rights, worker rights, civil rights, environmental protection, gay rights.....

What exactly have conservatives done for this country?

More guns and more prisons

Mostly lies.

Your party did not create this country nor the constitution, your party was against abolition and against equal treatment for blacks for decades, against civil rights for decades, for women's rights but ONLY democrat women, yes environmental protection and fay rights.

However, the destruction cited in the OP is all you assholes.

Another moron who can't tell the difference between a political party and an ideology.

The OP is about both. Dumbass.

The OP is about LIBERALS

You can actually have liberal Republicans

 

[rightwinger]

What did we do?

We created this country and our constitution. Abolition, women's rights, worker rights, civil rights, environmental protection, gay rights.....

What exactly have conservatives done for this country?

More guns and more prisons

Mostly lies.

Your party did not create this country nor the constitution, your party was against abolition and against equal treatment for blacks for decades, against civil rights for decades, for women's rights but ONLY democrat women, yes environmental protection and fay rights.

However, the destruction cited in the OP is all you assholes.

Another moron who can't tell the difference between a political party and an ideology.

The OP is about both. Dumbass.

The OP is about LIBERALS

You can actually have liberal Republicans

 

[PoliticalChic]

Strange that you'd say that......

Hitler was a Leftist, a National Socialist.....just as Stalin, and every Fascist, Communist, Socialist, Liberals and Progressive.

Why would the Right want a Leftist in charge?

Because, national socialism is to the right of liberal socialism, dear.

Repeating that lie will not alter the fact that it is a lie. doper boi.

Nazism is a totalitarian system where the state controls the means of production, no different than what democrats promote for America.

The Nazi state did not control the means of production.

"The Nazi state did not control the means of production."


Just when I imagine you've posted an absurdity....you lower the bar even more.

"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.


2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.


4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.

5. De facto government ownership of the means of production... was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State." Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian



Get thee to a library!!!!!

The article you produced lacks the necessary citations to support its assertions. It's entirely useless.

The framework for the productive forces in Nazi Germany was capitalist. Private property, wage labor and private profit. Government intervention in the markets did not alter that arrangement.

Learning isn't your forte, is it.


Just remember this, and you'll be fine: I am never wrong.
Everything I post is 100% correct, accurate and true.


You're dismissed.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You.....Democrats, Liberals, Progressives.....and the throngs of misguided acolytes who never think through what you have agreed to empower.




1. In allowing yourselves to have been tricked into giving power the sinister party in the hope of bettering society, you've done the very opposite: you've poisoned the culture, set one man's hand against the next.
You have reduced the culture to a gutter level, agreed to children born out of wedlock, snuffing out the lives of the unborn, fed a welfare culture that embraces drug and alcohol abuse, crime, violence, recreational sex, illegitimacy, and family breakup.

And poverty remains at close to exactly what it was when the Democrat 'war on poverty' began....$22 trillion ago.



2. The central truth is that Leftist doctrine eschews religion and morality, and makes no differentiation between humans and every other form of life.
There is no morality. No care or concern for other, or for life. Nor is any required. This is the gift of the Enlightenment, with its view to replacing religion with science, with reason. Here it is today, explained not by Jack London, but by former Obama czar Steven Rattner:
“Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”
Opinion | Health Care Reform Beyond Obamacare

To put it more directly:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky




3. Here, the beating heart of the Democrat Party: "In this particular idea of the Enlightenment, the need to change human nature, and to eliminate customs and traditions, to remake established institutions, to do away with all inequalities in order to bring man closer to the state, which was the expression of the general will." Talmon, “Origins of Totalitarian Democracy,” p. 3-7

4. You elected....twice....a rapist and convicted perjurer and low-life who forced this upon the nation:
"Sexual definitions, the researchers hypothesized, were inevitably shaped by President Clinton’s famous “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” statement and the ensuing national discussion.

“Like President Clinton, adolescents and young adults often interpret these words with a degree of latitude, depending on whether they want to maintain an image of being sexually experienced or inexperienced,” the report explained.

“Unlike respondents in the previous samples, our respondents were adolescents after the Clinton-Lewinsky era, which our comparisons of data over time suggest may have been a turning point in conceptualizations of oral-genital contact. The dramatic and sudden shift in attitudes toward oral-genital contact can therefore be termed the Clinton-Lewinsky effect.”
'Clinton-Lewinsky Effect': Study Shows Students' Changing Views Of Oral Sex | HuffPost



Democrats, Liberals, Progressives......what have you done?

Name one piece of Republican legislation since 2001 that has been proven to help the middle class and the poor, without also helping the extremely wealthy.

How about since 1991? 1981?

Earlier, some imbecile said this:
"All You Have To Know About Obama
Best president in over 50 years"

Any idea who that imbecile was????

Oh, wait......
You did say that, didn't you?


That's all any reader has to know about your insight, and your mental condition.

I've bested you once again. You are incapable of debating me.

"I've bested you once again. You are incapable of debating me."

I just glanced at 'positive ratings' for each of us....

....they appear to say something quite different.....

 

[PoliticalChic]

What did we do?

We created this country and our constitution. Abolition, women's rights, worker rights, civil rights, environmental protection, gay rights.....

What exactly have conservatives done for this country?

More guns and more prisons

Apparently there are a few huge flaws in the Democrats version of women's rights.

 

[Synthaholic]

No, what makes you a dumbass is attacking people while ignorantly using fake words like 'grok'...

You're a really stupid ************.

the definition of grok

Definition of GROK

grok | Definition of grok in English by Oxford Dictionaries

 

[PredFan]

What did we do?

We created this country and our constitution. Abolition, women's rights, worker rights, civil rights, environmental protection, gay rights.....

What exactly have conservatives done for this country?

More guns and more prisons

Mostly lies.

Your party did not create this country nor the constitution, your party was against abolition and against equal treatment for blacks for decades, against civil rights for decades, for women's rights but ONLY democrat women, yes environmental protection and fay rights.

However, the destruction cited in the OP is all you assholes.

Another moron who can't tell the difference between a political party and an ideology.

The OP is about both. Dumbass.

The OP is about LIBERALS

You can actually have liberal Republicans

Learn to read ffs.

 

[Synthaholic]

You.....Democrats, Liberals, Progressives.....and the throngs of misguided acolytes who never think through what you have agreed to empower.




1. In allowing yourselves to have been tricked into giving power the sinister party in the hope of bettering society, you've done the very opposite: you've poisoned the culture, set one man's hand against the next.
You have reduced the culture to a gutter level, agreed to children born out of wedlock, snuffing out the lives of the unborn, fed a welfare culture that embraces drug and alcohol abuse, crime, violence, recreational sex, illegitimacy, and family breakup.

And poverty remains at close to exactly what it was when the Democrat 'war on poverty' began....$22 trillion ago.



2. The central truth is that Leftist doctrine eschews religion and morality, and makes no differentiation between humans and every other form of life.
There is no morality. No care or concern for other, or for life. Nor is any required. This is the gift of the Enlightenment, with its view to replacing religion with science, with reason. Here it is today, explained not by Jack London, but by former Obama czar Steven Rattner:
“Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”
Opinion | Health Care Reform Beyond Obamacare

To put it more directly:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky




3. Here, the beating heart of the Democrat Party: "In this particular idea of the Enlightenment, the need to change human nature, and to eliminate customs and traditions, to remake established institutions, to do away with all inequalities in order to bring man closer to the state, which was the expression of the general will." Talmon, “Origins of Totalitarian Democracy,” p. 3-7

4. You elected....twice....a rapist and convicted perjurer and low-life who forced this upon the nation:
"Sexual definitions, the researchers hypothesized, were inevitably shaped by President Clinton’s famous “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” statement and the ensuing national discussion.

“Like President Clinton, adolescents and young adults often interpret these words with a degree of latitude, depending on whether they want to maintain an image of being sexually experienced or inexperienced,” the report explained.

“Unlike respondents in the previous samples, our respondents were adolescents after the Clinton-Lewinsky era, which our comparisons of data over time suggest may have been a turning point in conceptualizations of oral-genital contact. The dramatic and sudden shift in attitudes toward oral-genital contact can therefore be termed the Clinton-Lewinsky effect.”
'Clinton-Lewinsky Effect': Study Shows Students' Changing Views Of Oral Sex | HuffPost



Democrats, Liberals, Progressives......what have you done?

Name one piece of Republican legislation since 2001 that has been proven to help the middle class and the poor, without also helping the extremely wealthy.

How about since 1991? 1981?

Earlier, some imbecile said this:
"All You Have To Know About Obama
Best president in over 50 years"

Any idea who that imbecile was????

Oh, wait......
You did say that, didn't you?


That's all any reader has to know about your insight, and your mental condition.

I've bested you once again. You are incapable of debating me.

"I've bested you once again. You are incapable of debating me."

I just glanced at 'positive ratings' for each of us....

....they appear to say something quite different.....

Validation from your fellow uninformed wingnuts?

No thanks. I'll just stick to proving you wrong, while you stick to deflecting from my facts.

 

[rightwinger]

You.....Democrats, Liberals, Progressives.....and the throngs of misguided acolytes who never think through what you have agreed to empower.




1. In allowing yourselves to have been tricked into giving power the sinister party in the hope of bettering society, you've done the very opposite: you've poisoned the culture, set one man's hand against the next.
You have reduced the culture to a gutter level, agreed to children born out of wedlock, snuffing out the lives of the unborn, fed a welfare culture that embraces drug and alcohol abuse, crime, violence, recreational sex, illegitimacy, and family breakup.

And poverty remains at close to exactly what it was when the Democrat 'war on poverty' began....$22 trillion ago.



2. The central truth is that Leftist doctrine eschews religion and morality, and makes no differentiation between humans and every other form of life.
There is no morality. No care or concern for other, or for life. Nor is any required. This is the gift of the Enlightenment, with its view to replacing religion with science, with reason. Here it is today, explained not by Jack London, but by former Obama czar Steven Rattner:
“Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”
Opinion | Health Care Reform Beyond Obamacare

To put it more directly:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky




3. Here, the beating heart of the Democrat Party: "In this particular idea of the Enlightenment, the need to change human nature, and to eliminate customs and traditions, to remake established institutions, to do away with all inequalities in order to bring man closer to the state, which was the expression of the general will." Talmon, “Origins of Totalitarian Democracy,” p. 3-7

4. You elected....twice....a rapist and convicted perjurer and low-life who forced this upon the nation:
"Sexual definitions, the researchers hypothesized, were inevitably shaped by President Clinton’s famous “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” statement and the ensuing national discussion.

“Like President Clinton, adolescents and young adults often interpret these words with a degree of latitude, depending on whether they want to maintain an image of being sexually experienced or inexperienced,” the report explained.

“Unlike respondents in the previous samples, our respondents were adolescents after the Clinton-Lewinsky era, which our comparisons of data over time suggest may have been a turning point in conceptualizations of oral-genital contact. The dramatic and sudden shift in attitudes toward oral-genital contact can therefore be termed the Clinton-Lewinsky effect.”
'Clinton-Lewinsky Effect': Study Shows Students' Changing Views Of Oral Sex | HuffPost



Democrats, Liberals, Progressives......what have you done?

Name one piece of Republican legislation since 2001 that has been proven to help the middle class and the poor, without also helping the extremely wealthy.

How about since 1991? 1981?

Earlier, some imbecile said this:
"All You Have To Know About Obama
Best president in over 50 years"

Any idea who that imbecile was????

Oh, wait......
You did say that, didn't you?


That's all any reader has to know about your insight, and your mental condition.

I've bested you once again. You are incapable of debating me.

"I've bested you once again. You are incapable of debating me."

I just glanced at 'positive ratings' for each of us....

....they appear to say something quite different.....

Self declared victories by Princess Cut'n Paste?

Is there anything more pathetic??

 

[PoliticalChic]

No, what makes you a dumbass is attacking people while ignorantly using fake words like 'grok'...

You're a really stupid ************.

the definition of grok

Definition of GROK

grok | Definition of grok in English by Oxford Dictionaries

It seems you've picked up the greater part of your vocabulary from men's rooms walls. How droll.


There is a simple explanation, so simple that even one such as you, with your limited ....ability....may understand your propensity:

Time and again, when folks realize they have been skewered, that they have no adequate response to truth that destroys their worldview, their most closely held beliefs, their language falls to the vulgar.

It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at being bested leaks out as vulgarity.

That would be you.