I'm sure it's all magical nonsense to you like a cellphone would be to a neolithic cave man.
With the key difference being, I can hand a caveman a cell phone and show it exists and works. And any two people would be forced to agree on both.. meanwhile, no two of you faithy types can agree on a single bit of this magical nonsense. That's what results, when you have no good method of discerning truth from nonsense.
Invalid argument as always because you're comparing apples and oranges. Spiritually is totally inward and personal, the extreme opposite of a piece of plastic and silicon. If you're trying to say religion is invalidated because you can't hold it in your hand, measure it with a ruler, that is about the stupidest, most obtuse argument I've ever heard. You're basically saying that anything not concrete you cannot determine with your overt 5 senses then must not exist. Might as well argued the existence of other galaxies with a man from the 18th century, or even radio waves. There not being an outward, overt way of seeing these things made them no less valid. Likewise, you are once again an arrogant total fail because you dare say like the blind man who has never seen a cloud that because YOU cannot determine something's reality, you deny it's existence to all others even if they see its reality themselves.
Actually, you CAN'T hand a caveman a cellphone and show him that it works. It doesn't exist in his world. He has no common basis of reference in order to understand it. He may see it, but would, like you with religion, misinterpret it as evil, have no idea what it actually is, far beyond his ken, smash it out of fear, then probably kill you as an evil spirit. Hell, he might do that just for your having white skin. Where you get the idea that no two "faithy" types can agree, I don't know---- probably from talking to people on social media who say much more than they typically know and the fact that in common society today, few people are as serious or deep about their faith as they once were. Probably from being persecuted for it by buttholes like you, that it just BUGS you so much because YOU DON'T GET IT.
So you try to dismiss all religion and spiritual belief as just primitive, backward superstition. Pretty easy to ignore then, eh? When it comes to the specific details of real religion between religious scholars and true adherents (vedic scientists, monks, etc.), there is little disagreement as to the purport of this canto or that. The mechanisms are well understood. Likewise with the Koran. Some of this stuff was passed down for generations by word of mouth with little variation. Ask any ayatollahs or imams and I don't think you'll find too much argument as to what Mohammad meant by this or that. Where you get the disagreement is when you delve out into the loose, radical factions who wish to reinvent things to serve their own political ends. When it comes to the Bible, there may be some slight interpretive differences of the books, but the conclusions as to their meaning and significance don't vary much between Bishops and the like. You know nothing about religion, you've never had a religious experience, never mentored under a guru or priest, imam or the like and you think you can understand it and debate and refute it because you read some articles on the web.
