What Gives You People The Right To Ban People From Social Media Simply Over Differing Opinions?

[mudwhistle]

Democrats are busying roaming around social-media trying to get anyone who they have a differing opinion with removed from the platform.
That's really what it amounts to.
They think that because they have the power to do it....nobody can stop them.

They dress up their censorship with a statement that the guilty party was spreading misinformation which goes against their made up rules.
Breaking the rules results in a ban.....but all the guilty party did was express a different opinion, and anyone who knows the left, having a different opinion is unforgivable.
So after years of warning....we can see the establishment using word-police to stifle freedom of speech.
Is this China.....or is it America?



Nobody is going to be allowed to have millions of followers, voice different opinions, and not end up being attacked by the left.
In a nutshell: The left is using the COVID pandemic to act as word-police against their opposition.
Whether the pandemic is real doesn't matter. What the left is doing with it is what is wrong and should be thoroughly condemned.
But not only is the Biden Adm encouraging this to continue....but they're working with social-media to make is worse.

Links

The problem with social media censorship | The Bradford

whsbradford.org

The Truth About Social Media Censorship - The List

Social media censorship is a tricky subject. While people have a right to free expression, there are still limits to what one can say on a public platform.

www.thelist.com

Social Media Censorship and the Law- FindLaw

FindLaw's article on Social Media Censorship and the Law. For more information on this and related topics, see FindLaw's section on Enforcing Your Civil Rights.

www.findlaw.com

 

[Otis Mayfield]

Joe Rogan isn't banned.

trump was banned from twitter for calling for violence.

 

[Ringel05]

 

[bodecea]

View attachment 596119

Democrats are busying roaming around social-media trying to get anyone who they have a differing opinion with removed from the platform.
That's really what it amounts to.
They think that because they have the power to do it....nobody can stop them.

They dress up their censorship with a statement that the guilty party was spreading misinformation which goes against their made up rules.
Breaking the rules results in a ban.....but all the guilty party did was express a different opinion, and anyone who knows the left, having a different opinion is unforgivable.
So after years of warning....we can see the establishment using word-police to stifle freedom of speech.
Is this China.....or is it America?



Nobody is going to be allowed to have millions of followers, voice different opinions, and not end up being attacked by the left.
In a nutshell: The left is using the COVID pandemic to act as word-police against their opposition.
Whether the pandemic is real doesn't matter. What the left is doing with it is what is wrong and should be thoroughly condemned.
But not only is the Biden Adm encouraging this to continue....but they're working with social-media to make is worse.

Links

The problem with social media censorship | The Bradford

whsbradford.org

The Truth About Social Media Censorship - The List

Social media censorship is a tricky subject. While people have a right to free expression, there are still limits to what one can say on a public platform.

www.thelist.com

Social Media Censorship and the Law- FindLaw

FindLaw's article on Social Media Censorship and the Law. For more information on this and related topics, see FindLaw's section on Enforcing Your Civil Rights.

www.findlaw.com

"you people"................

 

[The Original Tree]

View attachment 596119

Democrats are busying roaming around social-media trying to get anyone who they have a differing opinion with removed from the platform.
That's really what it amounts to.
They think that because they have the power to do it....nobody can stop them.

They dress up their censorship with a statement that the guilty party was spreading misinformation which goes against their made up rules.
Breaking the rules results in a ban.....but all the guilty party did was express a different opinion, and anyone who knows the left, having a different opinion is unforgivable.
So after years of warning....we can see the establishment using word-police to stifle freedom of speech.
Is this China.....or is it America?



Nobody is going to be allowed to have millions of followers, voice different opinions, and not end up being attacked by the left.
In a nutshell: The left is using the COVID pandemic to act as word-police against their opposition.
Whether the pandemic is real doesn't matter. What the left is doing with it is what is wrong and should be thoroughly condemned.
But not only is the Biden Adm encouraging this to continue....but they're working with social-media to make is worse.

Links

The problem with social media censorship | The Bradford

whsbradford.org

The Truth About Social Media Censorship - The List

Social media censorship is a tricky subject. While people have a right to free expression, there are still limits to what one can say on a public platform.

www.thelist.com

Social Media Censorship and the Law- FindLaw

FindLaw's article on Social Media Censorship and the Law. For more information on this and related topics, see FindLaw's section on Enforcing Your Civil Rights.

www.findlaw.com

Satan has told them to do this.

 

[The Original Tree]

Joe Rogan isn't banned.

trump was banned from twitter for calling for violence.

Lies from a child of Hell, whose Father is the Father of Lies!

Repent Evil Doer!

 

[Chillicothe]

"What Gives You People The Right......"​

Ummm? "You people"?

Well, you can be you, good poster mudwhistle; however.......

However, this is an internet gossipboard 'peopled' by avatars posting anonymously under fake names. There doesn't seem to be much there there ....for you to fantasize that contributors to USMessagBoards have a whole lot of leverage.....a whole lot of decision-power......in who gets banned from Twitter, YouTube, Spotify, etc.

Now, to be sure, I could well be underestimating the political horsepower of the posters here. I'll admit that.

But......I don't think so.

 

[Slade3200]

View attachment 596119

Democrats are busying roaming around social-media trying to get anyone who they have a differing opinion with removed from the platform.
That's really what it amounts to.
They think that because they have the power to do it....nobody can stop them.

They dress up their censorship with a statement that the guilty party was spreading misinformation which goes against their made up rules.
Breaking the rules results in a ban.....but all the guilty party did was express a different opinion, and anyone who knows the left, having a different opinion is unforgivable.
So after years of warning....we can see the establishment using word-police to stifle freedom of speech.
Is this China.....or is it America?



Nobody is going to be allowed to have millions of followers, voice different opinions, and not end up being attacked by the left.
In a nutshell: The left is using the COVID pandemic to act as word-police against their opposition.
Whether the pandemic is real doesn't matter. What the left is doing with it is what is wrong and should be thoroughly condemned.
But not only is the Biden Adm encouraging this to continue....but they're working with social-media to make is worse.

Links

The problem with social media censorship | The Bradford

whsbradford.org

The Truth About Social Media Censorship - The List

Social media censorship is a tricky subject. While people have a right to free expression, there are still limits to what one can say on a public platform.

www.thelist.com

Social Media Censorship and the Law- FindLaw

FindLaw's article on Social Media Censorship and the Law. For more information on this and related topics, see FindLaw's section on Enforcing Your Civil Rights.

www.findlaw.com

It cracks me up when I see people like the three tools on the Fox morning show literally sit there and listen to comments from Psaki and then completely mischaracterize them in response. I’d say they aren’t fooling anybody by doing that crap but they obviously are. Crazy

 

[mudwhistle]

Joe Rogan isn't banned.

trump was banned from twitter for calling for violence.

Trump called for peace and was banned because they wanted to have an excuse to ban him for years.
They used Jan 6th as an excuse.

 

[Slade3200]

View attachment 596119

Democrats are busying roaming around social-media trying to get anyone who they have a differing opinion with removed from the platform.
That's really what it amounts to.
They think that because they have the power to do it....nobody can stop them.

They dress up their censorship with a statement that the guilty party was spreading misinformation which goes against their made up rules.
Breaking the rules results in a ban.....but all the guilty party did was express a different opinion, and anyone who knows the left, having a different opinion is unforgivable.
So after years of warning....we can see the establishment using word-police to stifle freedom of speech.
Is this China.....or is it America?



Nobody is going to be allowed to have millions of followers, voice different opinions, and not end up being attacked by the left.
In a nutshell: The left is using the COVID pandemic to act as word-police against their opposition.
Whether the pandemic is real doesn't matter. What the left is doing with it is what is wrong and should be thoroughly condemned.
But not only is the Biden Adm encouraging this to continue....but they're working with social-media to make is worse.

Links

The problem with social media censorship | The Bradford

whsbradford.org

The Truth About Social Media Censorship - The List

Social media censorship is a tricky subject. While people have a right to free expression, there are still limits to what one can say on a public platform.

www.thelist.com

Social Media Censorship and the Law- FindLaw

FindLaw's article on Social Media Censorship and the Law. For more information on this and related topics, see FindLaw's section on Enforcing Your Civil Rights.

www.findlaw.com

People get banned for breaking rules not for having different opinions.

 

[Chillicothe]

CALL:

"trump was banned from twitter for calling for violence.

RESPONSE:

Original Tree: "Lies from a child of Hell, whose Father is the Father of Lies! Repent Evil Doer!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I love this bar.

 

[protectionist]

Joe Rogan isn't banned.

trump was banned from twitter for calling for violence.

What did Trump say that called for violence ?

 

[protectionist]

It cracks me up when I see people like the three tools on the Fox morning show literally sit there and listen to comments from Psaki and then completely mischaracterize them in response. I’d say they aren’t fooling anybody by doing that crap but they obviously are. Crazy

Mischaracterize, like WHAT ? Got any examples ?

 

[protectionist]

Wasn't Whoopi banned for talking racist against Jews ?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Joe Rogan isn't banned.

trump was banned from twitter for calling for violence.

Lying fuck

 

[AMart]

Joe Rogan isn't banned.

trump was banned from twitter for calling for violence.

link?

Wasn't Whoopi banned for talking racist against Jews

She got a 2 week time out. If she was white she would have gotten fired.

 

[kaz]

Joe Rogan isn't banned.

trump was banned from twitter for calling for violence.

And yet Trump didn't call for violence, you are lying.

So dickless wonder, show the quote Trump called for violence. If he had done that, it would be all over the internet.

Oh yea, I just callenged you to prove something you can't.

So next best thing, man up and admit you lied about Trump.

We both now you aren't a man, so never mind

 

[Slade3200]

Mischaracterize, like WHAT ? Got any examples ?

Did you listen to it?! Everything Killmead said after the Psaki clip was an outright distortion and not relative to her comments. If you can’t hear that then I don’t know what to tell you

 

[kaz]

Trump called for peace and was banned because they wanted to have an excuse to ban him for years.
They used Jan 6th as an excuse

Yep

 

[Slade3200]

And yet Trump didn't call for violence, you are lying.

So dickless wonder, show the quote Trump called for violence. If he had done that, it would be all over the internet.

Oh yea, I just callenged you to prove something you can't.

So next best thing, man up and admit you lied about Trump.

We both now you aren't a man, so never mind

Overview

On January 8, 2021, President Donald J. Trump Tweeted:

“The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!”

Shortly thereafter, the President Tweeted:

“To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.”

Due to the ongoing tensions in the United States, and an uptick in the global conversation in regards to the people who violently stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021, these two Tweets must be read in the context of broader events in the country and the ways in which the President’s statements can be mobilized by different audiences, including to incite violence, as well as in the context of the pattern of behavior from this account in recent weeks. After assessing the language in these Tweets against our Glorification of Violence policy, we have determined that these Tweets are in violation of the Glorification of Violence Policy and the user @realDonaldTrump should be immediately permanently suspended from the service.

Assessment

We assessed the two Tweets referenced above under our Glorification of Violence policy, which aims to prevent the glorification of violence that could inspire others to replicate violent acts and determined that they were highly likely to encourage and inspire people to replicate the criminal acts that took place at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

This determination is based on a number of factors, including:

• President Trump’s statement that he will not be attending the Inauguration is being received by a number of his supporters as further confirmation that the election was not legitimate and is seen as him disavowing his previous claim made via two Tweets (1, 2) by his Deputy Chief of Staff, Dan Scavino, that there would be an “orderly transition” on January 20th.
• The second Tweet may also serve as encouragement to those potentially considering violent acts that the Inauguration would be a “safe” target, as he will not be attending.
• The use of the words “American Patriots” to describe some of his supporters is also being interpreted as support for those committing violent acts at the US Capitol.
• The mention of his supporters having a “GIANT VOICE long into the future” and that “They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!” is being interpreted as further indication that President Trump does not plan to facilitate an “orderly transition” and instead that he plans to continue to support, empower, and shield those who believe he won the election.
• Plans for future armed protests have already begun proliferating on and off-Twitter, including a proposed secondary attack on the US Capitol and state capitol buildings on January 17, 2021.

As such, our determination is that the two Tweets above are likely to inspire others to replicate the violent acts that took place on January 6, 2021, and that there are multiple indicators that they are being received and understood as encouragement to do so.