Zone1 What gender.correct pronoun do you use for Jesus?

[Zebra]

I am not as stated but do have a link to a right wing group that indicate, that if one reads the Bible literally, and Jesus is born of a virgin and without male gens, like all ambiogenetic birth, Jesus would have had to be female all of his life.

sorry, i have no such link

 

[BackAgain]

i hope you know what a pronoun is.

you can choose here between he or she or they

He is known as the Son of God.

Therein lies the answer.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

I am not as stated but do have a link to a right wing group that indicate, that if one reads the Bible literally, and Jesus is born of a virgin and without male gens, like all ambiogenetic birth, Jesus would have had to be female all of his life.

Despite the Christians claim that Jesus without a male's contribution, there remains no example of parthenogenesis that has ever occurred in human females. The claim about Jesus is just one from similar claims long time prior about an Egyptian Pharaoh.
The Hebrews considered sexual reproduction necessary, but otherwise an unclean thing to be involved in, so in following their line of thinking, they had to have God's son be born without the messy involvement of human sperm.
As to any claims he was some combination of God and human, to me he was simply the world's first hippie.

 

[BreezeWood]

Are you kidding? This isn't going to be a satire thread in Zone 1 religion, is it?

what would be wrong w/ satire in zone-1 are you being flippant, threatening as having anything to do w/ a desert religion being of a special concern for its latitude than free expression over servitude and denial.

they thought differently in the 1st century till of course its unwarranted conclusion. by the crucifiers - as an example. 666

 

[BreezeWood]

Sides He and She capitalized or not are the only two possibilities. It happens at conception.

with a god ...

physiology and spiritual content are not one in the same can vary in degrees - evolution not reactionaries is the true guide for the future.

 

[White 6]

Zebra (the Thread OP) contacted me, and this is a topic of conversation, in his country, and his intent, was that it be under Zone 1 Religion rules. You have seen no Mod Red, comments from me. After our conversation, I have not even felt a need to check it.

 

[Cougarbear]

with a god ...

physiology and spiritual content are not one in the same can vary in degrees - evolution not reactionaries is the true guide for the future.

Scientifically, everyone's gender and sex happens at conception with the flash of zinc light. Everyone's DNA comes into life immediately including the chromosomes that give the sex and gender of each individual. The science of this is settled.

 

[Moonglow]

i hope you know what a pronoun is.

you can choose here between he or she or they

Where is thee?

 

[Moonglow]

Scientifically, everyone's gender and sex happens at conception with the flash of zinc light. Everyone's DNA comes into life immediately including the chromosomes that give the sex and gender of each individual. The science of this is settled.

Not really, I am guessing you never did get around to biology class?

 

[Cougarbear]

Not really, I am guessing you never did get around to biology class?

Instead of stupid comments, why don't you write what you think happens at conception when it comes to DNA including your X and Y chromosomes. It happens at conception. It happens when the Gametes come together in the fertilization process and combine to form a single complete genome. This fusion to form the Zygote creates a single cell with all the DNA components to divide and replicate. Some want to nitpick and say it's not a creation of a new person but an inheritance of family traits. Whatever. It's a new separate individual with it's own set of DNA including the X and Y chromosomes that decide male or female.

On a similar note, the new personage being developed is a living Zygote and continues to grow throughout it's entire life. Well, we do start to break down after 30 or so years. That Zygote is not part of the mother but a completely new personage. It's life is supported by the mother. And, that's where the debate on abortion comes in. Because it is now a separate personage growing (alive) in the mother's womb, does it have the right to continue to live and grow through it's birth outside the mother? Abortionists say it's tissue part of the mother and therefore, she has the right to get rid of foreign tissue. Anti-abortionists say because the zygote has it's own DNA and is an individual personage at conception, it should have the right to live through birth and beyond. Because the Zygote-Embryo-Fetus cannot defend it's own right to live and grow, adults like Charlie Kirk are defending that child's rights as a separate living personage. And, it's the mother's responsibility to give it nourishment throughout the gestation period and beyond until the child can fend for itself. Which is in our laws, 18 years of age. Until then, the mother has the responsibility to raise the child. If she cannot, then put the child up for adoption, not kill it whether it's in one of the three prebirth trimesters or from age 0 to 18.

 

[Moonglow]

Instead of stupid comments, why don't you write what you think happens at conception when it comes to DNA including your X and Y chromosomes. It happens at conception. It happens when the Gametes come together in the fertilization process and combine to form a single complete genome. This fusion to form the Zygote creates a single cell with all the DNA components to divide and replicate. Some want to nitpick and say it's not a creation of a new person but an inheritance of family traits. Whatever. It's a new separate individual with it's own set of DNA including the X and Y chromosomes that decide male or female.

On a similar note, the new personage being developed is a living Zygote and continues to grow throughout it's entire life. Well, we do start to break down after 30 or so years. That Zygote is not part of the mother but a completely new personage. It's life is supported by the mother. And, that's where the debate on abortion comes in. Because it is now a separate personage growing (alive) in the mother's womb, does it have the right to continue to live and grow through it's birth outside the mother? Abortionists say it's tissue part of the mother and therefore, she has the right to get rid of foreign tissue. Anti-abortionists say because the zygote has it's own DNA and is an individual personage at conception, it should have the right to live through birth and beyond. Because the Zygote-Embryo-Fetus cannot defend it's own right to live and grow, adults like Charlie Kirk are defending that child's rights as a separate living personage. And, it's the mother's responsibility to give it nourishment throughout the gestation period and beyond until the child can fend for itself. Which is in our laws, 18 years of age. Until then, the mother has the responsibility to raise the child. If she cannot, then put the child up for adoption, not kill it whether it's in one of the three prebirth trimesters or from age 0 to 18.

And every one of them forms perfectly in yer world. Why do yous interject political propaganda?

 

[Cougarbear]

And every one of them forms perfectly in yer world. Why do yous interject political propaganda?

No. Everyone is subject to this world with their thorns and thistles, noxious weeds and the ills of the world. Adam and Eve were formed perfectly but became subject to the world's inflictions when banished and thrown into this world. But, that has nothing to do with the fact the X and Y chromosomes are assigned at the point of fertilization, the flash of light. From that point on, the zygote is a living organism separate of the mother's DNA. From that point on, there is no political propaganda. Just biological truth. The personage in the body of the mother is alive because it's growing. Can you dispute this? No. It's growing therefore, it's alive. The mother is not removing here own tissue with abortion. She is removing a person with it's own DNA and therefore killing an innocent personage.

 

[BreezeWood]

The science of this is settled.

with a god ...

the physiology achieves equilibriums not to mention the spiritual content that controls it - with evolution neither has bounds for wherever they may lead themselves.

 

[Cougarbear]

with a god ...

the physiology achieves equilibriums not to mention the spiritual content that controls it - with evolution neither has bounds for wherever they may lead themselves.

God did not do the science experiments. However, science once again proves God’s creation of man as male and female. Nothing else. A man can disfigure himself to look like a woman but will always fail to achieve his goal of becoming a woman. Vice versa as well.

 

[Zebra]

now 9 of 9 use He

 

[GreatestIam]

sorry, i have no such link

The 20 min. mark is interesting. Parthenogenetic.

 

[BreezeWood]

God did not do the science experiments. However, science once again proves God’s creation of man as male and female. Nothing else. A man can disfigure himself to look like a woman but will always fail to achieve his goal of becoming a woman. Vice versa as well.

you are brain dead, a common malady of desert dwellers ...

why are there sex's might be a consideration for the delineation is fluid - what exactly is the problem you are experiencing.

 

[Cougarbear]

you are brain dead, a common malady of desert dwellers ...

why are there sex's might be a consideration for the delineation is fluid - what exactly is the problem you are experiencing.

Try English when you type. Your statement is incoherent. Sounded like an 8 year old typed it. There are two sexes. Look at it this way, there are apples and oranges, and if an apple is slightly yellowish, it has some orange-ish qualities, which makes it an orapple. What you nutcases are doing is peak cope for your feelings. you can continue to subdivide the number of "sexes" into 7.7 billion distinct subsets, which is absolutely meaningless. We are either male of female with some things in common. If you have a "Y" chromosome you are male, period. If you drink lots of beer, you will grow breasts like women. But, you are just a beer drinking drunk of a male man.

 

[The Irish Ram]

As Yeshua (correct spelling) never existed I would nothing. He was and is not real. He is a fiction. Not real. A ******* LIE!

Who is it that the historians refer to?? How about the grave of James, brother of Jesus?
To name a few historians who wrote about Jesus:
Tacitus
Suetonis
Flavius Josephus
Pliny
Lucian
Nicodemus
Sarapion
^ All considered reputable with absolutely no reason to believe that, not knowing one another, they all wrote lies in unison about Christ.

The Han Dynasty in China recorded the darkness that fell on the earth while Christ was being punished for our sins:
From the latter Han Dynasty:
Ying and Yang have mistakenly switched, the sun and the moon eclipsed. The sins of all the people are now on one man. Pardon is proclaimed to all under heaven. The man from Heaven has died.

You are about the only one who doesn't realize that Christ walked on this earth.

 

[teddyearp]

i hope you know what a pronoun is.

you can choose here between he or she or they

Since you asked for Jesus proboun, of course it is He. But I'll toss a factoid out or at the least a personal premise.

The pronoun for God may be they. Thought the whole creation portion, the word "God" is translated from the Hebrew Elohim. In Hebrew the -im suffix is plural. So basically in Genesis, we are sort of introduced to the Trinity. Just like in John 1.

How are they one and they at the same time? That's the fun of always seeking to find. I still refer to God/Yahweh as He also though.