What exactly did they do?

[rightwinger]

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

There is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server. That's what the DNC tells us, but we have no reason to believe it.

Read the latest indictments from the Justice
Dept, QTARD.

we have read them, 12 Russian citizens indicted for allegedly hacking into the DNC servers. US law does not apply to Russian citizens operating in Russia. the indictments are a waste of time and money. And, since the FBI and DOJ never looked at the DNC servers, can you tell us how they know they were hacked and by who?

The FBI imaged the servers and investigated what was on them

The rest is just nuts and bolts

Why do you keep posting this lie? Post a credible link that supports your claim, or shut the **** up. The FBI never touched the servers.

The FBI recovered everything that was on those servers

Just ask them

 

[bripat9643]

Trumpanzees proving they are as ill informed as their cult leader.

What Mueller Knows About the DNC Hack—And Trump Doesn’t

In Helsinki on Monday, President Donald Trump stood feet away from Russian President Vladimir Putin and fielded a simple question from an AP reporter: Whose account of the 2016 election does he believe—that of Putin, who claims Russia did not interfere in the U.S. presidential election, or every major U.S. intelligence agency, which have unanimously concluded that it did?

In response, the president brought up a well-rehearsed conspiracy theory implying that after being hacked, the Democratic National Committee refused to help the FBI investigation, and that therefore all evidence implicating Russia in election meddling was shaky. “You have groups that are wondering why the FBI never took the server,” Trump said. “Why didn’t they take the server? Where is the server, I want to know, and what is the server saying?”

Trump’s view is unmoored from reality in several ways.

Three days earlier, special counsel Robert Mueller published an indictment of 12 officers from the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, for interfering in the 2016 U.S. election, including by hacking into the DNC. The indictment is historically unprecedented in scope and detail. The FBI named-and-shamed two specific GRU units, their commanding officers and 10 subordinate officers while revealing stunning details of Russia’s hacking tradecraft. And a close read of it all shows why Trump’s “DNC didn’t give the server to the FBI” conspiracy theory makes no sense.

Post the text that supports your claim. Otherwise, shut the **** up.

 

[bripat9643]

There is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server. That's what the DNC tells us, but we have no reason to believe it.

Read the latest indictments from the Justice
Dept, QTARD.

we have read them, 12 Russian citizens indicted for allegedly hacking into the DNC servers. US law does not apply to Russian citizens operating in Russia. the indictments are a waste of time and money. And, since the FBI and DOJ never looked at the DNC servers, can you tell us how they know they were hacked and by who?

The FBI imaged the servers and investigated what was on them

The rest is just nuts and bolts

Why do you keep posting this lie? Post a credible link that supports your claim, or shut the **** up. The FBI never touched the servers.

The FBI recovered everything that was on those servers

Just ask them

Post a credible link, asshole. Otherwise, shut the **** up.

 

[Kondor3]

We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.

this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?

Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?

OK...let me try

Russians hacked into the DNC server much like the Watergate break-in broke into DNC headquarters. It was a crime then, it is a crime now

They released that information through Wikileaks and Trump used that information in his campaign.

Russians also engaged in a propaganda smear campaign against Hilary to help the candidate they preferred. That propaganda was readily distributed including on USMB

Fine...

Great...

Now... please prove that that dissemination had a material and substantive and statistically significant impact upon the outcome...

Doing so in a credible manner...

Until you can do that, that's all just Sour Grapes On Steroids... a puff of smoke, but hardly a wildfire, eh?

You people (Democrats) need to admit to yourselves that it was your Agenda and Candidate that defeated you; not the Roooskies...

Perhaps once you "grow up" and admit your own Primary Responsibility, you'll begin attracting others back into your tent again...

But neither I nor much of the rest of America are holding our breath that you even have that in you, never mind actually being able to do it.

 

[bripat9643]

like all gossip peddlers, he believed that he could make more than 20K using that information. Nothing unusual

I think it was pretty unusual. I haven't found that Wikileaks had anything to gain by offering that. I haven't seen that they've offered rewards for anything else.

come on, are you saying that wikileaks only published information damaging to Hillary? The Rich murder raises some valid questions, as does the Vince Foster suicide and the Ron Brown plane crash. We are entitled to know the truth. Are you afraid of the truth?

Some of the craziness that repeated enough times makes people believe it

Hear the one about Hillary and the pizza shop sex slaves?

That is what Hillary had to deal with..........Actual Fake News

I did not hear about any pizza sex slaves, but we all heard about Bill Clinton's visits to a underage sex slave island, and his BJs in the oval office by a young intern.

face reality for just once, winger. The Clintons are slime.

Ballsack says what?

Trump 'went to booze and cocaine-fuelled parties where men preyed on teen girls''

Models who say they attended boozy and cocaine-fuelled parties with Donald Trump have spoken out the first time about his alleged 'sexually inappropriate behaviour'.

You citing a British gossip rag. language like "He went to a boozy and cocaine fueled party" is horseshit that isn't admissible in court. No one at the party claims they had sex with Trump.

 

[bripat9643]

here is the latest ( but not the last ) round of indictments that go into detail about who, what, where, when, & how...

https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

you're welcome.

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

There is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server. That's what the DNC tells us, but we have no reason to believe it.

Read the latest indictments from the Justice
Dept, QTARD.

Indictments aren't evidence of anything, you stupid douchebag.

 

[Care4all]

It turned out that with Russian trolls pushing the facebook ads out ....

They reached 126 MILLION people!!!! yes, 126,000,000 people!!!!

So 126,000,000 dems were influenced to vote Trump by some meme's and some facebook content?
Holy ****!!!!
You people really are stupid!!!

I've said it a thousand times for every time you right wingers make that stupid statement and if you had actually read the last indictment you would know this as well....

the goal was not to make people vote FOR Trump, though that may have happened... the goal was to get Bernie supporters to hate Hillary, and either not come out to vote, or to vote against her.... but it was primarily to suppress the Democratic voters from coming out to vote.... and it worked.

Hilary did that all on her own.

nope, she actually did not... it was spurred and fueled by the Russian hacks and timed leaks and propaganda articles that tied in with the releases of the stolen merchandise.

Assange was screaming and yelling at the Russian hackers to get the stolen emails to him QUICKLY so Assange could release them with the negative propaganda news articles that they prepared to spin a story at the same time of the release.... SAYING that he, Assange, wanted to release them before the Democratic Convention, for the most impact in his and the Russian's goal of dividing Bernie supporters and Hillary supporters....

it worked.

Merchandise? Not sure you know what that word means.

Assange has stated repeatedly that the leaks did not come from the Russians. But thats really beside the point.

You're pissed that hillary got exposed for who she is. A crooked *****!!!

Here's a clue, it didn't expose anything... What you got from it, is propaganda articles that Assange along with a Journalist who he allowed to read the parts Assange highlighted of the emails ahead of time, and delivered a pure propaganda article spun in the negative....

Just show me ANY thing that you believed was shown from ANY of the emails,

and I will show you, how the spin on it, was not completely true or not true at all....

But you can't even SHOW what the emails exposed, yet you keep repeating the same propaganda that the emails showed how rotten Hillary was....

So what did these emails say, that you refer to?

And I am upset that their private emails of both the campaign and DNC were stolen, anyone should be! It's a BREAK IN just like Watergate, and the President, just like Nixon, is involved in a COVER-UP, TO HIS EYEBALLS.

But in this case, it is WORSE, because the Trump campaign got their help from the thieves, who were working with the Russian government Military Intelligence assigned by Putin to interfere and meddle in our democratic election process... they aided and abetted the enemy imo and many others too.

If Obama had done one tenth of what the Trump campaign and Trump has done, he would have been impeached by the Republicans already.

If Hillary was president and had done what the Trump campaign has done with working with Russia to bring Trump down, she would have been impeached already by this Republican congress.

If this were the times of respectable Republicans serving in congress as there were in Nixon's time, there would have been extensive, live on TV serious hearings before all of the citizens in this nation, and Trump would have been impeached by now.....

there is absolutely no way in the world you can deny that....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

So 126,000,000 dems were influenced to vote Trump by some meme's and some facebook content?
Holy ****!!!!
You people really are stupid!!!

I've said it a thousand times for every time you right wingers make that stupid statement and if you had actually read the last indictment you would know this as well....

the goal was not to make people vote FOR Trump, though that may have happened... the goal was to get Bernie supporters to hate Hillary, and either not come out to vote, or to vote against her.... but it was primarily to suppress the Democratic voters from coming out to vote.... and it worked.

Hilary did that all on her own.

nope, she actually did not... it was spurred and fueled by the Russian hacks and timed leaks and propaganda articles that tied in with the releases of the stolen merchandise.

Assange was screaming and yelling at the Russian hackers to get the stolen emails to him QUICKLY so Assange could release them with the negative propaganda news articles that they prepared to spin a story at the same time of the release.... SAYING that he, Assange, wanted to release them before the Democratic Convention, for the most impact in his and the Russian's goal of dividing Bernie supporters and Hillary supporters....

it worked.

Merchandise? Not sure you know what that word means.

Assange has stated repeatedly that the leaks did not come from the Russians. But thats really beside the point.

You're pissed that hillary got exposed for who she is. A crooked *****!!!

Here's a clue, it didn't expose anything... What you got from it, is propaganda articles that Assange along with a Journalist who he allowed to read the parts Assange highlighted of the emails ahead of time, and delivered a pure propaganda article spun in the negative....

Just show me ANY thing that you believed was shown from ANY of the emails,

and I will show you, how the spin on it, was not completely true or not true at all....

But you can't even SHOW what the emails exposed, yet you keep repeating the same propaganda that the emails showed how rotten Hillary was....

So what did these emails say, that you refer to?

And I am upset that their private emails of both the campaign and DNC were stolen, anyone should be! It's a BREAK IN just like Watergate, and the President, just like Nixon, is involved in a COVER-UP, TO HIS EYEBALLS.

But in this case, it is WORSE, because the Trump campaign got their help from the thieves, who were working with the Russian government Military Intelligence assigned by Putin to interfere and meddle in our democratic election process... they aided and abetted the enemy imo and many others too.

If Obama had done one tenth of what the Trump campaign and Trump has done, he would have been impeached by the Republicans already.

If Hillary was president and had done what the Trump campaign has done with working with Russia to bring Trump down, she would have been impeached already by this Republican congress.

If this were the times of respectable Republicans serving in congress as there were in Nixon's time, there would have been extensive, live on TV serious hearings before all of the citizens in this nation, and Trump would have been impeached by now.....

there is absolutely no way in the world you can deny that....

What did the emails show?
Where the **** have you been?
If they weren't true why did hillary and the DNC not once contest any of them?
Why did they refuse to turn over their servers?
I'll tell you why. Because the info on those servers would have corroborated what Essange has been saying all along.

You cant back up a single one of your ridiculous claims.

 

[Theowl32]

here is the latest ( but not the last ) round of indictments that go into detail about who, what, where, when, & how...

https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

you're welcome.

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

There is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server. That's what the DNC tells us, but we have no reason to believe it.

Read the latest indictments from the Justice
Dept, QTARD.

Indictments aren't evidence of anything, you stupid douchebag.

The best was how mewler and democrats indicted those 13 Russians originally, never expecting that they would answer them. They did it for political posturing and to satisfy the retarded democrat voting base.


Lol!!

They showed up and answered it. A big unexpected nightmare for mewler and the lying losers.

Their lawyers demanded to see the so called evidence, which there was none.

Funny ass shit. They are pathetic losers.

 

[Care4all]

here is the latest ( but not the last ) round of indictments that go into detail about who, what, where, when, & how...

https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

you're welcome.

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

There is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server. That's what the DNC tells us, but we have no reason to believe it.

Read the latest indictments from the Justice
Dept, QTARD.

Indictments aren't evidence of anything, you stupid douchebag.

The best was how mewler and democrats indicted those 13 Russians originally, never expecting that they would answer them. They did it for political posturing and to satisfy the retarded democrat voting base.


Lol!!

They showed up and answered it. A big unexpected nightmare for mewler and the lying losers.

Their lawyers demanded to see the so called evidence, which there was none.

Funny ass shit. They are pathetic losers.

that's not exactly what happened...

 

[bripat9643]

So 126,000,000 dems were influenced to vote Trump by some meme's and some facebook content?
Holy ****!!!!
You people really are stupid!!!

I've said it a thousand times for every time you right wingers make that stupid statement and if you had actually read the last indictment you would know this as well....

the goal was not to make people vote FOR Trump, though that may have happened... the goal was to get Bernie supporters to hate Hillary, and either not come out to vote, or to vote against her.... but it was primarily to suppress the Democratic voters from coming out to vote.... and it worked.

Hilary did that all on her own.

nope, she actually did not... it was spurred and fueled by the Russian hacks and timed leaks and propaganda articles that tied in with the releases of the stolen merchandise.

Assange was screaming and yelling at the Russian hackers to get the stolen emails to him QUICKLY so Assange could release them with the negative propaganda news articles that they prepared to spin a story at the same time of the release.... SAYING that he, Assange, wanted to release them before the Democratic Convention, for the most impact in his and the Russian's goal of dividing Bernie supporters and Hillary supporters....

it worked.

Merchandise? Not sure you know what that word means.

Assange has stated repeatedly that the leaks did not come from the Russians. But thats really beside the point.

You're pissed that hillary got exposed for who she is. A crooked *****!!!

Here's a clue, it didn't expose anything... What you got from it, is propaganda articles that Assange along with a Journalist who he allowed to read the parts Assange highlighted of the emails ahead of time, and delivered a pure propaganda article spun in the negative....

Just show me ANY thing that you believed was shown from ANY of the emails,

and I will show you, how the spin on it, was not completely true or not true at all....

But you can't even SHOW what the emails exposed, yet you keep repeating the same propaganda that the emails showed how rotten Hillary was....

So what did these emails say, that you refer to?

And I am upset that their private emails of both the campaign and DNC were stolen, anyone should be! It's a BREAK IN just like Watergate, and the President, just like Nixon, is involved in a COVER-UP, TO HIS EYEBALLS.

But in this case, it is WORSE, because the Trump campaign got their help from the thieves, who were working with the Russian government Military Intelligence assigned by Putin to interfere and meddle in our democratic election process... they aided and abetted the enemy imo and many others too.

If Obama had done one tenth of what the Trump campaign and Trump has done, he would have been impeached by the Republicans already.

If Hillary was president and had done what the Trump campaign has done with working with Russia to bring Trump down, she would have been impeached already by this Republican congress.

If this were the times of respectable Republicans serving in congress as there were in Nixon's time, there would have been extensive, live on TV serious hearings before all of the citizens in this nation, and Trump would have been impeached by now.....

there is absolutely no way in the world you can deny that....

The emails were published in their entirety. No one in the fake media or the Hillary campaign contested their accuracy.

You lose, douchebag.

 

[bripat9643]

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

There is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server. That's what the DNC tells us, but we have no reason to believe it.

Read the latest indictments from the Justice
Dept, QTARD.

Indictments aren't evidence of anything, you stupid douchebag.

The best was how mewler and democrats indicted those 13 Russians originally, never expecting that they would answer them. They did it for political posturing and to satisfy the retarded democrat voting base.


Lol!!

They showed up and answered it. A big unexpected nightmare for mewler and the lying losers.

Their lawyers demanded to see the so called evidence, which there was none.

Funny ass shit. They are pathetic losers.

that's not what happened...

That is exactly what happened.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

so they released the truth from documents found in the unsecure DNC server?

1. why wasn't the server secure?
2. if looking at data on an unsecure server is a crime, what is the crime?

So putting these emails out for public view helped Hillary to lose? Is that the claim?

There is no evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC server. That's what the DNC tells us, but we have no reason to believe it.

Read the latest indictments from the Justice
Dept, QTARD.

Indictments aren't evidence of anything, you stupid douchebag.

The best was how mewler and democrats indicted those 13 Russians originally, never expecting that they would answer them. They did it for political posturing and to satisfy the retarded democrat voting base.


Lol!!

They showed up and answered it. A big unexpected nightmare for mewler and the lying losers.

Their lawyers demanded to see the so called evidence, which there was none.

Funny ass shit. They are pathetic losers.

that's not what happened...

So what happened with the indictments and when is the trial?

 

[Slade3200]

We hear that the DNC was hacked by the Russians, yet the DNC never turned over the servers to show the hacks..

And there has been zero proof that Russians hacked the elections or changed any votes.

If the crime is running propaganda ads then the far left media should be arrested as well..

Yes they were hacked. Even Trump admits it.

“The DNC should be ashamed of themselves for allowing themselves to be hacked. They had bad defenses, and they were able to be hacked,” Trump said in a CBS News interview with Jeff Glor, aired Sunday on "Face the Nation." “I heard they were trying to hack the Republicans, too. But, and this may be wrong, but they had much stronger defenses.”

Trump is going off of what the intel communities have said.

Yeah and he can see he evidence any time he wants. If he or they felt that the evidence wasn’t convincing then they would say so, but they don’t

 

[RetiredGySgt]

come on, are you saying that wikileaks only published information damaging to Hillary? The Rich murder raises some valid questions, as does the Vince Foster suicide and the Ron Brown plane crash. We are entitled to know the truth. Are you afraid of the truth?

Some of the craziness that repeated enough times makes people believe it

Hear the one about Hillary and the pizza shop sex slaves?

That is what Hillary had to deal with..........Actual Fake News

I didn't pay much attention to that type of nonsense and I doubt that many others did either. I did however, pay a lot of attention to the emails showing that the democrat primary was rigged and to the fact that the MSM was meeting with HIllary to outline their "strategy".

The primary was not rigged and Hillary actually received the most votes

Something Crooked Donnie cannot say

were you unconscious during 2016? the dem super delegates overrode the votes of the dem primary voters in order to deny Bernie and give the nomination to crooked Hillary.

the entire PV vote delta was in California. 3 million more caliprunians voted for Hillary than for Trump, BFD, Trump got 306 EC votes and that's how we elect presidents.

Hillary won the popular vote, she won the most states, she won the most delegates

She did NOT win the most States dumb ass. Trump won 30 of 50 which leaves 20 for Hillary 20 is less then 30 unless you are using new math genius.

 

[Dragonlady]

We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.

this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?

Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?

Read the indictments against the Russians. Those indictments outline in vivid detail exactly what they did and how they did it.

 

[Slade3200]

Some of the craziness that repeated enough times makes people believe it

Hear the one about Hillary and the pizza shop sex slaves?

That is what Hillary had to deal with..........Actual Fake News

I didn't pay much attention to that type of nonsense and I doubt that many others did either. I did however, pay a lot of attention to the emails showing that the democrat primary was rigged and to the fact that the MSM was meeting with HIllary to outline their "strategy".

The primary was not rigged and Hillary actually received the most votes

Something Crooked Donnie cannot say

were you unconscious during 2016? the dem super delegates overrode the votes of the dem primary voters in order to deny Bernie and give the nomination to crooked Hillary.

the entire PV vote delta was in California. 3 million more caliprunians voted for Hillary than for Trump, BFD, Trump got 306 EC votes and that's how we elect presidents.

Hillary won the popular vote, she won the most states, she won the most delegates

She did NOT win the most States dumb ass. Trump won 30 of 50 which leaves 20 for Hillary 20 is less then 30 unless you are using new math genius.

Who gives a shit? Trump won, hillary lost. More people voted for Hillary. Trump won more states and electoral votes. Time to move on.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.

this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?

Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?

Read the latest indicments, dope.

Playing dumb only makes you appear dumb.

The indictments do not say anything about trump or his people, they do not involve collusion at all. They claim some Russians broke into Hillary's server, perhaps she should have had some security? They claim the Russians broke into Podesta server perhaps he should have had some security?

 

[Slade3200]

We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.

this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?

Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?

Read the latest indicments, dope.

Playing dumb only makes you appear dumb.

The indictments do not say anything about trump or his people, they do not involve collusion at all. They claim some Russians broke into Hillary's server, perhaps she should have had some security? They claim the Russians broke into Podesta server perhaps he should have had some security?

Yes they should of had better security. But why are so many people saying that the hacking never happened? Just look at this thread and all the deniers of the Russians efforts.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

We keep hearing from all sides that the Russians interfered with our 2016 election, but I have yet to hear any of them say exactly what the Russians did, where they did it, or which votes were influenced by it.

this is a serious inquiry, what did they Russians do? where, when, to who? which states?

Heir Mewler cant find anything, the IG cant find anything. So someone tell us, what did they do?

Read the latest indicments, dope.

Playing dumb only makes you appear dumb.

The indictments do not say anything about trump or his people, they do not involve collusion at all. They claim some Russians broke into Hillary's server, perhaps she should have had some security? They claim the Russians broke into Podesta server perhaps he should have had some security?

Yes they should of had better security. But why are so many people saying that the hacking never happened? Just look at this thread and all the deniers of the Russians efforts.

Several reasons. ONE Wikilinks DENIES they got the info from a hack, two Hillary and Podesta REFUSED to turn over the servers..