What Exactly are the High Crimes and Misdemeanors Trump Is Being Charged With?

[Weatherman2020]

So your entire case relies upon one witness who you now say lied under oath when he was not aware of any pressure on the FBI for political purposes in his entire career.

Every jury is given the same instructions - if a witness has been determined to lie once, you may assume all other testimony is false.

Run with it, Pablo, run!

Up until Trump fired Comey he didn't feel any political pressure. Comeys firing changed everything.

it did? how?

Soros told him.

 

[rightwinger]

You lie about anything under oath in a court of law and you deserve impeachment. That should be the current setting of the bar.

LOL Trump is DOOMED

Imagine if they ask Trump how many attended his inauguration. Or if his executive order was a muslim ban.

Or why did he fire Comey when he did.

247 posts now and the left can't even name a crime they are accusing Trump of.

What a bunch of psychotic losers.

Obstruction of Justice was named - long ago, on the first page, in post #3.

So your entire case relies upon one witness who you now say lied under oath when he was not aware of any pressure on the FBI for political purposes in his entire career.

Every jury is given the same instructions - if a witness has been determined to lie once, you may assume all other testimony is false.

Run with it, Pablo, run!

If that s the case....I can't wait to see Trump on the stand

 

[Weatherman2020]

LOL Trump is DOOMED

Imagine if they ask Trump how many attended his inauguration. Or if his executive order was a muslim ban.

Or why did he fire Comey when he did.

247 posts now and the left can't even name a crime they are accusing Trump of.

What a bunch of psychotic losers.

Obstruction of Justice was named - long ago, on the first page, in post #3.

So your entire case relies upon one witness who you now say lied under oath when he was not aware of any pressure on the FBI for political purposes in his entire career.

Every jury is given the same instructions - if a witness has been determined to lie once, you may assume all other testimony is false.

Run with it, Pablo, run!

If that s the case....I can't wait to see Trump on the stand

Dufus thinks Congress will ask Trump to go on the stand.

 

[Boss]

Lets play a game called "connect the dots"

• Russia hacked the DNC server
• Trump benefitted from that hack
• Trump used the information obtained from the Russians to attack Hillary
• Trumps aides had meetings with the Russians while this was going on
• Trump offered policy concessions for the Russians
• Trump aides did not report and denied meetings with the Russians

Republicans want us to stop investigating after the first dot

First of all, guilt cannot be established through connection of dots. You must have hard evidence which doesn't doesn't require dot connecting. Hillary would have been in prison a LONG time ago if we could convict people this way. So we begin with you having absolutely no concept of how justice works.

Secondly, you have no substantiation for the claims you're making. We don't know if Russia hacked a DNC server. The Russians claim they didn't and it's very much possible that whoever did, made it appear to be the Russians. Podesta's emails weren't hacked, his email account was phished (not hacked). This is Podesta's fault for being a moron.

We don't know if this "helped Trump" or not. That's a speculation. You're assuming that it did because it was devastating information against Hillary and the DNC. We're still a far cry from Trump committing some kind of crime. Being the beneficiary of the fallout of vast corruption from the other side isn't a crime. Nor is it a crime to use that in an ongoing political campaign.

Some Trump aids did have meetings with some Russians. There is no crime in meeting with Russians. You have zero evidence that Trump offered any policy concessions to the Russians but it doesn't matter anyway because that's also not a crime. Obama made all kinds of policy concessions with the Iranians through back channels before he took office.

And again... on your final point, meeting with Russians is not a crime. Flynn inadvertently filled out the wrong form in reporting and that is about all you have against him. But Flynn isn't Trump.

So you really don't have anything and after over a year of investigation, you've not turned up anything. In the process, countless laws have been broken in leaking classified information, unmasking the names of private citizens, wiretaps and surveillance that wasn't authorized properly and in flagrant violation of the Constitution. Someone needs to go to jail but it's not Trump.

 

[rightwinger]

Imagine if they ask Trump how many attended his inauguration. Or if his executive order was a muslim ban.

Or why did he fire Comey when he did.

247 posts now and the left can't even name a crime they are accusing Trump of.

What a bunch of psychotic losers.

Obstruction of Justice was named - long ago, on the first page, in post #3.

So your entire case relies upon one witness who you now say lied under oath when he was not aware of any pressure on the FBI for political purposes in his entire career.

Every jury is given the same instructions - if a witness has been determined to lie once, you may assume all other testimony is false.

Run with it, Pablo, run!

If that s the case....I can't wait to see Trump on the stand

Dufus thinks Congress will ask Trump to go on the stand.

Clinton did it
Reagan did it

 

[Boss]

If that s the case....I can't wait to see Trump on the stand

Well you won't ever see that because President's enjoy executive immunity.

Damn boy.... have you never studied the Constitution at all?

 

[bendog]

If only blowing Putin was still a crime.

 

[rightwinger]

Lets play a game called "connect the dots"

• Russia hacked the DNC server
• Trump benefitted from that hack
• Trump used the information obtained from the Russians to attack Hillary
• Trumps aides had meetings with the Russians while this was going on
• Trump offered policy concessions for the Russians
• Trump aides did not report and denied meetings with the Russians

Republicans want us to stop investigating after the first dot

First of all, guilt cannot be established through connection of dots. You must have hard evidence which doesn't doesn't require dot connecting. Hillary would have been in prison a LONG time ago if we could convict people this way. So we begin with you having absolutely no concept of how justice works.

Secondly, you have no substantiation for the claims you're making. We don't know if Russia hacked a DNC server. The Russians claim they didn't and it's very much possible that whoever did, made it appear to be the Russians. Podesta's emails weren't hacked, his email account was phished (not hacked). This is Podesta's fault for being a moron.

We don't know if this "helped Trump" or not. That's a speculation. You're assuming that it did because it was devastating information against Hillary and the DNC. We're still a far cry from Trump committing some kind of crime. Being the beneficiary of the fallout of vast corruption from the other side isn't a crime. Nor is it a crime to use that in an ongoing political campaign.

Some Trump aids did have meetings with some Russians. There is no crime in meeting with Russians. You have zero evidence that Trump offered any policy concessions to the Russians but it doesn't matter anyway because that's also not a crime. Obama made all kinds of policy concessions with the Iranians through back channels before he took office.

And again... on your final point, meeting with Russians is not a crime. Flynn inadvertently filled out the wrong form in reporting and that is about all you have against him. But Flynn isn't Trump.

So you really don't have anything and after over a year of investigation, you've not turned up anything. In the process, countless laws have been broken in leaking classified information, unmasking the names of private citizens, wiretaps and surveillance that wasn't authorized properly and in flagrant violation of the Constitution. Someone needs to go to jail but it's not Trump.

Once and for all......Russia DID hack the server
Even Putin admitted as much yesterday....Trump ADMITS it happened

Meeting with Russians is no crime. But given the circumstances, it could be

That is why we need an investigation

 

[Weatherman2020]

247 posts now and the left can't even name a crime they are accusing Trump of.

What a bunch of psychotic losers.

Obstruction of Justice was named - long ago, on the first page, in post #3.

So your entire case relies upon one witness who you now say lied under oath when he was not aware of any pressure on the FBI for political purposes in his entire career.

Every jury is given the same instructions - if a witness has been determined to lie once, you may assume all other testimony is false.

Run with it, Pablo, run!

If that s the case....I can't wait to see Trump on the stand

Dufus thinks Congress will ask Trump to go on the stand.

Clinton did it
Reagan did it

Crimes were being investigated. And they never appeared in a court.

 

[Boss]

Clinton did it
Reagan did it

No, they didn't.

Clinton gave a deposition in a case that was unrelated to his position.
Reagan volunteered to give a deposition in the Iran Contra hearing.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Clinton did it
Reagan did it

No, they didn't.

Clinton gave a deposition in a case that was unrelated to his position.
Reagan volunteered to give a deposition in the Iran Contra hearing.

Facts and the left shall never meet.

 

[Boss]

Once and for all......Russia DID hack the server
Even Putin admitted as much yesterday....Trump ADMITS it happened

Meeting with Russians is no crime. But given the circumstances, it could be

That is why we need an investigation

I didn't hear Putin admit anything. Got a link that's not CNN, NYT or WaPo?

We don't know who did the hacking... it appears to be Russians. Might be, might not be.

How is Trump guilty of a crime there???

There is no circumstance where meeting with a Russian is a crime.

You've got an investigation, dipwad! It's not going to uncover anything because there isn't anything to uncover criminally. With the exception of how our national security apparatus has been abused by the previous administration to spy on political enemies. THAT is the Big Scandal here and it wouldn't surprise me if the Special Counsel very swiftly included that in the scope of his investigation. Careful what you wish for... especially when you're corrupt up to your eyeballs.

 

[Wry Catcher]

For some strange reason no one has been able/willing to articulate anything beyond THE RUSSIANS!

Well, we are not at war with Russia, we can talk to Russians anytime, and the President determines what is and is not secret at his will.

Now if you want to go down the path of Russia helped Trump, how about the billions China gave Bill Clinton for his election?

Q. What Exactly are the High Crimes and Misdemeanors Trump Is Being Charged With?

A. PERJURY. When Trump took the oath of office, he was required to tell the truth, his actions as POTUS have created credible evidence that he lied when he repeated these words:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Now, I'm not suggesting the Senate would convict him of Perjury, but it is clear he is the most Authoritarian POTUS in our history, and has chosen to attack the press and a religion - both protected by the First Amendment; and undermined a long established (NATO) treaty, an action which provide aid and comfort to Putin and the Russian Military.

A.2 Article I, sec. 9, Clause 8 by accepting emoluments from foreign states; and Article II, sec. 7, Clause 7 which states the POTUS shall not receive ... any other emolument from the United States or any of them.

This as of now. Let's wait and see what the decision are from the H. of Rep. committees, the Senate committees and the Special Council on all other pending questions.

 

[Darkwind]

For some strange reason no one has been able/willing to articulate anything beyond THE RUSSIANS!

Well, we are not at war with Russia, we can talk to Russians anytime, and the President determines what is and is not secret at his will.

Now if you want to go down the path of Russia helped Trump, how about the billions China gave Bill Clinton for his election?

Better yet, how about the millions that helped Clinton. She is against the Russians because she lost. If she had won, you can bet that not a peep about Russia would be heard from her or her advocates at CNN, NYT's, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, or NBC.

 

[Darkwind]

For some strange reason no one has been able/willing to articulate anything beyond THE RUSSIANS!

Well, we are not at war with Russia, we can talk to Russians anytime, and the President determines what is and is not secret at his will.

Now if you want to go down the path of Russia helped Trump, how about the billions China gave Bill Clinton for his election?

Q. What Exactly are the High Crimes and Misdemeanors Trump Is Being Charged With?

A. PERJURY. When Trump took the oath of office, he was required to tell the truth, his actions as POTUS have created credible evidence that he lied when he repeated these words:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Now, I'm not suggesting the Senate would convict him of Perjury, but it is clear he is the most Authoritarian POTUS in our history, and has chosen to attack the press and a religion - both protected by the First Amendment; and undermined a long established (NATO) treaty, an action which provide aid and comfort to Putin and the Russian Military.

A.2 Article I, sec. 9, Clause 8 by accepting emoluments from foreign states; and Article II, sec. 7, Clause 7 which states the POTUS shall not receive ... any other emolument from the United States or any of them.

This as of now. Let's wait and see what the decision are from the H. of Rep. committees, the Senate committees and the Special Council on all other pending questions.

 

[CowboyTed]

Obstruction of Justice...

There is other things but he fired Comey over Russia and he admitted to it...

That's not true. According to testimony from Comey and McCabe, there was no attempt to obstruct. NONE! In fact, the investigation continues to this day so it has not been obstructed. Trump fired Comey because he is incompetent.

It is from his own mouth, he admitted that he fired Comey over Russia. Because ti was successful or not, or McCabe looked at it or not doesn't matter... Simply put he said he fired Comey cause he thought it would get rid of Russia and even bragged to the Russians about it...

Being stupid doesn't make him innocent...

 

[CowboyTed]

Yes he fired Comey over the fact that he could no stop him from investigating Russia. That's is where the obstruction of justice comes in.

Comey was Director, not an investigator. The intelligence investigation of Russia continued on in the absence of Comey, the director. So Trump's action had nothing to do with stopping the investigation that still continues to this day. What mental patient did you get this viewpoint from?

That just shows how ignorant of the FBI Trump is (and any law enforcement agency) but he did fire Comey and stated the Russian investigation was the reason.

What is really funny is he could have given no reason but the ass couldn't resist...

 

[Weatherman2020]

For some strange reason no one has been able/willing to articulate anything beyond THE RUSSIANS!

Well, we are not at war with Russia, we can talk to Russians anytime, and the President determines what is and is not secret at his will.

Now if you want to go down the path of Russia helped Trump, how about the billions China gave Bill Clinton for his election?

Q. What Exactly are the High Crimes and Misdemeanors Trump Is Being Charged With?

A. PERJURY. When Trump took the oath of office, he was required to tell the truth, his actions as POTUS have created credible evidence that he lied when he repeated these words:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Now, I'm not suggesting the Senate would convict him of Perjury, but it is clear he is the most Authoritarian POTUS in our history, and has chosen to attack the press and a religion - both protected by the First Amendment; and undermined a long established (NATO) treaty, an action which provide aid and comfort to Putin and the Russian Military.

A.2 Article I, sec. 9, Clause 8 by accepting emoluments from foreign states; and Article II, sec. 7, Clause 7 which states the POTUS shall not receive ... any other emolument from the United States or any of them.

This as of now. Let's wait and see what the decision are from the H. of Rep. committees, the Senate committees and the Special Council on all other pending questions.

View attachment 130434

Once again the left have set themselves up for major disappointment.

But they won't be around long enough, they will drown in the rising oceans of the Left Coast by next week thanks to Trump dumping the Paris Climate scam.

 

[CowboyTed]

For some strange reason no one has been able/willing to articulate anything beyond THE RUSSIANS!

Well, we are not at war with Russia, we can talk to Russians anytime, and the President determines what is and is not secret at his will.

Now if you want to go down the path of Russia helped Trump, how about the billions China gave Bill Clinton for his election?

Trumps crimes are nothing compared to getting a blowjob but could evolve to charges of obstruction and treason

The real question is how much the Martians gave Reagan for his election... Bloody Martians...

 

[Weatherman2020]

Dems trying to nudge Comey out at FBI after Clinton probe decision

The Democrats Have Been Demanding Comey Be Fired for the Clinton Email Debacle, They Should Be Happy Now

Calls For FBI Director James Comey To Resign Spread Across The U.S.

Democrats declare open season on Jim Comey

Senate Democrats BLAST James Comey