What do you know that these leaders do not?

We spent more on Israel.
And don't get shit.


Poor arabs. How will they survive.


1755772299471.webp
 
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • France
  • Germany
  • Finland
  • European Commission
  • NATO
As I think we all know, all of them have a deep and personal understanding of European history, aggressive dictators and WAR. All of them have made their positions on Putin abundantly clear: Putin is the aggressor and must be stopped and forced to pay a price for his war.

MORE FAKE NEWS based on bankrupts being able to deliver more than Hot Air and threats .

These bankrupts are naturally desperate to keep Russia as a Fake aggressor because there is presently no other way for them to make money and support their debts .

However , they have a huge extra conflicting problem, because they no longer fully set and then dictate narratives .

That has become impossible with over 50% of the world against them ( BRICS PLUS ).
And their biggest location for making money( Ukraine ) is ruled by Russia the moving force behind BRICS Plus .

Now this situation is worsening by the day as they have no remaining fighting force and can do almost nothing to help the existing thin defence line .
Russia is even trampling everywhere that remains of importance -----Kharkiv , Lyiv , Odessa and Kyiv itself .

Regardless, those OP listed organisations are still desperate and will do anything to hold on to previous days of imagined glory and power.
Even though those days are gone forever .

Nothing actually remains except bluster and threats--- they have become hot air and BS machines.
And Russia marches on with Poodles nursing a secret smile .
 
If we were talking about a game, then the resolution for the Good Guys would be clear and unambiguous: Russia must be forced to withdraw its forces to the previous borders, including those sections taken since 2014.

But this will not happen as long as Putin is alive and in control of Russia. EVERYBODY knows this. Indeed, Our Beloved President seems willing to give Russia every square meter that they have taken so far, as well as some aspired-to territory that he is still trying to take.

And NOBODY, American or European, is willing to do what is necessary to get him and his forces out. It is said to be the nuclear threat, but that's not real. Civilized countries will no longer put their armed forces into battles where casualties are a certainty. They will risk casualties, but not accept casualties. It is an entirely new paradigm that nobody speaks out loud. It is the paradigm that is manifested by comparing casualty figures from Afghanistan and Vietnam or Korea. They are down by 90% (figuratively) despite the conflict lasting much longer.

"We" cannot win a conflict where the other side doesn't care about casualties. Check out what's going on in the Holy Land. Israel kicks the shit out of Hamas, but it cannot win because Hamas literally does not care about casualties, and Israel does. The same is happening in Ukraine. Russia is getting the shit kicked out of it - casualty numbers confirm this - but Ukraine cannot win. Europe could not win. Europe + the U.S. could not win. Because Russia doesn't care about casualties and simply will never surrender.
 
At a macro level, the "boots on the ground" part of this is going as it should. The Europeans have to talk about it because he's at their doorstep. But America can't go that far and risk its own lives. Trump is right to make that a red line.
Eastern Europe and Russia like other hot spots of the world have always paid a price in lives.
 
While American politics, American political parties, and American political leaders are squabbling over our role in the situation in Ukraine, leaders of the following European countries and organizations met with Trump in the last few days, all of them in full support of Ukraine and its efforts against Russia:
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • France
  • Germany
  • Finland
  • European Commission
  • NATO
As I think we all know, all of them have a deep and personal understanding of European history, aggressive dictators and WAR. All of them have made their positions on Putin abundantly clear: Putin is the aggressor and must be stopped and forced to pay a price for his war.

And yet, many in America are certain that they understand the Russia/Ukraine situation and history better than these people. So if you don't think this is our problem, I'm not sure why Trump should be involved in any way.

How have those of you who oppose these efforts become more informed than these people, exactly? Your sources must be incredible and immaculate. So please provide some informed clarification on this terribly difficult situation.

Who are the European leaders meeting with Trump and Zelenskyy?

They "support" Ukraine? With supporters like that who needs enemies?
 
Last edited:
The question is why the US has to foot the bill for the war and the European Countries don't?

Aid flows to Ukraine shifted significantly in March and April 2025. While the United States allocated no new aid during this period, European countries increased their support. As a result, Europe has, for the first time since June 2022, surpassed the U.S. in total military aid, totaling EUR 72 billion compared to EUR 65 billion from the U.S. However, the increase has not been evenly distributed across Europe. Countries such as the Nordics and the United Kingdom have markedly stepped up their aid, while others, such as Germany, have maintained more moderate levels. These are among the key findings from the latest update of the Ukraine Support Tracker, which includes data through April 2025.

Perhaps now would be a good time to ask yourself how you became so misinformed? Is it willful ignorance by virtue of the sources of info you use? Bias from your political persuasion? Think about it.
 
While American politics, American political parties, and American political leaders are squabbling over our role in the situation in Ukraine, leaders of the following European countries and organizations met with Trump in the last few days, all of them in full support of Ukraine and its efforts against Russia:
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • France
  • Germany
  • Finland
  • European Commission
  • NATO
As I think we all know, all of them have a deep and personal understanding of European history, aggressive dictators and WAR. All of them have made their positions on Putin abundantly clear: Putin is the aggressor and must be stopped and forced to pay a price for his war.

And yet, many in America are certain that they understand the Russia/Ukraine situation and history better than these people. So if you don't think this is our problem, I'm not sure why Trump should be involved in any way.

How have those of you who oppose these efforts become more informed than these people, exactly? Your sources must be incredible and immaculate. So please provide some informed clarification on this terribly difficult situation.

Who are the European leaders meeting with Trump and Zelenskyy?

Let those super-smart Europeans fund the war then.
 
While American politics, American political parties, and American political leaders are squabbling over our role in the situation in Ukraine, leaders of the following European countries and organizations met with Trump in the last few days, all of them in full support of Ukraine and its efforts against Russia:
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • France
  • Germany
  • Finland
  • European Commission
  • NATO
As I think we all know, all of them have a deep and personal understanding of European history, aggressive dictators and WAR. All of them have made their positions on Putin abundantly clear: Putin is the aggressor and must be stopped and forced to pay a price for his war.

And yet, many in America are certain that they understand the Russia/Ukraine situation and history better than these people. So if you don't think this is our problem, I'm not sure why Trump should be involved in any way.

How have those of you who oppose these efforts become more informed than these people, exactly? Your sources must be incredible and immaculate. So please provide some informed clarification on this terribly difficult situation.

Who are the European leaders meeting with Trump and Zelenskyy?
They "know" what right wing media tells them. Just like they "know" trump won in 2020 because Faux said so.

In one text message, Mr. Watters, who now hosts “Jesse Watters Primetime” on Fox News, said to his colleague Greg Gutfeld: “Think about how incredible our ratings would be if Fox went ALL in on STOP THE STEAL,” a reference to the movement trying to overturn the results of the election.
 
mac how come all the lefties agree with you but none of the other side do?....i dont even see middle of the roaders agreeing with you.......just asking...:dunno:
 
go ahead ignore the fact that the us spent billions more than the European countries combined and then get back to us.
American non-com style. Often wrong, never uncertain.

How much has the US spent in total?

The US has spent a total of $130.6bn (£98.9bn) between 24 January 2022 and 30 June 2025, according to the Kiel Institute, a Germany-based think tank that tracks international support for Ukraine.
The US Department of Defense has provided its own figure looking at all spending on Operation Atlantic Resolve - a response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
It says $184.8bn has been "appropriated" - a figure that covers US military training in Europe and replenishment of US defence stocks.
[...]

How does US spending compare to Europe?

Between January 2022 and the end of June 2025, Europe as a whole spent $165.7bn on Ukraine, compared to the US's $130.6bn over the same period, according to Kiel Institute calculations.
 
15th post
American non-com style. Often wrong, never uncertain.

How much has the US spent in total?

The US has spent a total of $130.6bn (£98.9bn) between 24 January 2022 and 30 June 2025, according to the Kiel Institute, a Germany-based think tank that tracks international support for Ukraine.
The US Department of Defense has provided its own figure looking at all spending on Operation Atlantic Resolve - a response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
It says $184.8bn has been "appropriated" - a figure that covers US military training in Europe and replenishment of US defence stocks.
[...]

How does US spending compare to Europe?

Between January 2022 and the end of June 2025, Europe as a whole spent $165.7bn on Ukraine, compared to the US's $130.6bn over the same period, according to Kiel Institute calculations.


nothing stopping europe from telling us to **** off.


If Europe and zelenski told us that we were not needed, Trump would drop them like a hot potatoe and the America voter would be fine with that.


And tehy could soak the soil of hte ukraine with as much blood as they want, for as long as they want, with no one saying boo about it.


So, ... any time you're ready.
 
mac how come all the lefties agree with you but none of the other side do?....i dont even see middle of the roaders agreeing with you.......just asking...:dunno:
Because you've decided anyone whom agrees with Mac is a lefty, I suppose.
 
Back
Top Bottom