What do normal people - think of Israel?

Ah yes the BBC poll again that only had 4 questions and each one weighted against Isreal
But not weighted against Iran or North Korea or any of the other countries in the poll?

No worries, normal people think Israel casts itself as a victim of persecution.

Can you imagine why?




ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA which is failing after hamas put the lives of journalists and civilians in danger by firing rockets from close proximity to the hotels and homes.

Have you even seen the poll and what was asked, and the numbers people asked in a "world wide survey", and why even the BBC had to admit that it was ANTISEMITIC in the way the 4 questions were worded.
 
Sorry, I can't stand Delingpole, the expert on everything. From his writings on subjects I know something about it is obvious he has no credibility at all.

This is interesting, he just regurgitates Zarhan's blog as "fact":

"These quotes were collected by Mudar Zarhan, a Jordanian-Palestinian writer and activist at the Gatestone Institute, who used his contacts in the West Bank to secure secret interviews with friends and family members in Gaza. All spoke anonymously because of the understandable fear that if their identities were revealed they would face execution by the ruthless Hamas regime."

"All spoke anonymously because of the understandable fear that if their identities were revealed they would face execution by the ruthless Hamas regime." That's convenient, it could also mean the whole thing was made up by the Ministry of Hasbara and no-one could prove otherwise. Also "...friends and family members"? So all Hamas has to do is go round where the Zarhan family lives and kill them all (assuming the IDF/IAF haven't got there first); so what's the point of speaking anonymously? Publicity is the best if not only, defence in these circumstances.
 
Yes....and so???
So normal people think Israel imposes dietary restrictions as a collective punishment. Otherwise there would be no restrictions on foodstuffs.




Only if they read this board and the untruths posted by team Palestine. When the truth is they allowed more than enough food to enter gaza to fulfil the requirements as laid down by the WHO, and did not take into account the locally grown food. You don't see many starving gazans with distended stomachs do you.
 
From the survey we see this

This being the first time Israel was included in the list of countries rated in the survey, there is no evidence that current ratings are better or worse than historical views.


So why was Israel slipped in at that time ?

Because that was when the survey was being held?

Or to persecute Israel?

You be the judge.




So nothing to do with the rabid ANTISEMITISM running through the BBC at the time
 
Sorry, I can't stand Delingpole, the expert on everything. From his writings on subjects I know something about it is obvious he has no credibility at all.




How about the source for the reports then Mudar Zarhan, a Jordanian-Palestinian writer and activist at the Gatestone Institute. Just another nail in the coffin of hamas that will soon be ignored because of the many truths now coming out of gaza
 
So nothing to do with the rabid ANTISEMITISM running through the BBC at the time
I see you choose 'persecution' as the reason for the inclusion of Israel in a poll. Normal people are not surprised.
 
Only if they read this board and the untruths posted by team Palestine. When the truth is they allowed more than enough food to enter gaza to fulfil the requirements as laid down by the WHO, and did not take into account the locally grown food. You don't see many starving gazans with distended stomachs do you.
So you agree Israel restricted foodstuffs from entering?
 
15th post
Sorry, I can't stand Delingpole, the expert on everything. From his writings on subjects I know something about it is obvious he has no credibility at all.

This is interesting, he just regurgitates Zarhan's blog as "fact":

"These quotes were collected by Mudar Zarhan, a Jordanian-Palestinian writer and activist at the Gatestone Institute, who used his contacts in the West Bank to secure secret interviews with friends and family members in Gaza. All spoke anonymously because of the understandable fear that if their identities were revealed they would face execution by the ruthless Hamas regime."

"All spoke anonymously because of the understandable fear that if their identities were revealed they would face execution by the ruthless Hamas regime." That's convenient, it could also mean the whole thing was made up by the Ministry of Hasbara and no-one could prove otherwise. Also "...friends and family members"? So all Hamas has to do is go round where the Zarhan family lives and kill them all (assuming the IDF/IAF haven't got there first); so what's the point of speaking anonymously? Publicity is the best if not only, defence in these circumstances.





What about the journalists reports showing hamas fired rockets from right outside their hotel, or the intimidations and threats used to alter journalists copy when it told the truth about hamas.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom