King did not rip off Lovecraft. The other (crappy) horror novelist tries to, but he does it badly. Dean Koontz? I hate that guy's stuff.
King created his own genre. It's closer to Poe than Lovecraft...or maybe a morphing of the two, with a little Bram Stoker thrown in. It's completely his own.
And Conan is not goody-goody. Robert Howard, who was apparently mentally ill, wrote Conan under the misapprehension that Conan was actually standing behind him with sword raised to chop off his head if he stopped writing.
My bookshelf as of today:
The Qu'ran (I haven't really read it yet, it's written in Arabic or whatever and then in English, and is backwards, and I'm having trouble trying to make that work for me. I don't see me getting through it).
Bias.
Mother Earth Father Sky or something like that, about a woman somewhere around 7500 BC, but that one's finished
Duchess, a novel about Georgiana Cavendish, Duchess of Devonshire, by Amanda Forman (2001?). It was actually a pretty good read but I'm crazy history (and it is historical, it's not a novel).
Who Wrote the Bible, but I read about two pages and got pissed and don't think I'll finish it. It's essentially yet another book written with no intent to actually discover anything, but rather to debunk with no interest in actually finding anything out.
I can't remember what else I have there.