What are WMDs ???

patrickcaturday

Active Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
775
Reaction score
143
Points
28
Location
Rep System: Opted back in for a while.
WORDS ARE TRICKY THINGS ???


I have been watching CNN, something I usually do when I can't sleep around 5 in the morning, the last couple of days and I have been hearing something that baffles me. They describe the bombs that were used in Boston as Weapons of Mass Destruction. Now correct me if I am wrong but weren't those words in the past used to describe Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical weapons. If we are going to dumb the words down in one case then shouldn't we also call the cluster munitions, WP rounds, and 1000lb bombs that Israel uses the same thing, WMDs.
 
Last edited:
WORDS ARE TRICKY THINGS ???


I have been watching CNN, something I usually do when I can't sleep around 5 in the morning, the last couple of days and I have been hearing something that baffles me. They describe the bombs that were used in Boston as Weapons of Mass Destruction. Now correct me if I am wrong but weren't those words in the past used to describe Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical weapons. If we are going to dumb the words down in one case then shouldn't we also call the cluster munitions, WP rounds, and 1000lb bombs that Israel uses the same thing, WMDs.


You are right caturday-----words are very important That is why
the blarney stone is holy. Weapons of mass destruction are weapons
that kill lots of people I am not the most brilliant person in the world
(really---you need not contradict that statement) but ----when Bush
et al-----used the term WMD -----I did not think NUCLEAR BOMB----
in fact---sadaam had been engaging in MASS DESTRUCTION for
years prior to Bush's use of the term--

Yes---the pressure cooker bomb was a weapon of mass destruction

the islamo nazi adolf abu ali----was--HIMSELF a weapon of
mass destruction------in 1915---the turkish army was
a weapon or mass destruction against the armenians---
the minions of Genghis Khan constituted a WEAPON OF
MASS DESTRUCTION
 
WORDS ARE TRICKY THINGS ???


I have been watching CNN, something I usually do when I can't sleep around 5 in the morning, the last couple of days and I have been hearing something that baffles me. They describe the bombs that were used in Boston as Weapons of Mass Destruction. Now correct me if I am wrong but weren't those words in the past used to describe Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical weapons. If we are going to dumb the words down in one case then shouldn't we also call the cluster munitions, WP rounds, and 1000lb bombs that Israel uses the same thing, WMDs.


You are right caturday-----words are very important That is why
the blarney stone is holy. Weapons of mass destruction are weapons
that kill lots of people I am not the most brilliant person in the world
(really---you need not contradict that statement) but ----when Bush
et al-----used the term WMD -----I did not think NUCLEAR BOMB----
in fact---sadaam had been engaging in MASS DESTRUCTION for
years prior to Bush's use of the term--

Yes---the pressure cooker bomb was a weapon of mass destruction

the islamo nazi adolf abu ali----was--HIMSELF a weapon of
mass destruction------in 1915---the turkish army was
a weapon or mass destruction against the armenians---
the minions of Genghis Khan constituted a WEAPON OF
MASS DESTRUCTION


Excuse me Rose but what did you think they were thinking about when they were talking about yello cake uranium. Now back to the OP and Israels WMDs
 
If a mere bomb is a WMD then we really do not need such a term because pretty much every weapon then fits the term.

WMD is another one of those terms that has lost any real meaning.

It lost its meaning when the government decided to use the term as a scare tactic rather than as a truly descriptive term.


We live in a land of lies, folks, so word meanings are one of the victims of our propaganda-confused society.
 
If a mere bomb is a WMD then we really do not need such a term because pretty much every weapon then fits the term.

WMD is another one of those terms that has lost any real meaning.

It lost its meaning when the government decided to use the term as a scare tactic rather than as a truly descriptive term.


We live in a land of lies, folks, so word meanings are one of the victims of our propaganda-confused society.



the term "confused society" is very apt-----yes----lots of people were so stupid
that they believed that WMD was a synonym for ATOM BOMB. Lots of people
are very dim------what else is new? Did you ever see the night time TV program
-----the JAY LENO SHOW and his "jay walks" He demonstrated just how dim
lots of people are
 
If a mere bomb is a WMD then we really do not need such a term because pretty much every weapon then fits the term.

WMD is another one of those terms that has lost any real meaning.

It lost its meaning when the government decided to use the term as a scare tactic rather than as a truly descriptive term.


We live in a land of lies, folks, so word meanings are one of the victims of our propaganda-confused society.


Just thought of this. Maybe the difference lies not so much in the size of the weapon but rather more in who is using it. In one case it is our supposed ally Israel and in the other, according to Roudy it is Muslim Arab Palestinian Terrorists. Just saying.....
 
try again, caturday----the issue is MASS MURDER as in the hundreds of millions of dead
bodies upon which isa-respecters dance
 
Last edited:
If a mere bomb is a WMD then we really do not need such a term because pretty much every weapon then fits the term.

WMD is another one of those terms that has lost any real meaning.

It lost its meaning when the government decided to use the term as a scare tactic rather than as a truly descriptive term.


We live in a land of lies, folks, so word meanings are one of the victims of our propaganda-confused society.


Just thought of this. Maybe the difference lies not so much in the size of the weapon but rather more in who is using it. In one case it is our supposed ally Israel and in the other, according to Roudy it is Muslim Arab Palestinian Terrorists. Just saying.....

Yes, I think you've got it. WMD, much like the term "terrorist" is a term now foisted only on the enemy

When we dropped millions of tons of bombs on cities during WWII and Viet Nam were those NOT WMDs?

I believe that the term ought to be used to describe weapons which TRULY have the ability to kill many people.

So chemical weapons are probably not usually WMDs, because they have proven time after time, not to be very effective.

Nuclear and biological weapons however, do have that potential.
 
Let's retain the term WMD for the biggies; nukes, biological and chemical means that have the potential to kill thousands or more at one stroke.
 
Jihadis Using 'Dark Web' in Pursuit of WMDs...
eek.gif

UN: Terrorists Using 'Dark Web' in Pursuit of WMDs
June 28, 2017 — The U.N.'s disarmament chief warned Wednesday that terrorists and non-state actors are using the so-called dark web to seek the tools to make and deliver weapons of mass destruction.
"The global reach and anonymity of the dark web provides non-state actors with new marketplaces to acquire dual-use equipment and materials," U.N. High Representative for Disarmament Affairs Izumi Nakamitsu told a meeting of the U.N. Security Council. The dark web is a part of the internet that requires special software to access and allows users and website operators to remain anonymous or untraceable, making it appealing to criminals, terrorists and pedophiles. Nakamitsu said that dual-use items are complicating their efforts to address the risks posed by WMD. "We must keep in mind that many of the technologies, goods and raw materials required for developing weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery derive from legitimate commercial applications that benefit many people," she said. Nakamitsu added that it is important to strike the right balance between collective security and commercial opportunity with preventing proliferation.

13508C78-186A-4236-8F3F-E49064BD922C_w650_r0_s.jpg

A still image taken from a video posted to a social media website on April 4, 2017, shows people lying on the ground, said to be in the town of Khan Sheikhoun, after what rescue workers described as a suspected gas attack in rebel-held Idlib, Syria.​

Weapons of mass destruction include nuclear, chemical, radiological and biological weapons. "While there are still significant technical hurdles that terrorist groups need to overcome to effectively use weapons of mass destruction, a growing number of emerging technologies could make this barrier easier to cross," Nakamitsu said. In addition to the dark web, she said the use of drones and 3-D printers by non-state actors are also growing concerns. Nakamitsu urged intensified international cooperation to make it harder for terrorists and criminals to illegally traffic sensitive materials.

Chemical weapons

Terrorists have already used poison gas in at least one deadly attack. In Syria, Islamic State used mustard gas on civilians in the town of Marea in August 2015, according to a U.N.-authorized investigation last year. (The same investigators also concluded that the Syrian government carried out at least two chemical weapons attacks on civilians living in rebel-controlled areas in 2014 and 2015.) "The use by non-state actors of chemical weapons is no longer a threat, but a chilling reality," Joseph Ballard, a senior official with the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) told council members.

Ballard said the OPCW is working to enhance the security of the global supply chain of dual-use materials and technologies, including working with international customs officials. He said the organization also works closely with the international chemical industry, to ensure that toxic chemicals do not fall into the wrong hands.

UN: Terrorists Using 'Dark Web' in Pursuit of WMDs

See also:

Growing Nuclear Arsenals Increase Concerns About Possible Pakistan-India War
June 26, 2017 - India and Pakistan have fought three wars and have been on the brink of another several times, a worrying prospect given that both have growing stockpiles of nuclear weapons and questions about how secure they are.
The arms race between the South Asian neighbors has moved to enhancing the delivery systems for the warheads, which could annihilate the subcontinent several times. India's recent launch of more than 100 satellites with a single rocket foreshadows the capability of sending up a missile with multiple nuclear weapons. The volatility of the situation is further exacerbated because neither country has a national missile defense system, and it likely would take several years to get one in place.

F92E827B-590E-467F-A9F5-C73F09FACAAE_w650_r0_s.jpg

Supersonic BrahMos missiles are prepared for an exhibition in New Delhi, India​

While the policy of mutually assured destruction has kept hostilities from overheating so far, experts believe that a misunderstanding or misadventure could escalate to a full-fledged war with nuclear weapons in play. And there are plenty of risks.

Kashmir a flashpoint

Kashmir has been a flashpoint since the subcontinent was partitioned in 1947 and caused the most recent flare-up last November. Both sides accuse each other of harboring terrorists who launch cross-border attacks. Therefore, the question is whether the nukes in South Asia could fall into the wrong hands during mobilization in the fog of war.

E37E4AC6-2FB3-4BEE-B217-E71617299777_w650_r0_s.jpg

Indian Air Force MIG 21 jet fighters perform during a parade at an airbase in Tezpur, India​

Nuclear arms experts Hans Kristensen and Robert Norris estimate that Pakistan has 120-130 nuclear warheads compared with India's 110-120. India is said to have a stockpile of 540 kilograms of weapons grade plutonium, enough to produce 130 warheads. Pakistan has 3,100 kilograms of highly enriched uranium, sufficient to build 300 warheads. That's a lot to keep an eye on. “The nukes were safe when these were in storage areas in both countries,” Michael Krepon, co-founder and senior associate at Stimson Center, said in an interview with VOA's Urdu Service. “But when these have to be moved around in a state of war, it surely raises a red flag about their security on many counts.

Serious concerns
 
WORDS ARE TRICKY THINGS ???


I have been watching CNN, something I usually do when I can't sleep around 5 in the morning, the last couple of days and I have been hearing something that baffles me. They describe the bombs that were used in Boston as Weapons of Mass Destruction. Now correct me if I am wrong but weren't those words in the past used to describe Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical weapons. If we are going to dumb the words down in one case then shouldn't we also call the cluster munitions, WP rounds, and 1000lb bombs that Israel uses the same thing, WMDs.


You are right caturday-----words are very important That is why
the blarney stone is holy. Weapons of mass destruction are weapons
that kill lots of people I am not the most brilliant person in the world
(really---you need not contradict that statement) but ----when Bush
et al-----used the term WMD -----I did not think NUCLEAR BOMB----
in fact---sadaam had been engaging in MASS DESTRUCTION for
years prior to Bush's use of the term--

Yes---the pressure cooker bomb was a weapon of mass destruction

the islamo nazi adolf abu ali----was--HIMSELF a weapon of
mass destruction------in 1915---the turkish army was
a weapon or mass destruction against the armenians---
the minions of Genghis Khan constituted a WEAPON OF
MASS DESTRUCTION
Your comment is so Insane....Firstly Saddam had NO WMD...that was American BULLSHIT...Although the Americans used WMD in the first and second Gulf War.
????How could The Mongols be a weapon of Mass Destruction????Considering they offered everyone the came into contact with them the opportunity to join them,if they said No,then they were attacked,the only Peoples the deliberately tried to wipe out were the Assassins.who tried to Murder the Great Khan.(where today we get the word Assassination)your ridiculous claim is Retarded to say the least

The US and Israel,North Korea,China,Pakistan and India have WMD...the Americans murdered Iraqi 250,000 souls in one afternoon during the First Gulf War using WMD.

Your whole premise of your post borders the INSANE,everything you quoted is MAD and a LIE.

So I'll throw your post into the Garbage Can of History where it belongs....You need to see your Doctor QUICK SMART,spewing such Rubbish...Mad people and perpeptual liars should not be allowed on here
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom