Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How interviews are done by the media they could learn a lesson from this video. A civil interview during troubling times in the 1960s.
yeh, that is highly annoying... dumbasses who say they are not voting, which means that one or the other of the pres candidates will win and God knows if it will be even the lesser of 2 evils...The apathy of citizens. People who complain about the state of politics and the country but don't take the time to be involved in, voting, jury duty, or political party involvement. This leaves the fringe and hucksters, delusional to hold sway in policy.
He was my Senator back in those days. I was young and didn’t follow politics much. But I felt like both he and his assassinated brother spoke the way our elected officials should speak.
I don’t see Bobby Jr. in the same light, now, as I see his President Kennedy and Sen. Kennedy, looking back. But I agree that both Parties and all candidates and our media would be better served (and would better serve us) if they thought and spoke more like the Kennedys did back then: Educated, reflective, fairly clear and maybe even a bit more candid. And it would help if the news media would stop playing the role of Party loyalist apparatchiks, too.
I don’t buy the Warren Commission report. It looks to me as though the government cobbled that thing together to avoid a public outcry that could have led to war. I don’t doubt that the President was shot from behind and from a higher elevation. I see no reason to doubt (or seriously doubt, anyway) that Oswald was involved. Butso what's your theory on why and how and by whom the Kennedy brothers were assassinated?
I read a book once... can't recall title but it went into the details on the Robert Kennedy assassinationAs to Sen. Robert Kennedy, I have no doubt at all that it was Sirhan Sirhan.
Nomadic5
I disagree. one of RFK’s bodyguard literally wrestled the gun from Sirhan Sirhan’s hand even being vocally encouraged to break his (Sirhan’s) thumb (which I don’t believe he did). That bodyguard was none other than Roosevelt Grier, a then recently retired NFL player.I read a book once... can't recall title but it went into the details on the Robert Kennedy assassination
it was not Sirhan Sirhan... couldn't have been
well, it's one book versus another... which is just another example of how we need to be careful what we readI disagree. one of RFK’s bodyguard literally wrestled the gun from Sirhan Sirhan’s hand even being vocally encouraged to break his (Sirhan’s) thumb (which I don’t believe he did). That bodyguard was none other than Roosevelt Grier, a then recently retired NFL player.
I recall the day vividly. And I saw the audiotapes beginning with eight around that moment. No doubt at all that it was Sirhan Sirhan.
His own attorney asked him at his trial if he had killed Senator Kennedy and Sirhan said, “yes, sir.”
I mean, not all conspiracy theories deserve ridicule. But not all conspiracy theories deserve any credence, either. This case would be hard not to classify as “open and shut.”
Or, it’s far more probable that he confessed to the crime he did commit and for which he had carefully planned for a couple of months.well, it's one book versus another... which is just another example of how we need to be careful what we read
garbage in, garbage out...
SS did have a gun that day and was probably wrestled to the floor... but that doesn't mean it was his gun that did it
I never heard of a confession but hey... if someone wants to take the blame when hedidn't do it... what can we say?