WH Says Musk Not In Charge of DOGE
- Thread starter Lesh
- Start date
Gee whiz....... can you source where DOGE accessed nuclear weapons information?
buttercup
Diamond Member
- Apr 9, 2010
- 12,227
- 9,335
- 2,220
I don't think anyone in Trump's administration is. Or any Democrats, that's for damn sure. That may sound pessimistic, but if I still put trust in politics we wouldn't be having this conversation right now. I think it's a lot like pro wrestling. And thankfully more and more people are realizing that.
Rawley
Diamond Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 45,522
- 30,997
- 3,645
You might want to share that with your protestors and your media.
Based on what they are spending money on, they don't know either.
Zincwarrior
Diamond Member
And his kid picked his nose at Trump.
We all know Hillary's spewing "according to ability and each according to need" from Karl Marx. In all ways there are people who live much better than those words and are Progressives. In the Progressive "Zero Sum Society" that takes a good percentage of wealth away from the peasants. So, Chelsea Clinton is qualified to clean shitters. And yet lives a rich life. Thousands of Americans live poorer due to this. Overseas many people suffer even worse.
OldFlame
Diamond Member
- Aug 5, 2020
- 9,661
- 7,879
- 1,938
You didn't answer my question.
No one trust politics, so not sure why you think you're the only one who doesn't.
And what's the point of discussing any of it if there's no one capable of trusting? You can pick no 'side' and sling arrows at everyone, it will accomplish nothing.
And that's why we're here..... thanks for pointing it out.
Last edited:
- Dec 16, 2017
- 17,753
- 8,838
- 475
I don't know why you all are upset about this. In 4 years, if you take over the white house, your guy will just undo all of this anyway. All those employees who were fired will be given the opportunity to come back with no lost time and complete back pay.
This is only temporary.
This is only temporary.
Not so sure......... we've only seen the tip of the iceberg.
May not be a party with a viable option to take it back.
buttercup
Diamond Member
- Apr 9, 2010
- 12,227
- 9,335
- 2,220
Gosh, where to begin. There's just so much that could be brought up here, it would end up being an essay if I listed all the reasons.
So I'm going to keep this short. If you look at the globalists' / WEF stated goals, Trump and Musk promote a number of them. They are for AI and technocracy, and as I said earlier, Trump's 500 billion dollar Stargate project is moving us toward an AI / technocratic system. They promote mRNA vaccines, Trump promotes mRNA vaccines and to this day still acts as if the Covid vaccine is a wonderful thing. They support transhumanism, Trump has surrounded himself with transhumanists, including of course his guy, Musk. They promote "Smart Cities".... Trump has promoted "Freedom Cities" which is just rebranded language for basically the same idea. They promote autonomous transportation, Musk openly promotes that idea, and although Trump may not be as vocal about that, I highly doubt he's going to oppose it. They support digital currency, Trump is taking us in the direction of digital currency.
There are about a thousand other things I could bring up as far as why I believe Trump is controlled opposition, but there's too much to bring up at the moment.
Huh? If you were saying that they are part of the problem, then yes, agreed. If you were saying something else, then please clarify it.
Start a thread
buttercup
Diamond Member
- Apr 9, 2010
- 12,227
- 9,335
- 2,220
Maybe, but I can't do it right now. I have something IRL I have to do in a few minutes, and then after that it's supper time. But maybe sometime in the near future I will. Thanks for being civil.
That's the way I usually roll. It's others who get their just desserts when they choose to be ignorant fools.
Rawley
Diamond Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 45,522
- 30,997
- 3,645
Doesn't feel like it. This seems like a permanent change in how Washington is run.
dudmuck
Diamond Member
DOGE has access to Department of Energy IT systems, so its reasonable to inquire about it.
TemplarKormac
Political Atheist
In the Executive Order:
"(b) Establishment of a Temporary Organization. There shall be a USDS Administrator established in the Executive Office of the President who shall report to the White House Chief of Staff. There is further established within USDS, in accordance with section 3161 of title 5, United States Code, a temporary organization known as "the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization". The U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization shall be headed by the USDS Administrator and shall be dedicated to advancing the President's 18-month DOGE agenda."
There is currently no USDS administrator.
"(b) Establishment of a Temporary Organization. There shall be a USDS Administrator established in the Executive Office of the President who shall report to the White House Chief of Staff. There is further established within USDS, in accordance with section 3161 of title 5, United States Code, a temporary organization known as "the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization". The U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization shall be headed by the USDS Administrator and shall be dedicated to advancing the President's 18-month DOGE agenda."
There is currently no USDS administrator.
Yeah.......... financial expenditures are what is being examined.
To access what you imply takes classification levels way beyond what you try to imply.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Trump touts $9 trillion in new U.S. investment. The numbers don't add up.- Started by IM2
- Replies: 0
-
Almost half of Gazans willing to leave, survey finds
- Started by toomuchtime_
- Replies: 1
-
-
