Wendy's Supports Chick-Fil-A

[PoliticalChic]

It should be noted that a) you're not answering his direct question and b) you look nothing like your avatar and are probably very gross both inside and out.

Do you understand the difference between critiquing a concept, versus attacking the person who employs the concept?

No?

How liberal of you.



When one is unable to refute a post, the less able often resort to ad hominem attack.

You have identified yourself as today's DH.....'designated half-wit.'

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

A good deal more intelligent than most of your posts.

 

[ConservaDerrps]

Do you understand the difference between critiquing a concept, versus attacking the person who employs the concept?

No?

How liberal of you.



When one is unable to refute a post, the less able often resort to ad hominem attack.

You have identified yourself as today's DH.....'designated half-wit.'

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

A good deal more intelligent than most of your posts.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

[philsphan04]

According to a Rasmussen poll, 61% of Americans have a favorable view of Chick-fil-A. Only 13% said they will participate in a boycott.

 

[PoliticalChic]

According to a Rasmussen poll, 61% of Americans have a favorable view of Chick-fil-A. Only 13% said they will participate in a boycott.

Interesting, phils....

...and we'll see a similar result in November.

 

[philsphan04]

Interesting, phils....

...and we'll see a similar result in November.

You may be on to something.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Interesting, phils....

...and we'll see a similar result in November.

You may be on to something.

BTW...welcome to the board.

 

[philsphan04]

Thanks! I identify as a political moderate, but who am I kidding? I vote Republican because I see their policies as the lesser of two evils haha.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Thanks! I identify as a political moderate, but who am I kidding? I vote Republican because I see their policies as the lesser of two evils haha.

Every election is such a choice.

 

[koshergrl]

Do you understand the difference between critiquing a concept, versus attacking the person who employs the concept?

No?

How liberal of you.



When one is unable to refute a post, the less able often resort to ad hominem attack.

You have identified yourself as today's DH.....'designated half-wit.'

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

A good deal more intelligent than most of your posts.

I have both turds and that freak conz on ignore.

My life is much less unpleasant now that I'm not subjected to their crazed and painfully stupid rantings.

 

[ima]

"You're against gay marriage, right? So you must care what people you don't know get up to, otherwise you wouldn't care."

Logic, it seems, escapes you.


It should be noted that you were unable to produce any indication, statements, or data that I am "so obsessed with what people you don't know (gays) get up to?"


As you enjoy debating with yourself, and pretending my sentiments rather than employing same, you really have no argument.

Simple question then: are you against gay marriage?

It should be noted that you were unable to produce any indication, statements, or data that I am "so obsessed with what people you don't know (gays) get up to?"

I am about to if you just answer my simple question. Or are you too embarrassed to admit that you're against gay marriage?

 

[ConservaDerrps]

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

A good deal more intelligent than most of your posts.

I have both turds and that freak conz on ignore.

My life is much less unpleasant now that I'm not subjected to their crazed and painfully stupid rantings.

So you won't see it now when I call you a massive turd in the toilet bowl of human existence?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Simple question then: are you against gay marriage?

It should be noted that you were unable to produce any indication, statements, or data that I am "so obsessed with what people you don't know (gays) get up to?"

I am about to if you just answer my simple question. Or are you too embarrassed to admit that you're against gay marriage?

It should be noted that you were unable to produce any indication, statements, or data that I am "so obsessed with what people you don't know (gays) get up to?"

As this was your charge, an apology for same behooves you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

A good deal more intelligent than most of your posts.

I have both turds and that freak conz on ignore.

My life is much less unpleasant now that I'm not subjected to their crazed and painfully stupid rantings.

I understand what you mean...but it's the provenance of that "crazed and painfully stupid" attitude....

...many are subjected to government schools and similar media, but some lack the strength to think through it.

Such is the dolt to whom you refer.

Any who don't agree with the Leftist orthodoxy are, rightly, eligible for vulgarity and contumely.



Dennis Prager nailed it:


1. Leftism is so pervasive, that if applied to any other way of looking at life, it would be widely recognized as a form of brainwashing! Image a person who attended only fundamental Christian schools from preschool through graduate school, who never saw a secular, let alone anti-Christian, film, and who only read religious books. Most would say that they had been ‘brainwashed.” Yet, we regularly find individuals who only attended secular liberal schools from preschool through college, watched or listened to only Left-of-center television, movies, music, and had essentially no exposure to religious or conservative ideas. Brainwashed?

Of course not! Liberals are open-minded!!! The irony here is that the denial itself shows how very effective the brainwashing has been.

Now, Christians or Jews who have rarely been exposed to secular ideas and values would readily acknowledge same. It is only those on the Left who fool themselves into believing that they have been exposed to all points of view.


2. Universities have become to Liberalism what a Christian seminary is to Christianity. The difference is that Christian seminaries acknowledge their purpose, to produce committed Christians.

a. “The purpose of a university should be to make a son as unlike his father as possible.” The University's Part in Political Life” (13 March 1909) in PWW (The Papers of Woodrow Wilson) 19:99.
b. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_ANRgcvjkk&feature=fvwrel]USA Eric Holder D.O.J "We Must Brainwash People About Guns" - YouTube[/ame]



They are weak, in character and in intellect.

 

[ConservaDerrps]

A good deal more intelligent than most of your posts.

I have both turds and that freak conz on ignore.

My life is much less unpleasant now that I'm not subjected to their crazed and painfully stupid rantings.

I understand what you mean...but it's the provenance of that "crazed and painfully stupid" attitude....

...many are subjected to government schools and similar media, but some lack the strength to think through it.

Such is the dolt to whom you refer.

Any who don't agree with the Leftist orthodoxy are, rightly, eligible for vulgarity and contumely.



Dennis Prager nailed it:


1. Leftism is so pervasive, that if applied to any other way of looking at life, it would be widely recognized as a form of brainwashing! Image a person who attended only fundamental Christian schools from preschool through graduate school, who never saw a secular, let alone anti-Christian, film, and who only read religious books. Most would say that they had been ‘brainwashed.” Yet, we regularly find individuals who only attended secular liberal schools from preschool through college, watched or listened to only Left-of-center television, movies, music, and had essentially no exposure to religious or conservative ideas. Brainwashed?

Of course not! Liberals are open-minded!!! The irony here is that the denial itself shows how very effective the brainwashing has been.

Now, Christians or Jews who have rarely been exposed to secular ideas and values would readily acknowledge same. It is only those on the Left who fool themselves into believing that they have been exposed to all points of view.


2. Universities have become to Liberalism what a Christian seminary is to Christianity. The difference is that Christian seminaries acknowledge their purpose, to produce committed Christians.

a. “The purpose of a university should be to make a son as unlike his father as possible.” The University's Part in Political Life” (13 March 1909) in PWW (The Papers of Woodrow Wilson) 19:99.
b. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_ANRgcvjkk&feature=fvwrel]USA Eric Holder D.O.J "We Must Brainwash People About Guns" - YouTube[/ame]



They are weak, in character and in intellect.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

[koshergrl]

Good grief, they can't wait two seconds before proving you absolutely 100 percent correct.

 

[ConservaDerrps]

Good grief, they can't wait two seconds before proving you absolutely 100 percent correct.

So I'm not on ignore then, you massive lying, sycophantic piece of dog shit?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Good grief, they can't wait two seconds before proving you absolutely 100 percent correct.

Our poor, sad friend doesn't realize his weakness, and the need to be embraced by the mob.

People like that fear being ostracized....

 

[ConservaDerrps]

Good grief, they can't wait two seconds before proving you absolutely 100 percent correct.

Our poor, sad friend doesn't realize his weakness, and the need to be embraced by the mob.

People like that fear being ostracized....

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

[ima]

Simple question then: are you against gay marriage?

It should be noted that you were unable to produce any indication, statements, or data that I am "so obsessed with what people you don't know (gays) get up to?"

I am about to if you just answer my simple question. Or are you too embarrassed to admit that you're against gay marriage?

Still waiting...

 

[PoliticalChic]

It should be noted that you were unable to produce any indication, statements, or data that I am "so obsessed with what people you don't know (gays) get up to?"

I am about to if you just answer my simple question. Or are you too embarrassed to admit that you're against gay marriage?

Still waiting...

It should be noted that you were unable to produce any indication, statements, or data that I am "so obsessed with what people you don't know (gays) get up to?"

As this was your charge, an apology for same behooves you.


Weren't ever told to apologize when you make a mistake?