You didn't post any evidence...Whatever.
Denying the facts is all you got.
Your article is a posting of chronological event...
Facts. yes... But it proves nothing...
Where in that article does it have verifiable evidence...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You didn't post any evidence...Whatever.
Denying the facts is all you got.
What do you believe?You didn't post any evidence...
Your article is a posting of chronological event...
Facts. yes... But it proves nothing...
Where in that article does it have verifiable evidence...
Neither...What do you believe?
Shokin was fired because:
1). He was investigating Burisma.
2). He wasn't investigating Burisma.
You have it backwards.Well as intended judging from the post, the Trump indictment certainly got Joe Biden's bribery off the front page.
What side do you think I'm on?Neither...
He was fired for being corrupt and incompentent... simple as that...
There was a line of international bodies that wanted him removed if Ukraine...
IMF, EU,.... The GOP led Senate wanted him removed as well...
So nice try..
But you believe Biden, you stupid gullible leftard.Shokin is corrupt
He wasn’t prosecuting criminals
The story about Burisma was made up by Rudy and Trump and reported by JS
So yes, you believe trump and Rudy.
We don’t
I believe the entire EU.But you believe Biden, you stupid gullible leftard.
What a bunch of DUMB stupid fucktards libbies are these days.
I believe the entire EU.
You believe the fabricated story made up my Rudy, trump, and reported by JS.
Whose gullible? That would be you.
Make sure you send that fundraising check to someone who claims to be "Very Rich." Suckers...
What side do you think I'm on?
WTF....... Nice Try?
Sorry Winco, Replied to wrong post..What side do you think I'm on?
WTF....... Nice Try?
Lovely story...According to the document, the Burisma executive in question sought “advice on the best way to go forward” in 2015 and 2016, specifically with regards to gaining access to U.S. oil rights and working with an American oil company. When the informant asked why the executive needed their advice when Hunter Biden, the son of the sitting Vice President, was already on the board, the executive simply described Hunter as “dumb.”
The executive then admitted that Burisma had to “pay the Bidens” due to the then-ongoing investigation into Burisma by Ukraine’s Prosecutor-General Viktor Shokin. When the informant suggested that the executive should pay the Bidens “$50,000 each,” the executive replied “not $50,000…$5 million for one Biden, $5 million for the other Biden.”
Evidence....According to the document, the Burisma executive in question sought “advice on the best way to go forward” in 2015 and 2016, specifically with regards to gaining access to U.S. oil rights and working with an American oil company. When the informant asked why the executive needed their advice when Hunter Biden, the son of the sitting Vice President, was already on the board, the executive simply described Hunter as “dumb.”
The executive then admitted that Burisma had to “pay the Bidens” due to the then-ongoing investigation into Burisma by Ukraine’s Prosecutor-General Viktor Shokin. When the informant suggested that the executive should pay the Bidens “$50,000 each,” the executive replied “not $50,000…$5 million for one Biden, $5 million for the other Biden.”