Which is a fancy way of saying they believe there is no natural climate variability which is not supported by empirical climate evidence from the geologic record.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which is a fancy way of saying they believe there is no natural climate variability which is not supported by empirical climate evidence from the geologic record.
No. It means that you lack the science background to follow IPCC commentary aimed at policy makers.Which is a fancy way of saying they believe there is no natural climate variability which is not supported by empirical climate evidence from the geologic record.
You can attempt to evade, escape and deny all you want but you do deny all natural climate variability and assume all warming is from CO2. That's why you demand to know what has changed.No. It means that you lack the science background to follow IPCC commentary aimed at policy makers.
And misleading. As glaciers retreated 14,000 years ago the Arabian Peninsula became more arid... changing from a well watered savanna to desert. So while Robert W is correct that there's no cause for panic, it's also rather stupid and pointless unless the objective is to raise a strawman.Yes, he's not a fake climate scientist, that's why the video is factual.
Glacial cycles aren't misleading. They have been the reality of the planet for the last 3 million years.And misleading. As glaciers retreated 14,000 years ago the Arabian Peninsula became more arid... changing from a well watered savanna to desert. So while Robert W is correct that there's no cause for panic, it's also rather stupid and pointless unless the objective is to raise a strawman.
Exactly.Glacial cycles aren't misleading. They have been the reality of the planet for the last 3 million years.
What happens when it ends?