We need an independent commission to look at what happened in Afghanistan
1. We don't need any more 'independent councils', 'investigative committees', or 'inquiries' ... and everyone one this board knows why.
They are complete political wastes of time. Politicians use them to cover their own asses or to go after political opponents. Even the worst of circumstances can not cause politicians to come together bipartisanly. And when the dumbest, most inept, criminal facts come out one group does everything they can to protect their political brethren from consequences.
Case In Point: During the Benghazi hearing it was revealed that to protect the Ambassador and Americans there a Security company was hired....a team that had NEVER WORKED A JOB WHERE THEY WERE REQUIRED TO CARRY WEAPONS and had never been in a hostile, wartime area.
- WHO THE HELL WOULD HIRE WAL MART GUARDS TO PRPOTECT AN AMBASSADOR AND AMERICANS IN AL QAEDA-CONTROLLED LIBYA?
NO ONE was punished for this (as in FIRED))
There are definitely people who need to be fired over the 'Saigon 2.0' Afghan Exit F*-Up..., but an panel / committee / council will not get it done because it will be so political.
2. Need to be more specific than 'what happened in Afghanistan'.
It would be assumed that you are talking about the 'Saigon 2.0' Afghan Exit F*-Up, but one should not assume (as the saying goes) & there is a lot that has gone wrong in Afghanistan.
- If we are talking about the the 'Saigon 2.0' Afghan Exit F*-Up, are we talking about the political decisions resulting in the F*-Up, are we talking about why several Taliban members in the photo in the Presidential palace are carrying shiny new US weapons, one of many left behind as 'house-warming' presents?
Got to clarify.