The United States Constitution is, indeed, a "living, breathing document" - subject to evolved interpretation as the nature and needs of the Republic change.
And, of course, the Supreme Court is the Ultimate Authority for its interpretation.
If, in the future, the Court overturns Roe v Wade or other LibProg Sacred Cows, then, that too, is an evolving interpretation based upon the nature and needs of the Republic.
The Founding Fathers did not intend the Constitution to be a Perpetual Straight-Jacket.
We are now embarking upon an era in which the Court will serve up decisions more in line with Conservative rather than Liberal values.
Checks and balances, on an ongoing basis.
LibProgs go too far, then Conservatives checkmate them for a while.
Eventually, we'll rinse-and-repeat the entire cycle, over a generation or two or three.
If I know your SSN, can I shout it out on main street to anyone who will listen? Or what if you have AIDS...can I tell people that you have this disease?
Can we tell we people that you have scheduled with your doctor to have your head extracted from your ass ?
No but we can tell you're a douchebag.
My interpretation of activist, a person who can not read.
My interpretation of the constitution... who gives a fuck? Read what it says, it's not meant to be interpreted.
The words of the United States Constitution are not to be reworked or legislatively overturned by activists liberals judges who feel the Constitution is a living document. Strict constructionist view is the correct one.
Loose Construction versus Strict Construction | Conservatism In The United States | United States Government
Our Founders were very wise. They provided for a way of making changes to the Constitution if it is done through the mechanism provided.
One only has to look at other countries with :"living constitutions" and the abuses that arise there. Turkey is a prime example.
Let me tell ALL of you why the Leftists are having such a cow---------->
the Leftists (except for Obamacare, and almost all of those legislators got thrown out) have NEVER......except for what is in parenthesis, LEGISLATED big moves towards their nonsense, they USED THE COURTS.
Consider...……...how many states voted AGAINST gay marriage; and when I say states, I mean the CITIZENS of those states? What did the Leftists do? They ran to court, and YES......even CALIFORNIA voted against it!
You see, Leftists know they can NOT get their agenda passed by MAKING LAWS, because they can't get elected. The legislature doesn't work for them. So what do they do with a President like Obysmal? Well, remember what HE SAID when asked about just stamping the immigration law, "I can't do it! We have a CONSTITUTION!" But, he just signed EOs and did it anyway, didn't he!
That is why the Left needs the courts so badly. We can LEGISLATE, they need to DICTATE! And once the dictate, they need the courts to say it is all ok for them to do it.
Just look at how they abuse---------> AZ tries to enforce immigration law. They get court to say immigration is up to the feds. Trump tries it, they judge shop and say, no-no-no.
THEY NEED THE COURTS! Why do you think they are slow walking all of Trumps nominees? Last I seen, at the rate they are going, it would take 12 years!
The REAL polls (not the national generic poll) are looking very good for us, and it is incumbent on YOU to vote in the midterms. I am no fan of RINO's, but if the choice is between a RINO, and someone who will back the far Left Socialists, we have no choice. It is OUR job to force the RINO's out in the Republican primary, NOT the general election!
So, in closing...…...remember, the MORE originalist the Supreme Court is, the larger dagger to the heart of the Leftist/Socialists. No, not because they are going to over turn Roe V Wade, but rather because without the court, they have to pass laws, and to do that, they have to get elected. And if they are elected and pass a SOCIALIST law, they will quickly get UNELECTED next time, lol...…..and they KNOW IT!
