We can all agree. Trumps EO Muslim ban #1 was a disaster .

[12icer]

The second anti-Muslim executive order will also be struck-down by the judiciary.

NOT EVEN , if the same circuit court that has been overturned 80% of the time does the same thing this time and proves they are overstepping their constitutional duties and usurping those of other branches look for that court to be closed and another with conservative constitutionalist circuit to be opened. It is within the power of the congress to assign, open, close and redistrict any federal court in the federal system, AND GUESS WHO CAN REQUEST IT!!!!!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why do lefties celebrate when jihadists win a freaking court case? Reality is upside down in the liberal mind.

What jihadists ?

why do righties respond wh rediculous hyperbole?

Learn to spell.

 

[Timmy]

The second anti-Muslim executive order will also be struck-down by the judiciary.

Why aren't the trump bots complaining how it doesn't go far enough ? Can their messiah do no wrong ?

 

[Eloy]

The second anti-Muslim executive order will also be struck-down by the judiciary.

NOT EVEN , if the same circuit court that has been overturned 80% of the time does the same thing this time and proves they are overstepping their constitutional duties and usurping those of other branches look for the 9th to be closed and another with conservative constitutionalist circuit to be opened. It is within the power of the congress to assign, open, close and redistrict any federal court in the federal system, AND GUESS WHO CAN REQUEST IT!!!!!

There are three federal judges challenging the second attempt to ban Muslims: Washington (the original judge who got #1 struck down), New York, and Hawai'i. It is getting better. I predicted that since the Republicans control Congress, the Judiciary will have to check the president.

 

[Timmy]

Why do lefties celebrate when jihadists win a freaking court case? Reality is upside down in the liberal mind.

What jihadists ?

why do righties respond wh rediculous hyperbole?

Learn to spell.

Ohhhh the spelling police ! Aka , the douchebags of the internet!

 

[Timmy]

The second anti-Muslim executive order will also be struck-down by the judiciary.

NOT EVEN , if the same circuit court that has been overturned 80% of the time does the same thing this time and proves they are overstepping their constitutional duties and usurping those of other branches look for that court to be closed and another with conservative constitutionalist circuit to be opened. It is within the power of the congress to assign, open, close and redistrict any federal court in the federal system, AND GUESS WHO CAN REQUEST IT!!!!!

Then why didn't Trump appeal ? He just tucked his tail and went back to his racist drawing board.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why do lefties celebrate when jihadists win a freaking court case? Reality is upside down in the liberal mind.

What jihadists ?

why do righties respond wh rediculous hyperbole?

Learn to spell.

Ohhhh the spelling police ! Aka , the douchebags of the internet!

Ohhhh, the mentally challenged! AKA the liberals!

 

[Timmy]

Why do lefties celebrate when jihadists win a freaking court case? Reality is upside down in the liberal mind.

What jihadists ?

why do righties respond wh rediculous hyperbole?

Learn to spell.

Ohhhh the spelling police ! Aka , the douchebags of the internet!

Ohhhh, the mentally challenged! AKA the liberals!

You are deflecting from the topic because you have no retort .

 

[Avatar4321]

The second anti-Muslim executive order will also be struck-down by the judiciary.

Why aren't the trump bots complaining how it doesn't go far enough ? Can their messiah do no wrong ?

Why would anyone complain about it not going far enough? What more do you think it needs?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why do lefties celebrate when jihadists win a freaking court case? Reality is upside down in the liberal mind.

What jihadists ?

why do righties respond wh rediculous hyperbole?

Learn to spell.

Ohhhh the spelling police ! Aka , the douchebags of the internet!

Ohhhh, the mentally challenged! AKA the liberals!

You are deflecting from the topic because you have no retort .

I already gave you the facts. You are just too stupid to recognize it.

BTW, the word you were looking for is "response", not "retort".

 

[Timmy]

You are deflecting from the topic because you have no retort .[/QUOTE]

I already gave you the facts. You are just too stupid to recognize it.

BTW, the word you were looking for is "response", not "retort".[/QUOTE]

Ya see, if you are going to be dickhead grammar police your shit needs to be tight . So you don't look like a total ass hat .

retort
1
[ri-tawrt]
verb (used with object)

1. to reply to, usually in a sharp or retaliatory way; reply in kind to.
   

 

[12icer]

The second anti-Muslim executive order will also be struck-down by the judiciary.

NOT EVEN , if the same circuit court that has been overturned 80% of the time does the same thing this time and proves they are overstepping their constitutional duties and usurping those of other branches look for the 9th to be closed and another with conservative constitutionalist circuit to be opened. It is within the power of the congress to assign, open, close and redistrict any federal court in the federal system, AND GUESS WHO CAN REQUEST IT!!!!!

There are three federal judges challenging the second attempt to ban Muslims: Washington (the original judge who got #1 struck down), New York, and Hawai'i. It is getting better. I predicted that since the Republicans control Congress, the Judiciary will have to check the president.

DID you not understand the FACT that the REPUBLICANS can just close down the court, and disband it if the judges do the same unconstitutional thing again!!! You need to read the Directives in the constitution. Funny how liberal dumbasses always try to use different sections of it to bolster their points when the sections they quote are for completely different parts of the three branches. Like they were counting on the Article one FIRST to use against Trump when it has absolutely NO bearing whatsoever on HIM. The judiciary has NO authority over the Executive branch, and if Trump decided to he could wipe the entire judicial except the Supreme court and reseat all new judges.

Checks on the Executive

• Judicial review

Checks on the Judiciary are

• Senate approves federal judges
• Impeachment power (House)
• Trial of impeachments (Senate)
• Power to initiate constitutional amendments
• Power to set courts inferior to the Supreme Court
• Power to set jurisdiction of courts
• Power to alter the size of the Supreme Court

Next we have this in finality>>>
U.S. Constitution - Amendment 11
Amendment 11 - Judicial Limits


The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.


This means that any state filing a suit against the United States Government is FILING a suit against all of the states that are protected by this Amendment that are not named as plaintiffs in the suit. Therefore it is unconstitutional for a state to file without entoto participation.

 

[Eloy]

The second anti-Muslim executive order will also be struck-down by the judiciary.

NOT EVEN , if the same circuit court that has been overturned 80% of the time does the same thing this time and proves they are overstepping their constitutional duties and usurping those of other branches look for the 9th to be closed and another with conservative constitutionalist circuit to be opened. It is within the power of the congress to assign, open, close and redistrict any federal court in the federal system, AND GUESS WHO CAN REQUEST IT!!!!!

There are three federal judges challenging the second attempt to ban Muslims: Washington (the original judge who got #1 struck down), New York, and Hawai'i. It is getting better. I predicted that since the Republicans control Congress, the Judiciary will have to check the president.

DID you not understand the FACT that the REPUBLICANS can just close down the court, and disband it if the judges do the same unconstitutional thing again!!! You need to read the Directives in the constitution. Funny how liberal dumbasses always try to use different sections of it to bolster their points when the sections they quote are for completely different parts of the three branches. Like they were counting on the Article one FIRST to use against Trump when it has absolutely NO bearing whatsoever on HIM. The judiciary has NO authority over the Executive branch, and if Trump decided to he could wipe the entire judicial except the Supreme court and reseat all new judges.

Checks on the Executive

• Judicial review

Checks on the Judiciary are

• Senate approves federal judges
• Impeachment power (House)
• Trial of impeachments (Senate)
• Power to initiate constitutional amendments
• Power to set courts inferior to the Supreme Court
• Power to set jurisdiction of courts
• Power to alter the size of the Supreme Court

Next we have this in finality>>>
U.S. Constitution - Amendment 11
Amendment 11 - Judicial Limits


The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.


This means that any state filing a suit against the United States Government is FILING a suit against all of the states that are protected by this Amendment that are not named as plaintiffs in the suit. Therefore it is unconstitutional for a state to file without entoto participation.

I see nothing in what you have quoted that would support your statement that a federal judge is prohibited from reviewing an executive order if that order is affecting citizens of his or her jurisdiction. See what you wrote above relating to the power of a federal judge:
"Checks on the Executive

• Judicial review"

This means that a federal judge such as the one in Washington has the authority to review an executive order for the purpose of determining its legality. This is what it all comes down to. There is nothing in the Washington federal judge's review and finding an illegality in the first executive order that has a bearing on what you wrote about a state filing a suit against the United States Government. Not even a president who does not like to be challenged is above the law nor can he stop a judicial review.

 

[JBond]

Remember when he came out with that garbage? Everyone said it was rushed and done without talking to the agency heads . Well the critics were all right !

The new EO is watered down big time. And oh, Iraq is magically off the list . Guess the pentagon got thru Trumps thick skull on that one .

Proof it's amateur hour over in the WH.

Yep. Obama never had any missteps. Dead border security officer killed with a weapon the Obama administration smuggled to drug lords. A dead ambassador after failing to respond to a planned attack, even though they had military near by. Yep. Obama was awesome.