SweetSue92
Diamond Member
Those accusations are all based on interpretation of the law. And yes, I can see them being included in the Articles with specifics. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see more actions like that come to light.The personal insults really aren't necessary.I'm waiting to see what the Articles of Impeachment say. That's where this gets beyond shallow assumptions & rhetorical slap fights, and into concrete reality.Everything. The democrats should not be alone in having to prove to the people for the 1000th time about another instance of Trump violating the constitution. The right is once again lying and excusing his behavior. But to you, liberals angrily calling out this tyranny is the same as protecting it.
Maybe the Dems will have a great case. That's what the investigative process is for. I don't know at the moment.
But my opinion won't be swayed by transparent partisans tooting vague platitudes about the violation of the Constitution.
.
I'm not worried about swaying your opinion. Trump has violated the constitution on numerous occasions and has consistently abused his power. That's what the Mueller report showed and every instance of him refusing to answer to congress shows this as well. So your choice to be stupid and adopt right wing doubts is your problem. We have a transcript of the call, we have the documented complaint of the whistle blower. Both stories match. I don't toot vague platitudes, the facts show what I have said to be correct.
Okay, show me. List the verified actions and the corresponding passages in the Constitution. Maybe you're right.
.
You're right. The personal insults are not necessary.
But my opinion won't be swayed by transparent partisans tooting vague platitudes about the violation of the Constitution.
Trump has violated the constitution on numerous occasions. If you are incapable of understanding that he has consistently obstructed justice, abused his power, tampered with witnesses, personally enriched himself off the presidency, and now has attempted extortion, then you just aren't very aware.
What I don't do is see a reason to play judge and jury before the facts are laid out and fully & fairly challenged. Maybe new information will come out. Maybe I'm not seeing something.
Making one-sided assumptions, automatically believing the worst, and being incurious about contrary information are all behaviors regularly shared by both ends of the spectrum.
I'm curious and open to new information. I wish those were not qualities that are become more and more rare.
.
You already made your judgement a couple of days ago when you were leaping around with your hair on fire like the rest of the loony leftist tribe, so who are you trying to fool? You're not fooling anyone