Star
Gold Member
- Apr 5, 2009
- 2,532
- 614
- 190
This Navy vet thought it was a hilarious skewering the Romney/Republican stupidity.
As an Air Force Vet, I second that sentiment.
For the Republicans that are link challenged here's a link to PolitiFact that contains this quote ☛ "This is a great example of a politician using more or less accurate statistics to make a meaningless claim. Judging by the numbers alone, Romney was close to accurate. In recent years, the number of Navy and Air Force assets has sunk to levels not seen in decades, although the number of ships has risen slightly under Obama.
However, a wide range of experts told us itÂ’s wrong to assume that a decline in the number of ships or aircraft automatically means a weaker military. Quite the contrary: The United States is the worldÂ’s unquestioned military leader today, not just because of the number of ships and aircraft in its arsenal but also because each is stocked with top-of-the-line technology and highly trained personnel.
Thanks to the development of everything from nuclear weapons to drones, comparing todayÂ’s military to that of 60 to 100 years ago presents an egregious comparison of apples and oranges. TodayÂ’s military and political leaders face real challenges in determining the right mix of assets to deal with current and future threats, but RomneyÂ’s glib suggestion that todayÂ’s military posture is in any way similar to that of its predecessors in 1917 or 1947 is preposterous.
In addition, Romney appears to be using the statistic as a critique of the current administration, while experts tell us that both draw-downs and buildups of military equipment occur over long periods of time and can't be pegged to one president. Put it all together and you have a statement that, despite being close to accurate in its numbers, uses those numbers in service of a ridiculous point. Pants on Fire." click here ☛ PolitiFact

V
V
V