Watch As Two Plus Two Equals Four

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing. Bet you can't.
By your standards? From your political perspective? Correct, I can't.

Which is my point.
.


Your 'point' is well hidden by that sombrero....

This was the challenge....

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing. Bet you can't.



Of course.....you failed miserably.

Seems to be a pattern, huh?




Let's rub your face in it again, shall we?

Let's go right for the head of the Far Left....Obama

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."



Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?




So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



And, you can't.
I'm sure that's all very interesting.

It's impossible to prove anything to online zealots, so I no longer try.

Believe whatever you'd like. Irrelevant to me.
.



Excellent.


You're dismissed.
 
And, as I stated, there is a Far Left in this nation.....

16 Democrat AGs Begin Inquisition Against ‘Climate Change Disbelievers’
16 Democrat AGs Begin Inquisition Against ‘Climate Change Disbelievers’

…in 1478, the Spanish Inquisition systematically silenced any citizen who held views that did not align with the king’s. Using the powerful arm of the government, the grand inquisitor, Tomas de Torquemada, and his henchmen sought out all those who held religious, scientific, or moral views that conflicted with the monarch’s, punishing the “heretics” with jail sentences; property confiscation; fines; and in severe cases, torture and execution.

… New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said, “The bottom line is simple: Climate change is real.” He went on to say that if companies are committing fraud by “lying” about the dangers of climate change, they will “pursue them to the fullest extent of the law.”





And this:

Gov. Cuomo: Pro-life, pro-gun conservatives 'have no place' in New York
Gov. Cuomo: Pro-life, pro-gun conservatives ‘have no place’ in New York




But no one can find any Far Right pronouncements.

Because there is no Far Right in America.
 

Forum List

Back
Top