The second Iraq war was about several things"
1. bad intel about WMDs
2. revenge for Saddam's attempted hit on Bush 41
3. oil
It was a waste of american lives and money. But to say that Bush did it all on his own is partisan bullshit. Congress, the UN, the EU, UK, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia et al believed the bad intel and supported the war. The US congress authorized and funded it. THEY ALL HAVE BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS.
History needs to record this accurately, hopefully it will.
1. Well the Clinton cult did cut the CIA budget and set policy which made it nearly impossible to hire assets, forbidding assets which had a criminal history, were known hostiles to the subject culture, etc, etc.. .
2. You're thinking of the service of justice and foolishly used the word revenge.
3. ROFLMNAO! That is ADORABLE. The US did not take a gallon of oil from Iraq for which it did not pay a stark premium price. The assertion is absurd on its face.
Post 9-11, Iraq, had a decades long history as a long standing proponent of the use of international Islamic terrorism as a proxy through which to attack US in the targeting and killing of her citizens, repeatedly attacking her interests and allies...
Iraq was also in material breech of its treaty obligations and we know from the extensive, respective reports of Charles Dulfer and David Kay that Iraq was in fact operating programs for the development and production of CBW, with enormous stockpiles of dual use chemicals and components at the ready and, that once the pressures by the US were relieved and had the US not invaded, Iraq was ready to rebuild production on a massive scale.
There was no legitimate choice available to US Leadership, post 9-11 not to invade and conquer Iraq, removing it's socialist government and providing the people of Iraq the OPPORTUNITY for self governance.
"Feelings" to the contrary are absurd and thoroughly irrelevant.