Warning: Gravity is "Only a Theory"

[james bond]

Overall, the Theory of Universal Gravity is just not an attractive theory.

You fall for the liberal simpleton science. We scholars know it's both law and theory.

What's this law? In the language of science, the word "law" describes an analytic statement. It gives us a formula that tells us what things will do such as atheists will usually be wrong.

"Every point mass attracts every single point mass by a force pointing along the line intersecting both points. The force is directly proportional to the product of the two masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the point masses."

 

[abu afak]

Funny I have never mentioned or argued religion anywhere on these forums. Come up with some new material you two bit hack.

Still whiffed my post and it's facts THREE Times.
You are the hack.
Empty POS one too.
You got no game.
You down 50 IQ points BOY.
`

 

[abu afak]

joke? Again........applied science is real science, anything based upon mental projections is nothing but "philosophy"

"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools." -- Romans 1:22

Why can no one explain the origins of the universe as based upon the natural laws of physics? Why can no one reproduce life from non-living matter? Apply science to these questions and answer them based upon that application and come back tell us how smart you are.

Everything we CAN explain is due to Science.
We used to have Fire, Lightning, and Fertility gods before we could explain them too.
10,000 gods all gone.

google 'God of the Gaps'

`

 

[abu afak]

Idiotic comparison

Why is that?
`

 

[Rogue AI]

Still whiffed my post and it's facts THREE Times.
You are the hack.
Empty POS one too.
You got no game.
You down 50 IQ points BOY.
`

Children who scream 'denier' are not interested in anything outside their narrow minded assumptions.

 

[abu afak]

Children who scream 'denier' are not interested in anything outside their narrow minded assumptions.

You accused someone else of being a denier.
I only responded and did so with basic evo facts.
I repeated 3 times to no answer. each time
Who is the denier?
and this makes FOUR posts with NO answer
Conspicuous denial.

26 'disagrees' in 10 minutes?
USMB record. (and optional vio for mods to give)
You are not even capable of 'disagreeing' with me at all obviously. Not once in words.
"two bit hack"?

`

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Applied science is a discipline that is used to apply existing scientific knowledge to develop more practical applications,”

Okay, it was only trying to add.to it. I get it. Developing red.meat for the engineers.

 

[Dagosa]

Okay, it was only trying to add.to it. I get it. Developing red.meat for the engineers.

Yup...agree. Working engineers are a valuable group that use applied science and as the name infers, try to develop other uses. But, like the Manhattan project among many others including Covid, its the theoretical science that develops the working theory for a primary use. Included in that development are actual trials which could last for months to decades before a working theory is developed or a primary application, either for saving people’s lives or killing them. But, nuclear energy has also saved and made many more lives easier then it has taken...so far..as has evolution science.

 

[Dagosa]

Applied science - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Applied science is the use of the scientific method and knowledge obtained via conclusions from the method to attain practical goals. It includes a broad range of disciplines such as engineering and medicine. Applied science is often contrasted with basic science, which is focused on advancing scientific theories and laws that explain and predict events in the natural world.

Applied science can also apply formal science, such as statistics and probability theory, as in epidemiology. Genetic epidemiology is an applied science applying both biological and statistical methods.

None of which can occur without a working theory first. The instance a person in applied science starts to tinker with and change an already working theory for the better he/she becomes a theoretical scientist.

When more applications for atomic energy wasdeveloped from the Manhattan project later, the working theory around nuclear energy was changed and enhanced. It happens all the time. In addition, Scientists don’t work with one theory at an time. They are ALL inter connected.

 

[Dagosa]

Applied science - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Applied science is the use of the scientific method and knowledge obtained via conclusions from the method to attain practical goals. It includes a broad range of disciplines such as engineering and medicine. Applied science is often contrasted with basic science, which is focused on advancing scientific theories and laws that explain and predict events in the natural world.

Applied science can also apply formal science, such as statistics and probability theory, as in epidemiology. Genetic epidemiology is an applied science applying both biological and statistical methods.

You’re just agreeing with us. Applied scientist use already established theories from this group among many others throughout the world. They number in the hundreds. Few are affiliated with Fix News.

​

Institution	Nation	No. of Highly Cited Researchers
1. Harvard University	USA	188
2. Chinese Academy of Sciences	Mainland China	124
3. Stanford University	USA	106
4. National Institutes of Health	USA	103
5. Max Planck Society	Germany	70
6. University of California Berkeley	USA	62
7. Broad Institute	USA	61
8. University of California San Diego	USA	56
9. Tsinghua University	Mainland China	55
10. Washington University of St Louis

 

[Dagosa]

Applied science is the use of the scientific method

As is theoretical science. Are we under the illusion that all science including theoretical and applied are not-interrelated ? They are. Theoretical science uses applied science in their trials to enhance and verify the theory(s). There is no scientist worth his salt that is not always thinking of other applications even while working on developing a theory. So I fail to see any disagreement that one over the other is preferable.

 

[Dagosa]

You fall for the liberal simpleton science. We scholars know it's both law and theory.

What's this law? In the language of science, the word "law" describes an analytic statement. It gives us a formula that tells us what things will do such as atheists will usually be wrong.

"Every point mass attracts every single point mass by a force pointing along the line intersecting both points. The force is directly proportional to the product of the two masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the point masses."

Without liberal thinking, science would not exist. Let’s look up the meaning of “ liberal” .

 

[Clyde 154]

Silly remarks of a science illiterate. I suppose you know more then the pentagon and every of nation in the world, all hospitals and 320 plus accredited universities in the world. Educated people know evolution, doofus crowd knows shit. Seriously, did you make to bio class ?

Yeah.........pot, kettle, black thingy? Consensus.......science. LMAO Liberal thingking: "They thought themselves wise........and became FOOLS".

Kind'a reminds me of the OLD WEST type Medicine Side Show and snake oil. Pay no attention to the reality that I have no FACTS as required when applying science.......let me sell you some ideas guaranteed to heal anything from warts to scurvy, its the latest thing from SOCIALISM, imported directly from the eastern ideology of Communism, we can replace your capacity for critical independent thinking with a consensus HERD MENTAILTY based upon feelings and emotions. Most importantly.......YOU WILL RECEIVE THE ACCOLADE OF ALL YOUR PEERS.

Come one! Come all! Rid yourself of those pesky little feelings of having a conscience.......sin with no feelings of guilt or judgment, direct your own morality......all it will cost you is one little Soul, that you are not using anyway........

"Beware least any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ". -- Col. 2:8

Beware the ISMS.

 

[Hollie]

joke? Again........applied science is real science, anything based upon mental projections is nothing but "philosophy"

"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools." -- Romans 1:22

Why can no one explain the origins of the universe as based upon the natural laws of physics? Why can no one reproduce life from non-living matter? Apply science to these questions and answer them based upon that application and come back tell us how smart you are.

I see this a lot from those with an anti-science agenda. Because not every question is answered, science, knowledge and learning is to be vilified and condemned as flawed and untrustworthy.

One could make the case that it was approximately the middle of the 19th century when tools and methods of science began to expand exponentially We began a transition away from superstitious beliefs thanks to the ever expanding success of science investigation and technology. The idea that science and reason are subordinate to fear and superstition is self-imposed blindness.

You want to denigrate science for not explaining the origin of the universe using “natural laws of physics”. Using those natural laws, science has largely (not entirely), explained the expansion of the universe to fractions of a second, Planck time, after the start of expansion. Those pesky natural laws of physics, motion, gravity seem to be consistent from Planck time going forward. Are you suggesting that natural laws are inferior and we need “un-natural laws” to gain a complete understanding?

The process of life developing from non-living matter, (abiogenesis), is not entirely understood. We know with absolute, 100% certainty abiogenesis occurred because life on the planet obviously exists. Either the process is natural or supernatural…. or maybe space aliens. If supernatural, how do we study or recreate it? Perhaps we don’t and just ignore it with, “we’ll never know”?

 

[Dagosa]

Yeah.........pot, kettle, black thingy? Consensus.......science. LMAO Liberal thingking: "They thought themselves wise........and became FOOLS".

Kind'a reminds me of the OLD WEST type Medicine Side Show and snake oil. Pay no attention to the reality that I have no FACTS as required when applying science.......let me sell you some ideas guaranteed to heal anything from warts to scurvy, its the latest thing from SOCIALISM, imported directly from the eastern ideology of Communism, we can replace your capacity for critical independent thinking with a consensus HERD MENTAILTY based upon feelings and emotions. Most importantly.......YOU WILL RECEIVE THE ACCOLADE OF ALL YOUR PEERS.

Come one! Come all! Rid yourself of those pesky little feelings of having a conscience.......sin with no feelings of guilt or judgment, direct your own morality......all it will cost you is one little Soul, that you are not using anyway........

"Beware least any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ". -- Col. 2:8

Beware the ISMS.

Did you post anything worth reading ?

 

[SmokeALib]

This is the science section, not the religion litterbox.

Make your arguments, if you can.

Many famous scientists were Christian. Issac Newton for one. Charles Townes established that a huge black hole exists in the center of our galaxy. Townes - a Christian - also invented the laser.

 

[SmokeALib]

Check out the movie Interstellar. The science in this movie is based on the book Gravitation, written by Nobel winning physicist Kip Thorne. In it, he explains that black holes couldn't exist without gravity.

Gravitational Waves Found: Kip Thorne Explains

Scientific American's Josh Fischman talks with renowned astrophysicist and general relativity expert Kip Thorne about the discovery of gravitational waves by the LIGO Project, co-founded by Thorne.

www.scientificamerican.com

 

[Dagosa]

Yeah.........pot, kettle, black thingy? Consensus.......science. LMAO Liberal thingking: "They thought themselves wise........and became FOOLS".

Kind'a reminds me of the OLD WEST type Medicine Side Show and snake oil. Pay no attention to the reality that I have no FACTS as required when applying science.......let me sell you some ideas guaranteed to heal anything from warts to scurvy, its the latest thing from SOCIALISM, imported directly from the eastern ideology of Communism, we can replace your capacity for critical independent thinking with a consensus HERD MENTAILTY based upon feelings and emotions. Most importantly.......YOU WILL RECEIVE THE ACCOLADE OF ALL YOUR PEERS.

Come one! Come all! Rid yourself of those pesky little feelings of having a conscience.......sin with no feelings of guilt or judgment, direct your own morality......all it will cost you is one little Soul, that you are not using anyway........

"Beware least any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ". -- Col. 2:8

Beware the ISMS.

So, you are smarter then every accredited university in the world. Amazing. You should be a chancellor.

 

[Clyde 154]

Did you post anything worth reading ?

Of course not.......the "isms" are not worth reading.

 

[Dagosa]

Of course not.......the "isms" are not worth reading.

So, What’s the “ism” of the week you’re laying on smarter people ?