War breaking out in Gaza.

[Linkiloo]

How does the plight of the palestinians benefit America?

Well you can use it to vilify Muslims, the Israelis use it which becomes a US issue.

How does that work? Using suffering folks to villify someone or anyone...makes no sense.

The muslims make themselves subject to villification by boing around the world killing innocent people in the name of their fake god allah.

Yes, it's bad, isn't it? The US will use anything and everything to get what they want, which is usually cheap oil.

Ah, yes, the Muslims go around killing innocent people. Just like the US does. It went into Iraq, maybe up to 1 million people have been killed there. It went into Afghanistan and killed some people there to. The US make itself subject to vilification, which leads to people FIGHTING BACK, which is what the Muslim terrorists are doing.

Oh so now terrorism is "fighting back". That must be the reason for terrorists to drive trucks into gatherings at the Christmas market in Berlin.

Well, up to 1 million people died in Iraq including many civilians.

How many have died in Europe and the US since 2003?

A lot less is the answer.

And that means that people should be murdered by terror on the streets of Berlin because......

 

[Mindful]

How does the plight of the palestinians benefit America?

How does supporting Israel benefit America?

Ask Trump. He just signed a HUUUUGE aid bill for Israel, our finest and most dependable ally. I think you will like this bill, Ivan.

The National Defense Authorization Act includes a bipartisan measure honoring an MOU between America and Israel, giving $3.8 billion annually to the Jewish state.

By: Jackson Richman/JNS and United with Israel Staff

US President Donald Trump signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) on Monday, which includes $550 million in assistance to Israel and temporarily halts the sale of F-35 fighter jets to Turkey. This comes amid tensions between Washington and Ankara, which is currently holding an American pastor hostage, among other political moves.

The $717 billion Act includes a bipartisan measure honoring a decade-long Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between America and Israel, with the US giving $3.8 billion annually to the Jewish state.

The NDAA, titled the “John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for 2019,” authorizes funds for research and development pertaining to weapon-defense systems, including the Iron Dome, David’s Sling, Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 that help Israel defend against missile and rocket threats.

Trump Approves Largest-Ever Aid Package to Israel

Disgusting, why do Americans not deserve healthcare, but we just got to aid genocidal Israel, an arm them to the teeth, as the villains they are.

1. Americans can buy their own healthcare and.
2.The second part of your question is fictional jabberwocky.

Can't Israelis buy their own defense?

Who paid for the Iron Dome?

 

[Linkiloo]

I could probably give it a go to prove you wrong on that.

I don't see how Malaysia is a fiasco. So it doesn't meet to your standards, oh well, but it functions as a country.

The UK is a political fiasco. You have a leader who can't lead, a guy below who keeps trying to destroy everything his party does so he can take down the leaders so he might become PM, the opposition is run by a complete muppet who'll never be PM and makes sure the other party stays in power just so he can rule over his own party.

France has a president who probably won't last too long, a former president who was up to a lot of dodgy business, it has a far right party doing quite well too.

We could go on all day. Everything is subjective based on what you pointed out.

UK is not a political fiasco. You have a Democaratic Process for elections and a judicial system based on laws and not Sharia BS. Economically the UK is strong. Socially you are allowed to be gay and not be prosecuted for it. You are allowed religious freedom, etc. You may watch any movie you want, read any book and listen to any music.

Nice try. Find me a mostly Muslim (60%+) country on par with the UK. Just one. I mean there are 50+. Surely you can find one? Right?

Thanks in advance.

Well, I'm saying it is. So there. It's all subjective, I say it is, you can't get past it.

Nice try.

So now you'll stomp your feet and cry because I proved you wrong? UK doesn't ban books or movies. It has a democractic voting process and a secular judicial process. You're killing your credibility with your comparison. Just be a man and admit you were wrong. We all make mistakes.

I'm not stomping my feet any more than you are.

You didn't prove your point at all.

It's all subjective. You said a political fiasco. I showed how it is a political fiasco, you decided that wasn't a political fiasco.

So then what do we have. You say no, I say yes. Can anyone be proven right or wrong? No, it's subjective.

Explained: Film censorship in the UK

"The Home Office, the Department of Culture Media and Sport, the British board of film classification, local councils and film distributors all have a say in what you can and can't see on videos and cinema screens in the UK. Sean Clarke explains how British censorship works"

The Guardian (it's British) seems to think you're wrong about film censorship.

"The Obscene Publications Act prohibits material which "tends to deprave or corrupt persons who are likely to read, see or hear it", and other laws apply specifically to video releases."

The thing is, people don't make films that aren't going to pass the board's criteria, because they know they'll lose money on it.

Malaysia bans some films, and then releases them later:

List of films banned in Malaysia - Wikipedia

You can see, even a film like Beauty and the Beast.

"Banned due to homosexual references in the movie. Disney rejected the Film Censorship Board's suggestions for an edited version, and thus held it from Malaysian release[31] until several days later where it was released without any cuts.[32]"

Released later without any cuts.

Franklin Graham Calls for 'Beauty and the Beast' Boycott Over Gay Character

Here's a religious dude in the US calling for a boycott.

Again, we could go on all day about this.

Does it matter?

I said social, economic or political. Nice try.

For him since no countries are "perfect", western democracies are as free as dictatorships. Very logical. Not.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I could probably give it a go to prove you wrong on that.

I don't see how Malaysia is a fiasco. So it doesn't meet to your standards, oh well, but it functions as a country.

The UK is a political fiasco. You have a leader who can't lead, a guy below who keeps trying to destroy everything his party does so he can take down the leaders so he might become PM, the opposition is run by a complete muppet who'll never be PM and makes sure the other party stays in power just so he can rule over his own party.

France has a president who probably won't last too long, a former president who was up to a lot of dodgy business, it has a far right party doing quite well too.

We could go on all day. Everything is subjective based on what you pointed out.

UK is not a political fiasco. You have a Democaratic Process for elections and a judicial system based on laws and not Sharia BS. Economically the UK is strong. Socially you are allowed to be gay and not be prosecuted for it. You are allowed religious freedom, etc. You may watch any movie you want, read any book and listen to any music.

Nice try. Find me a mostly Muslim (60%+) country on par with the UK. Just one. I mean there are 50+. Surely you can find one? Right?

Thanks in advance.

Well, I'm saying it is. So there. It's all subjective, I say it is, you can't get past it.

Nice try.

So now you'll stomp your feet and cry because I proved you wrong? UK doesn't ban books or movies. It has a democractic voting process and a secular judicial process. You're killing your credibility with your comparison. Just be a man and admit you were wrong. We all make mistakes.

I'm not stomping my feet any more than you are.

You didn't prove your point at all.

It's all subjective. You said a political fiasco. I showed how it is a political fiasco, you decided that wasn't a political fiasco.

So then what do we have. You say no, I say yes. Can anyone be proven right or wrong? No, it's subjective.

Explained: Film censorship in the UK

"The Home Office, the Department of Culture Media and Sport, the British board of film classification, local councils and film distributors all have a say in what you can and can't see on videos and cinema screens in the UK. Sean Clarke explains how British censorship works"

The Guardian (it's British) seems to think you're wrong about film censorship.

"The Obscene Publications Act prohibits material which "tends to deprave or corrupt persons who are likely to read, see or hear it", and other laws apply specifically to video releases."

The thing is, people don't make films that aren't going to pass the board's criteria, because they know they'll lose money on it.

Malaysia bans some films, and then releases them later:

List of films banned in Malaysia - Wikipedia

You can see, even a film like Beauty and the Beast.

"Banned due to homosexual references in the movie. Disney rejected the Film Censorship Board's suggestions for an edited version, and thus held it from Malaysian release[31] until several days later where it was released without any cuts.[32]"

Released later without any cuts.

Franklin Graham Calls for 'Beauty and the Beast' Boycott Over Gay Character

Here's a religious dude in the US calling for a boycott.

Again, we could go on all day about this.

Does it matter?

Don't be silly. It is not "all subjective". That is like saying "all countries have crime" when there is a massive difference and everybody knows it. There are differences no matter how much you pretend there aren't.

But then again the word "fiasco" was used. That is subjective.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Well, the main reason arabs are so popular with the democrats is their cultural 'enlightenment' and practices of butt raping little boys. Pretty tough for Jewish culture to top that pastime in the hearts and minds of mentally ill faggots and the other degenerates the Party relies on for a base now..

Israelis are Far Left, and Arabs are Far Right.

But, 1/2 of Democrat funding is from Jewish sources, and a lot of Jews are pedos, and perverts, like Metzitzah B'peh, Harvey Weinstein, Jared Fogel, Roman Polanski, Elliot Spitzer etc

Eh, Israel has been quite to the right for a long time now. Hamas is also on the right.

The right like to use nationalistic, patriotic, violent tactics to keep their people interested in their limited skills as CEOs of the company that is their country.

That moment when anti-semites can't decide whether the Jews are left or right but agree that they are to blame.

Wait, what? Jews can't be both right and left? WTF are you blabbering about. Americans are left or right?

******* hell.

If only anti-semites could agree because we know they must be to blame.

Ah, completely ignore what I said and make some nonsense comment.

Wow, that really helped this conversation along. I meant die there.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Well you can use it to vilify Muslims, the Israelis use it which becomes a US issue.

How does that work? Using suffering folks to villify someone or anyone...makes no sense.

The muslims make themselves subject to villification by boing around the world killing innocent people in the name of their fake god allah.

Yes, it's bad, isn't it? The US will use anything and everything to get what they want, which is usually cheap oil.

Ah, yes, the Muslims go around killing innocent people. Just like the US does. It went into Iraq, maybe up to 1 million people have been killed there. It went into Afghanistan and killed some people there to. The US make itself subject to vilification, which leads to people FIGHTING BACK, which is what the Muslim terrorists are doing.

Oh so now terrorism is "fighting back". That must be the reason for terrorists to drive trucks into gatherings at the Christmas market in Berlin.

Well, up to 1 million people died in Iraq including many civilians.

How many have died in Europe and the US since 2003?

A lot less is the answer.

And that means that people should be murdered by terror on the streets of Berlin because......

What the ****?

You like twisting shit, don't you?

If you go to war, people die. But people seem to think only the enemy should die, that we can all go to war, and no one will die, and it'll be great and happy.

Why? When has war ever been like this?

 

[frigidweirdo]

UK is not a political fiasco. You have a Democaratic Process for elections and a judicial system based on laws and not Sharia BS. Economically the UK is strong. Socially you are allowed to be gay and not be prosecuted for it. You are allowed religious freedom, etc. You may watch any movie you want, read any book and listen to any music.

Nice try. Find me a mostly Muslim (60%+) country on par with the UK. Just one. I mean there are 50+. Surely you can find one? Right?

Thanks in advance.

Well, I'm saying it is. So there. It's all subjective, I say it is, you can't get past it.

Nice try.

So now you'll stomp your feet and cry because I proved you wrong? UK doesn't ban books or movies. It has a democractic voting process and a secular judicial process. You're killing your credibility with your comparison. Just be a man and admit you were wrong. We all make mistakes.

I'm not stomping my feet any more than you are.

You didn't prove your point at all.

It's all subjective. You said a political fiasco. I showed how it is a political fiasco, you decided that wasn't a political fiasco.

So then what do we have. You say no, I say yes. Can anyone be proven right or wrong? No, it's subjective.

Explained: Film censorship in the UK

"The Home Office, the Department of Culture Media and Sport, the British board of film classification, local councils and film distributors all have a say in what you can and can't see on videos and cinema screens in the UK. Sean Clarke explains how British censorship works"

The Guardian (it's British) seems to think you're wrong about film censorship.

"The Obscene Publications Act prohibits material which "tends to deprave or corrupt persons who are likely to read, see or hear it", and other laws apply specifically to video releases."

The thing is, people don't make films that aren't going to pass the board's criteria, because they know they'll lose money on it.

Malaysia bans some films, and then releases them later:

List of films banned in Malaysia - Wikipedia

You can see, even a film like Beauty and the Beast.

"Banned due to homosexual references in the movie. Disney rejected the Film Censorship Board's suggestions for an edited version, and thus held it from Malaysian release[31] until several days later where it was released without any cuts.[32]"

Released later without any cuts.

Franklin Graham Calls for 'Beauty and the Beast' Boycott Over Gay Character

Here's a religious dude in the US calling for a boycott.

Again, we could go on all day about this.

Does it matter?

I said social, economic or political. Nice try.

For him since no countries are "perfect", western democracies are as free as dictatorships. Very logical. Not.

Which is complete bullshit, seeing as I never said that. You just made that up. You go along a path you think is "logical", and then you ask questions and interpret the answers to mean something they don't mean. Then you come to this all encompassing conclusion which is so far from what that person thinks, but you don't care, because you make it look like you're right all the damn time.

 

[Picaro]

Well, the main reason arabs are so popular with the democrats is their cultural 'enlightenment' and practices of butt raping little boys. Pretty tough for Jewish culture to top that pastime in the hearts and minds of mentally ill faggots and the other degenerates the Party relies on for a base now..

Israelis are Far Left, and Arabs are Far Right.

But, 1/2 of Democrat funding is from Jewish sources, and a lot of Jews are pedos, and perverts, like Metzitzah B'peh, Harvey Weinstein, Jared Fogel, Roman Polanski, Elliot Spitzer etc

Eh, Israel has been quite to the right for a long time now. Hamas is also on the right.

The right like to use nationalistic, patriotic, violent tactics to keep their people interested in their limited skills as CEOs of the company that is their country.

That moment when anti-semites can't decide whether the Jews are left or right but agree that they are to blame.

They're just ridiculous dope-addled deviants and sociopaths, so don't go looking for anything that makes sense from these parrots; they're just dutiful bots running around repeating what they're told to by their peer group.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

UK is not a political fiasco. You have a Democaratic Process for elections and a judicial system based on laws and not Sharia BS. Economically the UK is strong. Socially you are allowed to be gay and not be prosecuted for it. You are allowed religious freedom, etc. You may watch any movie you want, read any book and listen to any music.

Nice try. Find me a mostly Muslim (60%+) country on par with the UK. Just one. I mean there are 50+. Surely you can find one? Right?

Thanks in advance.

Well, I'm saying it is. So there. It's all subjective, I say it is, you can't get past it.

Nice try.

So now you'll stomp your feet and cry because I proved you wrong? UK doesn't ban books or movies. It has a democractic voting process and a secular judicial process. You're killing your credibility with your comparison. Just be a man and admit you were wrong. We all make mistakes.

I'm not stomping my feet any more than you are.

You didn't prove your point at all.

It's all subjective. You said a political fiasco. I showed how it is a political fiasco, you decided that wasn't a political fiasco.

So then what do we have. You say no, I say yes. Can anyone be proven right or wrong? No, it's subjective.


Explained: Film censorship in the UK

"The Home Office, the Department of Culture Media and Sport, the British board of film classification, local councils and film distributors all have a say in what you can and can't see on videos and cinema screens in the UK. Sean Clarke explains how British censorship works"

The Guardian (it's British) seems to think you're wrong about film censorship.

"The Obscene Publications Act prohibits material which "tends to deprave or corrupt persons who are likely to read, see or hear it", and other laws apply specifically to video releases."

The thing is, people don't make films that aren't going to pass the board's criteria, because they know they'll lose money on it.

Malaysia bans some films, and then releases them later:

List of films banned in Malaysia - Wikipedia

You can see, even a film like Beauty and the Beast.

"Banned due to homosexual references in the movie. Disney rejected the Film Censorship Board's suggestions for an edited version, and thus held it from Malaysian release[31] until several days later where it was released without any cuts.[32]"

Released later without any cuts.

Franklin Graham Calls for 'Beauty and the Beast' Boycott Over Gay Character

Here's a religious dude in the US calling for a boycott.

Again, we could go on all day about this.

Does it matter?

Don't be silly. It is not "all subjective". That is like saying "all countries have crime" when there is a massive difference and everybody knows it. There are differences no matter how much you pretend there aren't.

But then again the word "fiasco" was used. That is subjective.

What word should I use? I tried to make it short. Name one mostly Muslim country (60%) that does not have major issues when compared to western nations in terms of social/economic/military.

I mean you get the gist. Do you not? Because the answer is there is not one.

 

[Hossfly]

How does the plight of the palestinians benefit America?

How does supporting Israel benefit America?

Ask Trump. He just signed a HUUUUGE aid bill for Israel, our finest and most dependable ally. I think you will like this bill, Ivan.

The National Defense Authorization Act includes a bipartisan measure honoring an MOU between America and Israel, giving $3.8 billion annually to the Jewish state.

By: Jackson Richman/JNS and United with Israel Staff

US President Donald Trump signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) on Monday, which includes $550 million in assistance to Israel and temporarily halts the sale of F-35 fighter jets to Turkey. This comes amid tensions between Washington and Ankara, which is currently holding an American pastor hostage, among other political moves.

The $717 billion Act includes a bipartisan measure honoring a decade-long Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between America and Israel, with the US giving $3.8 billion annually to the Jewish state.

The NDAA, titled the “John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for 2019,” authorizes funds for research and development pertaining to weapon-defense systems, including the Iron Dome, David’s Sling, Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 that help Israel defend against missile and rocket threats.

Trump Approves Largest-Ever Aid Package to Israel

Disgusting, why do Americans not deserve healthcare, but we just got to aid genocidal Israel, an arm them to the teeth, as the villains they are.

1. Americans can buy their own healthcare and.
2.The second part of your question is fictional jabberwocky.

Can't Israelis buy their own defense?

Yes. They buy it at Dollar Tree.

 

[Mindful]

The misery of life in Gaza:


Gazan Teenager’s Vlog an Inconvenient Truth for the Israel Haters & Mainstream Media

 

[frigidweirdo]

Well, I'm saying it is. So there. It's all subjective, I say it is, you can't get past it.

Nice try.

So now you'll stomp your feet and cry because I proved you wrong? UK doesn't ban books or movies. It has a democractic voting process and a secular judicial process. You're killing your credibility with your comparison. Just be a man and admit you were wrong. We all make mistakes.

I'm not stomping my feet any more than you are.

You didn't prove your point at all.

It's all subjective. You said a political fiasco. I showed how it is a political fiasco, you decided that wasn't a political fiasco.

So then what do we have. You say no, I say yes. Can anyone be proven right or wrong? No, it's subjective.


Explained: Film censorship in the UK

"The Home Office, the Department of Culture Media and Sport, the British board of film classification, local councils and film distributors all have a say in what you can and can't see on videos and cinema screens in the UK. Sean Clarke explains how British censorship works"

The Guardian (it's British) seems to think you're wrong about film censorship.

"The Obscene Publications Act prohibits material which "tends to deprave or corrupt persons who are likely to read, see or hear it", and other laws apply specifically to video releases."

The thing is, people don't make films that aren't going to pass the board's criteria, because they know they'll lose money on it.

Malaysia bans some films, and then releases them later:

List of films banned in Malaysia - Wikipedia

You can see, even a film like Beauty and the Beast.

"Banned due to homosexual references in the movie. Disney rejected the Film Censorship Board's suggestions for an edited version, and thus held it from Malaysian release[31] until several days later where it was released without any cuts.[32]"

Released later without any cuts.

Franklin Graham Calls for 'Beauty and the Beast' Boycott Over Gay Character

Here's a religious dude in the US calling for a boycott.

Again, we could go on all day about this.

Does it matter?

Don't be silly. It is not "all subjective". That is like saying "all countries have crime" when there is a massive difference and everybody knows it. There are differences no matter how much you pretend there aren't.

But then again the word "fiasco" was used. That is subjective.

What word should I use? I tried to make it short. Name one mostly Muslim country (60%) that does not have major issues when compared to western nations in terms of social/economic/military.

I mean you get the gist. Do you not? Because the answer is there is not one.

The problem here is that this is one of those things where someone tries to limit everything to the point where it says what they want it to say.

Name one politician for fuckballs Nebraska that has pink hair and lives in a traitor called Dorothy with his mum.

No, I doubt there'll be one because you've decided there isn't one, and any time anyone tries to say anything, you say "no". And that's that, there can't be one, because you've already set the hidden criteria.

So, what's the ******* point of even discussing things?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It seems they never learn. The palestinians could have had peace with Israel years ago and with very good terms.

Now they are facing sever repercussions from their continued rocket attacks etc. on Israel.


IDF says war in Gaza approaching, communities near Strip could be evacuated

wow you are seriously misinformed big time and have been listening wayyyyy to much to what the Israel controlled news here in the states tells you with their biased reporting.Pretty much impossible for the palestines to have peace with a country that is always shooting unarmed babies and women in the heads who are just walking the streets minding their own freaking business.get a clue.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Peace would be better than all this fighting.

Of course and Israel has done everything possible to achieve it. The radical muslims are simply unwilling to accept any sort of peace unless it is based on total submission to Islam. Thus they suffer and will continue to suffer.

yeah they have done everything they could to achieve it thats WHY they shoot unarmed women and children in the back of their heads in palestine when just walking their own streets minding their own business cause war monger Israel has done everything to achieve it. grow the **** up.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Peace would be better than all this fighting.

Of course and Israel has done everything possible to achieve it. The radical muslims are simply unwilling to accept any sort of peace unless it is based on total submission to Islam. Thus they suffer and will continue to suffer.

I do NOT agree with the Palestinians launching rockets against Israel. It is wrong and stupid and will get them no where. Peaceful Protest is the way to freedom for them.


However...on this subject your apparent, general attitude towards the Palestinians and Israeli government is ridiculous.

'Remarks from Benjamin Netanyahu
In a 2001 video, Netanyahu, reportedly unaware he was being recorded, said: "They asked me before the election if I'd honor [the Oslo accords]... I said I would, but [that] I'm going to interpret the accords in such a way that would allow me to put an end to this galloping forward to the '67 borders. How did we do it? Nobody said what defined military zones were. Defined military zones are security zones; as far as I'm concerned, the entire Jordan Valley is a defined military zone. Go argue."[10][11] Netanyahu then explained how he conditioned his signing of the 1997 Hebron agreement on American consent that there be no withdrawals from "specified military locations", and insisted he be allowed to specify which areas constituted a "military location"—such as the whole of the Jordan Valley. "Why is that important? Because from that moment on I stopped the Oslo Accords", Netanyahu affirmed.[12] However, this is clearly consistent with Yitzhak Rabin's October 1995 statement to the Knesset on the ratification of the interim Oslo agreement: "B. The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term."'

Oslo I Accord - Wikipedia

Netanyahu had ZERO intention of honoring the Oslo accords. ZERO.


'5 million — Number of Palestinians currently living in foreign refugee camps.
_________

8,701 — Number of Palestinians killed by Israelis since 2000.

1,138 — Number of Israelis killed by Palestinians since 2000.

8:1 — Ratio of Palestinian-Israeli deaths since 2000.
_________

1,772 — Number of Palestinian children killed by Israelis since 2000.

93 — Number of Israeli children killed by Palestinians since 2000.

19:1 — Ratio of Palestinian-Israeli child deaths since 2000.
_________

$3 billion — Average annual US aid to Israel over the past 20 years.

25% — Percentage of the entire annual US foreign aid budget that goes to Israel.'

Israel-Palestine: By the Numbers

Yeah...Israel just had to kill almost 8 times as many Palestinians and 19 times as many innocent children as the reverse. That is what you call Israel doing everything possible for peace? What a hate-filled buffoon you must be...at least on this subject.

And your handle is a song from the 50's...LOL. Jeez...you must be at least 70.

Typical Trumpbot (if that is what you are). An old, ignorant, angry, probably uneducated person who is (sadly) set in his ways and will NEVER change. You are also probably xenophobic, racist and misogynistic to boot.

But now that that is established, I can move on and ignore you. I try to not waste time with hate-filled, set-in-their-ways, useless people like yourself.


Have a wonderful life...what there is left of it.

you just owned the OP's sorry ass here.

 

[Picaro]

It seems they never learn. The palestinians could have had peace with Israel years ago and with very good terms.

Now they are facing sever repercussions from their continued rocket attacks etc. on Israel.


IDF says war in Gaza approaching, communities near Strip could be evacuated

wow you are seriously misinformed big time and have been listening wayyyyy to much to what the Israel controlled news here in the states tells you with their biased reporting.Pretty much impossible for the palestines to have peace with a country that is always shooting unarmed babies and women in the heads who are just walking the streets minding their own freaking business.get a clue.

OH NOES!!!

Cuz ...... JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!

 

[MacTheKnife]

Bout time to inject a lil moe twuth in heah.............' The failure of Palestinian Arabs to pursue peace can be traced back 100 years with defiance to any form of Jewish sovereignty. The Palestinians could have had peace and their own state had their leaders recognized Israel's overtures by bargaining in good faith, renouncing violence and recognizing Israel's right to exist but did not. They had no less than seven opportunities to do so but did not. Instead, they acted with reckless abandon to bring about the destruction of the Jewish state and Jewish people.'

Seven Times Palestinians Rejected Peace

Palestinians need a leader with energy, integrity and vision, one who might have a better chance of achieving Palestinian independence and enabling both peoples to live in peace.

Opinion | Let Abbas’s Vile Words Be His Last as Palestinian Leader

 

[TrueTT]

God Bless Israel and (his) Jewish people. In Jesus' name.

May their Jihadist enemies forever perish.

 

[Linkiloo]

How does that work? Using suffering folks to villify someone or anyone...makes no sense.

The muslims make themselves subject to villification by boing around the world killing innocent people in the name of their fake god allah.

Yes, it's bad, isn't it? The US will use anything and everything to get what they want, which is usually cheap oil.

Ah, yes, the Muslims go around killing innocent people. Just like the US does. It went into Iraq, maybe up to 1 million people have been killed there. It went into Afghanistan and killed some people there to. The US make itself subject to vilification, which leads to people FIGHTING BACK, which is what the Muslim terrorists are doing.

Oh so now terrorism is "fighting back". That must be the reason for terrorists to drive trucks into gatherings at the Christmas market in Berlin.

Well, up to 1 million people died in Iraq including many civilians.

How many have died in Europe and the US since 2003?

A lot less is the answer.

And that means that people should be murdered by terror on the streets of Berlin because......

What the ****?

You like twisting shit, don't you?

If you go to war, people die. But people seem to think only the enemy should die, that we can all go to war, and no one will die, and it'll be great and happy.

Why? When has war ever been like this?

Fully agree so why are the palestinians bitching non-stop?

 

[gtopa1]

Weren't they supposed to negotiate a long term truce in 2014?

What happened to that? I haven't heard anything.

Can you spell H-A-M-A-S, Tinny.

Who was Israel's boogyman before there was a Hamas?

Wazzafat!!

Greg