Wanted bus bomber killed 10/22.

[toastman]

You were hoping to avoid the subject, but instead you posted this massive thing !!




Thanks though, the information you provided is very helpful for my understanding of the refugee problem

 

[toastman]

Lets assume Israel did allow for the right of return of 500 000 Palestinian refugees.

Well, after reading your post, it seems like it would be a near impossible mission ...

Of course, Right of Return is not going to happen

 

[RoccoR]

toastman,

This is a very low activity thread. The subject is very controversial and inflammatory.

You were hoping to avoid the subject, but instead you posted this massive thing !!

Thanks though, the information you provided is very helpful for my understanding of the refugee problem

(COMMENT)

It is a compliance oriented question. Either people meet certain criteria or they do not. It is a topic that is divorced of the normal humanitarian feelings. It is why you rarely find tables, graphs and charts that actually answer the question as to how many Arab-Palestinians today, are GA/RES/194(III) eligible.

Most Arab-Palestinians will say that they are, but when put to the test, are actually not.

There is an interesting study, pro-Palestinian (but then all Humanitarian studies are pro-PAL), on the topic. It openly says that most of the registrants maintain their status looking for some windfall compensation. It is like waiting for some relative to die in order to scavenge the inheritance.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[RoccoR]

toastman, et al,

We don't know that.

Lets assume Israel did allow for the right of return of 500 000 Palestinian refugees.

Well, after reading your post, it seems like it would be a near impossible mission ...

Of course, Right of Return is not going to happen

(COMMENT)

Again, this would depend on the risk assessment and the Hand Rule (B=>lp) that the reconciliation estimate comes up with in the negotiations.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[docmauser1]

Again, this would depend on the risk assessment and the Hand Rule (B=>lp) that the reconciliation estimate comes up with in the negotiations.

Ah, palistanians want palistan and Israel too, of course.

 

[RoccoR]

docmauser1, et al,

This would be consistent with both the original "solemn oath" and todays Covenant and Charter.

Again, this would depend on the risk assessment and the Hand Rule (B=>lp) that the reconciliation estimate comes up with in the negotiations.

Ah, palistanians want palistan and Israel too, of course.

(COMMENT)

They consider the entire former Mandate, less Jordan, as indivisible.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[docmauser1]

docmauser1, et al,
This would be consistent with both the original "solemn oath" and todays Covenant and Charter.

Again, this would depend on the risk assessment and the Hand Rule (B=>lp) that the reconciliation estimate comes up with in the negotiations.

Ah, palistanians want palistan and Israel too, of course.

(COMMENT)
They consider the entire former Mandate, less Jordan, as indivisible.

The minimum of palistanian 'wants' is way over the maximum Israel may give, of course.