Walz Signs Bill Protecting Access To Puberty Blockers, Gender Surgery

The decision to permanently cut off your dick is far more profound and significant than the decision to have sex or get a tattoo.

Use some common sense, man.

You cannot have it both ways with respect to informed consent.

Trump Vows to Ban Menstruation​


AUG 09, 2024




Joe Raedle/Getty Images

DETROIT (The Borowitz Report)—Calling it “the most disgusting thing Democrats ever came up with,” Donald J. Trump told supporters on Friday that as president he would ban menstruation.

“Crazy Kamala, Tampon Tim, and the far-left Democrats are in favor of this terrible thing,” he said. “They’re even providing supplies for it.”

Claiming that “no one menstruated” when he was president, he added, “This should never be allowed to happen in our country.”
Trump declared that he and JD Vance would “stop the flow of illegal menstruation” by requiring women to remain pregnant “at all times,” vowing, “I will build the uterine wall.”
 
You “ cant certainly”? How stereotypical.

How about some commentary with that link, child? Do you acknowledge the fact that your beloved Florida medical board does allow surgery on the genitals of children?
 
How about some commentary with that link, child? Do you acknowledge the fact that your beloved Florida medical board does allow surgery on the genitals of children?
How about we acknowledge some commentary that elected senate representatives banned your precious child mutilation.
 
Guns aren't killing kids, criminals are you cannot unarm people who do not care about your bans, IE criminals
Developed countries with stricter gun control laws have far lower homicide rates and very rarely have school shootings.

Decades go by without school shootings.
 
Do you know how weird it is to be talking about healthcare and have some deplorable like yourself want to talk about children's underwear instead?
That's another thing.

Calling child mutilation "healthcare" has to be one of the sickest things I have ever heard.
 
In fact Florida's ban was criticized by medical professionals who practice gender care and overturned by a federal judge.
First, that judge was a Clinton appointee.

Second, the Florida ban overreached by banning transgender treatment for adults as well as children.

Third, the judge did not overturn the ban on surgical procedures for minors.
 
I don't care about your Simp feelings.
That's the general attitude of Democrats toward taking the lives of the unborn and mutilating children.

Allowing kids to be mutilated is a losing issue for you nutjobs.

A supermajority of Americans are opposed to this.
 
The Post-KFF poll found significant opposition to gender-affirming medical care for children and teens. Nearly 7 in 10 adults said they oppose allowing children ages 10 to 14 access to medication that stops the body from going through puberty, and nearly 6 in 10 oppose giving 15- to 17-year-olds access to hormone treatments. (There was, however, majority support for gender-affirming counseling or therapy, with more than 6 in 10 supporting this for both age groups.)

 
First, that judge was a Clinton appointee.

Second, the Florida ban overreached by banning transgender treatment for adults as well as children.

Third, the judge did not overturn the ban on surgical procedures for minors.
Only because it wasn't challenged. I'm not sure if any of those families even had standing to challenge that provision. They're children might not yet be seeking surgical care and again the Florida medical board still allows surgery to be performed on the genitalia of children without their consent so long as they're intersexed. This isn't about science but the Rights culture war. Like always they have things ass backwards. It should be intersex newborns being protected from the will of their parents and doctors from having their genitals operated on without their consent.
 
The Post-KFF poll found significant opposition to gender-affirming medical care for children and teens. Nearly 7 in 10 adults said they oppose allowing children ages 10 to 14 access to medication that stops the body from going through puberty, and nearly 6 in 10 oppose giving 15- to 17-year-olds access to hormone treatments. (There was, however, majority support for gender-affirming counseling or therapy, with more than 6 in 10 supporting this for both age groups.)

I don't give a shit. I don't think anyone access to care should be determined by the polling results of the uneducated masses.
 
How about some commentary with that link, child? Do you acknowledge the fact that your beloved Florida medical board does allow surgery on the genitals of children?
No, it does not. The judge did not overturn that ban.
 
I don't give a shit. I don't think anyone access to care should be determined by the polling results of the uneducated masses.
First, let me ask you: What you would think about a law which allows parents to give consent to their 12 year old to have sex with a 50 year old?

What would you think of that law? What would you think of a parent who gave that consent?

Next, here is how the law was described in Minnesota which Governor Walz signed into law::

The age at which trans minors receive gender-affirming hormone therapy depends on the patient’s ability to provide informed consent for the treatment, which can happen when they’re as young as 12 or 13 years old.




Next, this:

For the eyes of the law to recognize a person’s consent, that person must be of a specific age, most often between 16 and 18. In Minnesota, the consenting age is 16 years old, which means a person must be at least 16 to be considered competent enough to consent to sexual activity with another individual.



How can you fail to see the insanity and the contradiction there?

Democrats are nuts.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom