*Wait For It Assassin's, Bullets; NOW SHOOT!!!!*

Wait For It Assassin's, Bullets; NOW SHOOT!!



Common sense tell us that this was a set up to have President Trump killed.
 
Sorry bout that

1. They aimed guns at the dead shooter, way before they shot, the angle of the gun that was on camera proves it.
2. So they allowed this shooter to shoot at the President, before they returned fire?
3. Really?
4. Thats company policy?
5. So a guy perched on a building lying down, aiming his rifle at the President, is given green light to fire at will, then they will take out the threat afterwards, but they gotta be sure he will shoot, by allowing him time, to squeeze off, a few rounds, eh?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Been their policy for years as an ex secret service interviewed on Sunday said.
 
Sorry bout that

1. They aimed guns at the dead shooter, way before they shot, the angle of the gun that was on camera proves it.
2. So they allowed this shooter to shoot at the President, before they returned fire?
3. Really?
4. Thats company policy?
5. So a guy perched on a building lying down, aiming his rifle at the President, is given green light to fire at will, then they will take out the threat afterwards, but they gotta be sure he will shoot, by allowing him time, to squeeze off, a few rounds, eh?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
One thing I haven’t heard is why they put two snipers side by side.

Combat 101: flank your target. Those snipers should have been 90-120 degrees apart. That gives you good visibility if one view is blocked from an area. And if shooting starts you’ve now got a kill zone and your target can’t hide behind someone or something.
 
Been their policy for years as an ex secret service interviewed on Sunday said.
Sorry bout that,

1. Really?
2. Its crazy if thats something that came out of law enforcements mouth.
3. Link it or it didn't happen.
4. Cops of everywhere, need to see this, cops shoot first, before the perp has a chance to shoot, swing a knife, go for a bomb, never do they allow to peel off a few rounds.
5. That CIA dude you saw is flat out wrong.
6. You are making shit up.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
No, those
Those are urban legends. If the SS was THAT agressive, we would hear stories about people getting their heads blown off. I promise you that sniper needs permission to shoot someone, unless they are an imminent threat. We really dont know what the sniper was able to see.

Also, these SS guys are patriots. Never in a million years are you going to get a Secret Service agent to become a presidential assassin, or take part in an assassination of the guy they are oath bound to protect. Its just not going to hapoen.

Also, wouldnt they almost certainly get busted after the first SS agent they ask to kill the president? Or did they just get super lucky and randomly found the one psycho in our nations history who would do this?

This scenario seems less likely than the Lochness monster.
Are
Been their policy for years as an ex secret service interviewed on Sunday said.
Bullshit
 
One thing I haven’t heard is why they put two snipers side by side.

Combat 101: flank your target. Those snipers should have been 90-120 degrees apart. That gives you good visibility if one view is blocked from an area. And if shooting starts you’ve now got a kill zone and your target can’t hide behind someone or something.
Sorry bout that,

1. Yeah why two snipers in one nest?
2. Thats a good question, I didn't see that, thanks.
3. Two snipers incase one fell asleep?
4. Why?
5. For one to keep an eye on the other?
6. Give us a reason.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Sorry bout that,

1. Yeah why two snipers in one nest?
2. Thats a good question, I didn't see that, thanks.
3. Two snipers incase one fell asleep?
4. Why?
5. For one to keep an eye on the other?
6. Give us a reason.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
That's a sniper and his spotter. That's how sniper teams are set up.
 
I'm skeptical.

There definitely was something wrong but I'm not ready to jump on the conspiracy bandwagon. I have too many questions.

Whether he missed or killed Trump, they were in for a lot of questions as we already have seen. They had to know that. If it was intentional, why would they be so sloppy?

I'm still on the side of complete incompetence on their part. EVERYONE in the Biden administration is utterly incompetent, from Biden on down.
Indeed.

I assumed they had noticed the people who were pointing to the rooftop, trying to alert authorities (that's been documented) and were looking through their scopes in that direction, but unfortunately didn't see him until he started firing.

And, sure, it's possible they were told to stand down. But that does seem unlikely.
 
15th post
1721512822568.webp
 
Many people were telling police on the ground for many minutes before the shooting. they did nothing nothing.

Also, how could you not know that guy wasnt a cop based on what he was wearing?

If there’s any uncertainty, you pull the president off the stage.

This was the greatest gaffe in secret service history.. so much so that it’s healthy to wonder if there were higher powers giving orders so they could take him out, since their guy is likely to lose power

I am willing to agree that it was a huge mistake on their part. As this continues to play out, it is become more and more clear that the Secret Service Leadership really screwed up.
 
Back
Top Bottom