- Sep 19, 2011
- 28,668
- 10,210
- 900
University of Michigan computer scientist J. Alex Halderman, who wrote the report on which the advisory is based, has long argued that using digital technology to record votes is dangerous because computers are inherently vulnerable to hacking and thus require multiple safeguards that aren’t uniformly followed.
He and many other election security experts have insisted that using hand-marked paper ballots is the most secure method of voting and the only option that allows for meaningful post-election audits.
I've put this up several times and haven't had ANY one dispute the confusion that these JUNK MAIL voting documents illustrate.
These 3 examples are why JUNK MAIL voting has problems.
The signatures on the mail in ballot is very different than the signature on the voter file.
Thus we have at least "2,000 Mules" delivering mail in ballots counted by the same above computer systems!
He and many other election security experts have insisted that using hand-marked paper ballots is the most secure method of voting and the only option that allows for meaningful post-election audits.
Cyber agency: Voting software vulnerable in some states
The nation’s leading cybersecurity agency says electronic voting machines from a leading vendor used in at least 16 states have software vulnerabilities
abcnews.go.com
These 3 examples are why JUNK MAIL voting has problems.
The signatures on the mail in ballot is very different than the signature on the voter file.
Thus we have at least "2,000 Mules" delivering mail in ballots counted by the same above computer systems!