Voters disapprove 66 - 31% of the president using emergency powers to fund border wall

[HappyJoy]

If you thought that the shutdown hurt Republicans politically, wait until Trump declares a phony national emergency to build his wall:

Voters disapprove 66 - 31 percent of the president using emergency powers to fund a wall along the border.

QU Poll Release Detail

Every poll right before the election of 2016 had Hillary winning. Next.

Winning the popular vote which she did. Next.

There were many polls showing she was going to smoke his ass in the EC.
Its a wash out.
Polls are only good for people with confirmation bias.

Those aren't polls, you don't know what a poll is.

 

[Papageorgio]

No one had Trump winning the popular vote or the Electoral College in 2016.

Here Are 7 Electoral College Predictions for Tuesday

I thought for sure Trump was going to lose big time, however I never thought he would have been the nominee.

All polls are, are a snapshot of attitudes at the time of the poll. I wouldn't put faith in them.

 

[mudwhistle]

If you thought that the shutdown hurt Republicans politically, wait until Trump declares a phony national emergency to build his wall:

Voters disapprove 66 - 31 percent of the president using emergency powers to fund a wall along the border.

QU Poll Release Detail

Nazi Pelosi is leaving him with no choice

 

[Pilot1]

Alabama nor any state without large metro areas that dominate the entire state can not dictate to the U.S. so that thought is ridiculous.

The polls said Hillary would be elected President, and that only happens with the EC vote. Maybe they were confusing the meaning of popular vote vs EC vote, but they all said she'd be President. Not just election prediction analysis.

 

[bendog]

It'll depend on Coulter telling him whether or not he can take the conference bill. Substantively it doesn't really matter. He's not going to get enough money to build a wall across Texas, but he may need to go through courts to placate his base. I doubt anyone who might vote for Trump would decide not to just cause he kept stirring the pot.

Trump backs off attempt to rebrand his border wall plan: 'A WALL is a WALL!'

Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), another member of the conference committee and the Appropriations Homeland Security subcommittee, said he was surprised to see how determined his colleagues were to strike a deal and avert another government shutdown.

“I think all 17 of us, you know, really want to come to a conclusion on this. And so I think just, you know, all of our colleagues being very cordial and focused on getting this done, that was the message of the day,” he said in an interview on “New Day.”

He echoed Republican Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.), who the previous day boiled down border security priorities to three things: personnel, technology and barriers.

“I thought Sen. Hoeven actually got it right,” Aguilar said, though he was vague about whether he supported new barriers at the border.

Lawmakers have made clear that while they are looking to compromise on a border security package, their primary objective is avoiding another partial shutdown just three weeks after the longest shutdown ever came to a close.

 

[Papageorgio]

It'll depend on Coulter telling him whether or not he can take the conference bill. Substantively it doesn't really matter. He's not going to get enough money to build a wall across Texas, but he may need to go through courts to placate his base. I doubt anyone who might vote for Trump would decide not to just cause he kept stirring the pot.

Trump backs off attempt to rebrand his border wall plan: 'A WALL is a WALL!'

Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), another member of the conference committee and the Appropriations Homeland Security subcommittee, said he was surprised to see how determined his colleagues were to strike a deal and avert another government shutdown.

“I think all 17 of us, you know, really want to come to a conclusion on this. And so I think just, you know, all of our colleagues being very cordial and focused on getting this done, that was the message of the day,” he said in an interview on “New Day.”

He echoed Republican Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.), who the previous day boiled down border security priorities to three things: personnel, technology and barriers.

“I thought Sen. Hoeven actually got it right,” Aguilar said, though he was vague about whether he supported new barriers at the border.

Lawmakers have made clear that while they are looking to compromise on a border security package, their primary objective is avoiding another partial shutdown just three weeks after the longest shutdown ever came to a close.

Hope they can make it happen, however, I don't trust that Trump or Pelosi to concede anything.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

POLLS POLLS POLLS POLLS

Polls, polls, polls

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - 2018 Generic Congressional Vote

 

[The Original Tree]

The Wall is Coming, regardless, and The Democrat Party will again ***** like Hell that The American People are trying to ruin them by depriving them of access to more Brown Slaves to work in their plantations and sweat shops.

Shock poll: Americans want massive cuts to legal immigration

Americans support a border wall more than the media wants to believe

KERNS: The Polling Is Clear — Americans Want Border Security

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If you thought that the shutdown hurt Republicans politically, wait until Trump declares a phony national emergency to build his wall:

Voters disapprove 66 - 31 percent of the president using emergency powers to fund a wall along the border.

QU Poll Release Detail

These the same polls that said Trump couldn't win the presidency? Perhaps the same ones that said he should be impeached?

 

[GreenAndBlue]

If you thought that the shutdown hurt Republicans politically, wait until Trump declares a phony national emergency to build his wall:

Voters disapprove 66 - 31 percent of the president using emergency powers to fund a wall along the border.

QU Poll Release Detail

Explaining of polls are outrageously crooked in order to fool

Educators and the media and the democrats are intentionally not explaining polls

This is the explaining ::

The 18 yr old vote comes from less experience than the 60 yr old

The direction from liberal to more conservative proves conservatives is the best system because of the time to learn and proves conservatives as the most wise

The whole deep state covers up truth by not explaining


The polls wants people to think degrees proves more wise and covers up. Net worth is the real way to judge wisdom and not degrees

Trump has the most net worth supporters because of less worthless degrees and student debt and living in high cost cities

Outrageous crookedness with polls and the explanation of polls !!

 

[BS Filter]

That poll picked Hillary in a landslide. Very credible! Maybe they will pick Elizabeth Warren to be "Chief" of the Fukawi Tribe.

Nope, the polls said Hillary would win the popular vote by 2-3% and she did.

So? We don't elect Presidents by popular vote.

Wow, you're bright aren't you?

You made the claim that the polls picked Hillary in a landslide. They didn't. They showed she would win by 2-3% and she did. Your post was about disproving polls, you moron, you can't even remember what your point was from 2 seconds ago.

Once again, she didn't win, you lecherous jackal. The pollsters were all saying Hillary was our next President, you beady-eyed chameleon.

 

[HappyJoy]

That poll picked Hillary in a landslide. Very credible! Maybe they will pick Elizabeth Warren to be "Chief" of the Fukawi Tribe.

Nope, the polls said Hillary would win the popular vote by 2-3% and she did.

So? We don't elect Presidents by popular vote.

Wow, you're bright aren't you?

You made the claim that the polls picked Hillary in a landslide. They didn't. They showed she would win by 2-3% and she did. Your post was about disproving polls, you moron, you can't even remember what your point was from 2 seconds ago.

Once again, she didn't win, you lecherous jackal. The pollsters were all saying Hillary was our next President, you beady-eyed chameleon.

You're so tangled up. The national polls did nothing but say Hillary was going to win by 2-3% and she did just that.

Once again, you brought up this idiotic lie to attempt to discredit the poll in this thread and have failed because at this point you're not really making much of an argument.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

If you thought that the shutdown hurt Republicans politically, wait until Trump declares a phony national emergency to build his wall:

Voters disapprove 66 - 31 percent of the president using emergency powers to fund a wall along the border.

QU Poll Release Detail

I oppose it as well because of the precedent ot would set. Of course I do want a wall built but were I to be a participant in that poll that glaring fact wouldn't be shown.

Polls are trash

 

[whitehall]

The same Quinnepac that had Hillary up by a landslide around 50 to Trump 33 about 70 days before the election? That Quinnepac?

 

[B. Kidd]

That poll picked Hillary in a landslide. Very credible! Maybe they will pick Elizabeth Warren to be "Chief" of the Fukawi Tribe.

This...

 

[BS Filter]

That poll picked Hillary in a landslide. Very credible! Maybe they will pick Elizabeth Warren to be "Chief" of the Fukawi Tribe.

Nope, the polls said Hillary would win the popular vote by 2-3% and she did.

So? We don't elect Presidents by popular vote.

Wow, you're bright aren't you?

You made the claim that the polls picked Hillary in a landslide. They didn't. They showed she would win by 2-3% and she did. Your post was about disproving polls, you moron, you can't even remember what your point was from 2 seconds ago.

Once again, she didn't win, you lecherous jackal. The pollsters were all saying Hillary was our next President, you beady-eyed chameleon.

You're so tangled up. The national polls did nothing but say Hillary was going to win by 2-3% and she did just that.

Once again, you brought up this idiotic lie to attempt to discredit the poll in this thread and have failed because at this point you're not really making much of an argument.

What lie? Our President isn't elected by the popular vote. That's the truth.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Qunnipac is one of the very worst polls and so bias and tricky

 

[HappyJoy]

Nope, the polls said Hillary would win the popular vote by 2-3% and she did.

So? We don't elect Presidents by popular vote.

Wow, you're bright aren't you?

You made the claim that the polls picked Hillary in a landslide. They didn't. They showed she would win by 2-3% and she did. Your post was about disproving polls, you moron, you can't even remember what your point was from 2 seconds ago.

Once again, she didn't win, you lecherous jackal. The pollsters were all saying Hillary was our next President, you beady-eyed chameleon.

You're so tangled up. The national polls did nothing but say Hillary was going to win by 2-3% and she did just that.

Once again, you brought up this idiotic lie to attempt to discredit the poll in this thread and have failed because at this point you're not really making much of an argument.

What lie? Our President isn't elected by the popular vote. That's the truth.

Yep, and had nothing to do with your original point. You claimed the polls for the national popular vote were wrong to discredit the poll in this thread, well those polls that showed Clinton winning the popular vote were right. So, not sure what your point was but you clearly lost your train of thought.

BS filter? That's some funny shit

 

[HappyJoy]

Qunnipac is one of the very worst polls and so bias and tricky

Because they don't confirm your confirmation bias or do you actually have something to contrib.....nah, never mind.

 

[BS Filter]

So? We don't elect Presidents by popular vote.

Wow, you're bright aren't you?

You made the claim that the polls picked Hillary in a landslide. They didn't. They showed she would win by 2-3% and she did. Your post was about disproving polls, you moron, you can't even remember what your point was from 2 seconds ago.

Once again, she didn't win, you lecherous jackal. The pollsters were all saying Hillary was our next President, you beady-eyed chameleon.

You're so tangled up. The national polls did nothing but say Hillary was going to win by 2-3% and she did just that.

Once again, you brought up this idiotic lie to attempt to discredit the poll in this thread and have failed because at this point you're not really making much of an argument.

What lie? Our President isn't elected by the popular vote. That's the truth.

Yep, and had nothing to do with your original point. You claimed the polls for the national popular vote were wrong to discredit the poll in this thread, well those polls that showed Clinton winning the popular vote were right. So, not sure what your point was but you clearly lost your train of thought.

BS filter? That's some funny shit

Yes, they were wrong. Everyone was saying Hillary is our next President because she was up in the polls over Trump. You guys still haven't gotten over it. Next time don't count your chickens before they're hatched.

As for my handle, it fits perfectly.