Vote on What Verdict You Think Zimmerman Will Get Before its Given!

[JimBowie1958]

So many people think it is a shoe-in , but some think it will go opposite to their opponents claims. Some insist GZ will be acquitted and some insist he is guilty and will be convicted.

So why not put it up to a vote here?

 

[R.C. Christian]

I'm sorry, but isn't betting on this kind of thing a little bit lame?

 

[JimBowie1958]

I'm sorry, but isn't betting on this kind of thing a little bit lame?

I guess, but its a vote not a bet.

 

[R.C. Christian]

I'm sorry, but isn't betting on this kind of thing a little bit lame?

I guess, but its a vote not a bet.

Fair point.

 

[R.C. Christian]

I think they'll riot no matter what happens. Inner city minorities riot all the time when their teams succeed etc. I really want to see a riot though.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Good poll.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

I believe Zimmerman is guilty of manslaughter but it's doubtful he will get a guilty verdict.

 

[rightwinger]

No way a second degree murder conviction is warranted. If the Jury has an option of manslaughter, I think Zim would be convicted

 

[skookerasbil]

Well.....if we are at the point where we are no....... that the damn Supreme Court decisions can be rigged, anything is possible.

 

[Jackson]

Possibility of a hung jury. Then the state has to decide whether to go to trial again in light of the indictment of Angela Corey ( was that her name?).

 

[Ava]

I'm sorry, but isn't betting on this kind of thing a little bit lame?

Yes, for me it is. I am not going to even "guess" what 6 women-- 5 Caucasian and one Hispanic-- are going to conclude.

 

[Sallow]

No way a second degree murder conviction is warranted. If the Jury has an option of manslaughter, I think Zim would be convicted

I would go with Manslaughter as well.

 

[blastoff]

Great outcome if Zim is acquitted as he should be based on the trial to date, but we should not overlook the well-earned milestone it would also mark. For race pimp Al Sharpton this kick to his race baiting nuts would render him 0 - 3 in Big Games during his slimy career...Tawana Brawley, Duke lacrosse team, and the Zim.

And if he keeps racking 'em up like that it's just a matter of time until MSNBC moves him into prime time at night.

 

[kwc57]

I'm sorry, but isn't betting on this kind of thing a little bit lame?

Yes, for me it is. I am not going to even "guess" what 6 women-- 5 Caucasian and one Hispanic-- are going to conclude.

Being jury foreman for 6 women would be like herding cats.

 

[wavingrl]

No way a second degree murder conviction is warranted. If the Jury has an option of manslaughter, I think Zim would be convicted

I would go with Manslaughter as well.

It sounds like a manslaughter case.

I have some concerns about how the investigators handled the body and the evidence.

I could also understand acquittal or hung jury.

 

[JimBowie1958]

No way a second degree murder conviction is warranted. If the Jury has an option of manslaughter, I think Zim would be convicted

I would go with Manslaughter as well.

Yeah, anything to lynch GZ as a sacrifice to the gods of secularism and ideological insanity.

GZ is guilty of nothing except to defend himself, period.

 

[JimBowie1958]

No way a second degree murder conviction is warranted. If the Jury has an option of manslaughter, I think Zim would be convicted

I would go with Manslaughter as well.

It sounds like a manslaughter case.

I have some concerns about how the investigators handled the body and the evidence.

I could also understand acquittal or hung jury.

How does that work exactly?

Everyone has a right to defend themselves against charges made against them, right?

And this trial was a defense of GZ against prosecution for a specific crime.

How can you add new charges after the trial is over and NOT violate GZs right to a trial vrs charges against him?

 

[Pogo]

I had to vote "who is Zimmerman" for lack of a "who the **** cares" option...

 

[wavingrl]

I would go with Manslaughter as well.

It sounds like a manslaughter case.

I have some concerns about how the investigators handled the body and the evidence.

I could also understand acquittal or hung jury.

How does that work exactly?

Everyone has a right to defend themselves against charges made against them, right?

And this trial was a defense of GZ against prosecution for a specific crime.

How can you add new charges after the trial is over and NOT violate GZs right to a trial vrs charges against him?

I've changed my mind.

No new charges should be included.

 

[kwc57]

I had to vote "who is Zimmerman" for lack of a "who the **** cares" option...

Yet you voted and posted................