For what possible reason?Eventually, the Russians will give those back.
Really? Who told you that crap?Probably be a little embarrassed about the whole thing, too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For what possible reason?Eventually, the Russians will give those back.
Really? Who told you that crap?Probably be a little embarrassed about the whole thing, too.
For what possible reason?
Really? Who told you that crap?
Are you kidding? What type of "international pressure" can force the USA return Texas, California, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, Colorado and part of Wyoming to Mexico and then allow Latinoamerican Union to commit "decolonisation of Northern America"?International pressure.
No. You can't win WWIII, so, highly unlikely you'll even try to start it. Actually, you can't even afford the war of attrition.Germany can't stop apologizing for the shit they did in WW2. The Ukraine war is going to be like that for you guys.
Are you kidding? What type of "international pressure" can force the USA return Texas, California, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, Colorado and part of Wyoming to Mexico and then allow Latinoamerican Union to commit "decolonisation of Northern America"?
No. You can't win WWIII, so, highly unlikely you'll even try to start it. Actually, you can't even afford the war of attrition.
Not "centuries". Centuries (numerical) means, at least, two centuries. American-mexican war ended in 1848. Lesser than two centuries ago.Guy, that border was established centuries ago.
First of all - nobody cares (especially about American opinion). Second - we recognised those borders, but later we recognised independence of Crimea and Donbass republics. Third - we agreed to respect independence of the neutral Ukraine (with equal rights for Russians) when NATO agreed not to expand eastward. Both NATO and Ukraine have violated their parts of the deal - therefore, Russia doesn't have any moral obligations, too.Your miserable failure of a country signed treaties recognizing Ukraines borders.
Really? There never were any "Ukrainian nukes", as well as there is no "Montana's or Wyoming nukes". Soviet nuclear weapons always have been controlled by Moscow.Ukraine probably should have kept their nukes.
They will always be Ukranian.Actually, four of those oblasts are "former Ukrainian".
In your dreams only.They will always be Ukranian.
You are dreaming again.In your dreams only.
Don't count on it..Eventually, the Russians will give those back.
Not "centuries". Centuries (numerical) means, at least, two centuries. American-mexican war ended in 1848. Lesser than two centuries ago.
While Kiev became Russian city more than a thousand years ago.
First of all - nobody cares (especially about American opinion). Second - we recognised those borders, but later we recognised independence of Crimea and Donbass republics. Third - we agreed to respect independence of the neutral Ukraine (with equal rights for Russians) when NATO agreed not to expand eastward. Both NATO and Ukraine have violated their parts of the deal - therefore, Russia doesn't have any moral obligations, too.
Really? There never were any "Ukrainian nukes", as well as there is no "Montana's or Wyoming nukes". Soviet nuclear weapons always have been controlled by Moscow.
Of course no. You can't. And this is the main reason why the USA are talking about "peace" or "ceasefire". What is even more important - if your "shipments" became more or less sensitive - Russia is attacking the USA directly, if your shipments are not that dangerous - Russia attack the USA via proxies, too.Okay, if you don't care about our opinion, we should continue weapon shipments and sanctions until Putin is gone.
No. People of Crimea and Donbass declared independence. And they had pretty good reasons to do so.YOu invaded Crimea and Donbass.
Plain lie.Third, NATO never offered Ukraine a position.
Plain lie.Putin got upset when the ELECTED government of Ukraine sought closer economic ties with the EU, who were offering more than Day old Borscht.
Of course we could. By military means. Ukraine wasn't ready to fight for nukes they couldn't use, that's all.Except Moscow couldn't get them back to Russian Territory without agreements that the Russians are now violating.
"Volodymyr Zelenskyy: “I will never accept any decisions between the USA and Russia” About Peace in Ukraine
When the Russians are really scared - they usually shoot first.Russia is scared of America, always has been.
I wonder if Trump has considered contacting others in the Ukraine government and having then get rid of Zelensky installing someone better.
That sounds like something Biden or Obama would do.
... and always miss.When the Russians are really scared - they usually shoot first.
Well, he is only still in charge because he suspended elections due to the wartime that he is apparently refusing to try to end. Surely, they have some mechanism to impeach or replace tyrants or others which are doing great harm to the country.
I think Obama installed him. It's more of a dictatorship with suspended elections. Hopefully, Trump tells him to accept a peace settlement or go it alone.
I'm starting to think maybe Trump swings a deal with Putin that we go in there, take all of the minerals, shoot Zelensky, then let Russia take back all of Ukraine.
This shit is getting old.
