hjmick
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2007
- 29,376
- 14,965
- 1,415
I can't say that the decision of the Virginia Supreme Court, at least not based on what I understood of the law, and I'm no lawyer...
Virginia Court Strikes Down Order Allowing Felons to Vote
That last bolded part is the detail I thought would trip McAuliffe up. When I read it I interpreted it to mean that each individual request for clemency required a separate notification to the legislature.
Virginia Court Strikes Down Order Allowing Felons to Vote
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe's controversial order giving more than 200,000 convicted felons the right to vote was struck down late Friday by his state's supreme court.
The decision could have an impact on the presidential election in one of the nation's swing states. "The ruling gives Virginia Republicans a better shot at winning the state than they otherwise would have had," said Mark Murray, NBC News Senior Political Editor...
...the court said McAuliffe's order exceeded his powers under Virginia's constitution... the decision cannot be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court...
McAuliffe signed the order in April... He said it was intended to remove a Civil war-era restriction that was aimed at disenfranchising African-Americans.
His move was an end-run around the Republican-controlled legislature...
The court said the Virginia governor... has no power to issue such a blanket order.
The state constitution, the court said, requires the governor to notify the legislature each time clemency is granted, which it said was a further barrier to granting blanket forgiveness...
That last bolded part is the detail I thought would trip McAuliffe up. When I read it I interpreted it to mean that each individual request for clemency required a separate notification to the legislature.