This is outrageous behavior!
Vindman says he does not know the whistleblower’s identity, which conflicts with earlier testimony. More on this issue coming in subsequent stories. Adam Schiff stops Nunes from completing his question.
Nunes originally asked Vindman about whether he had shared the contents of the phone call between Trump and Ukraine President Zelensky with anyone outside the White House. In response Vindman stated “two people” and then named George Kent, and a person from the intelligence community. Then things get interesting. Vindman refuses to name the intelligence agency.
And Schiff (for brains) implicitly jumps in and confirmed that Vindman contacted the “whistleblower” by refusing to allow him to identify who he spoke to after the phone call.
Nunez played that well.
Very well. I'll translate for any dem incapable of understanding what just happened;
Vindman: 'I don't know who the whistleblower is.'
Nunes: 'Well, who was the other person you spoke to?'
Vindman: 'I can't answer that because it will reveal the whistleblower.'
.