Video: Man In A Red Car Is Attacked By Three Black People Armed With A Knife And Hammer – The Driver Serves Them Instant Justice

[bripat9643]

You'll love this video:


https://defiantamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/driver-hits-reverse.mp4

In DeSantis' Florida, the driver wouldn't even be charged. Screw this whiny scum.

I haven't read that the driver has been charged.

 

[bripat9643]

Oh, I see and who pays for the damage to the truck? The fact that the driver was free and clear of those attackers doesn't mean the driver can instigate retaliation and try to go back to the scene and cause damage without incurring liability for their actions which are deliberate.

.

The driver can most certainly be held liable for any property damages should the additional damaged vehicle not be the property of the assailant(s).
Free and clear would require assuming what was in front of the vehicle, and out of the camera's view at the point in time when the driver put the car in reverse.

.​

Considering we do not know the entire story gives us an unsure ending. But, the driver could say he was just trying to park the vehicle and didn't mean to hit them when his foot was stuck on the gas pedal.

It's unbelievable that you defend these murdering thugs.

 

[bripat9643]

I think legally he is in trouble because once he got free of them he stopped and attacked them. Hope they die.

How do you know he was totally free of them?

 

[Moonglow]

Oh, I see and who pays for the damage to the truck? The fact that the driver was free and clear of those attackers doesn't mean the driver can instigate retaliation and try to go back to the scene and cause damage without incurring liability for their actions which are deliberate.

.

The driver can most certainly be held liable for any property damages should the additional damaged vehicle not be the property of the assailant(s).
Free and clear would require assuming what was in front of the vehicle, and out of the camera's view at the point in time when the driver put the car in reverse.

.​

Considering we do not know the entire story gives us an unsure ending. But, the driver could say he was just trying to park the vehicle and didn't mean to hit them when his foot was stuck on the gas pedal.

It's unbelievable that you defend these murdering thugs.

It's terrible that you need to create an enemy because you like crime.

 

[Moonglow]

Oh, I see and who pays for the damage to the truck? The fact that the driver was free and clear of those attackers doesn't mean the driver can instigate retaliation and try to go back to the scene and cause damage without incurring liability for their actions which are deliberate.

.

The driver can most certainly be held liable for any property damages should the additional damaged vehicle not be the property of the assailant(s).
Free and clear would require assuming what was in front of the vehicle, and out of the camera's view at the point in time when the driver put the car in reverse.

.​

Considering we do not know the entire story gives us an unsure ending. But, the driver could say he was just trying to park the vehicle and didn't mean to hit them when his foot was stuck on the gas pedal.

It's unbelievable that you defend these murdering thugs.

Who did they murder? Again you are making shit up, what a douche

 

[bripat9643]

I don't know anyone in that video so I don't care...... shit's funny as hell.

All you whiners pretending to be upset at people being insensitive, or pretending to give a shit who pays for the fender bender, ya'll need to just stfu and get over yourselves already.

We live in a society that can't get over themselves. 'You can't tell me what to do!' is our motto. If you try, I'll hit you with my automobile is our rally cry. #extremistporn

If you're holding a weapon and telling me shit, then yeah, there's a good chance I'm going to **** you up.


Who ******* cares, anyway?

Can't we just laugh at a funny video?

Sure. Go crazy.

BEAUTIFUL!

 

[bripat9643]

Oh, I see and who pays for the damage to the truck? The fact that the driver was free and clear of those attackers doesn't mean the driver can instigate retaliation and try to go back to the scene and cause damage without incurring liability for their actions which are deliberate.

.

The driver can most certainly be held liable for any property damages should the additional damaged vehicle not be the property of the assailant(s).
Free and clear would require assuming what was in front of the vehicle, and out of the camera's view at the point in time when the driver put the car in reverse.

.​

Considering we do not know the entire story gives us an unsure ending. But, the driver could say he was just trying to park the vehicle and didn't mean to hit them when his foot was stuck on the gas pedal.

It's unbelievable that you defend these murdering thugs.

It's terrible that you need to create an enemy because you like crime.

I didn't create these assholes. People like you did.

 

[Moonglow]

You'll love this video:


https://defiantamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/driver-hits-reverse.mp4

In DeSantis' Florida, the driver wouldn't even be charged. Screw this whiny scum.

I haven't read that the driver has been charged.

There was nothing to read in the OP, again with the fantasy island gig.

 

[Moonglow]

Oh, I see and who pays for the damage to the truck? The fact that the driver was free and clear of those attackers doesn't mean the driver can instigate retaliation and try to go back to the scene and cause damage without incurring liability for their actions which are deliberate.

.

The driver can most certainly be held liable for any property damages should the additional damaged vehicle not be the property of the assailant(s).
Free and clear would require assuming what was in front of the vehicle, and out of the camera's view at the point in time when the driver put the car in reverse.

.​

Considering we do not know the entire story gives us an unsure ending. But, the driver could say he was just trying to park the vehicle and didn't mean to hit them when his foot was stuck on the gas pedal.

It's unbelievable that you defend these murdering thugs.

It's terrible that you need to create an enemy because you like crime.

I didn't create these assholes. People like you did.

They are not my kids, 4 lies in row, my you are good.

 

[bripat9643]

Oh, I see and who pays for the damage to the truck? The fact that the driver was free and clear of those attackers doesn't mean the driver can instigate retaliation and try to go back to the scene and cause damage without incurring liability for their actions which are deliberate.

.

The driver can most certainly be held liable for any property damages should the additional damaged vehicle not be the property of the assailant(s).
Free and clear would require assuming what was in front of the vehicle, and out of the camera's view at the point in time when the driver put the car in reverse.

.​

Considering we do not know the entire story gives us an unsure ending. But, the driver could say he was just trying to park the vehicle and didn't mean to hit them when his foot was stuck on the gas pedal.

It's unbelievable that you defend these murdering thugs.

Who did they murder? Again you are making shit up, what a douche

They assaulted the guy in the car with deadly weapons, numskull. He was justified in assuming that his life was at stake.

 

[bripat9643]

You'll love this video:


https://defiantamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/driver-hits-reverse.mp4

In DeSantis' Florida, the driver wouldn't even be charged. Screw this whiny scum.

I haven't read that the driver has been charged.

There was nothing to read in the OP, again with the fantasy island gig.

Precisely!

 

[bripat9643]

Oh, I see and who pays for the damage to the truck? The fact that the driver was free and clear of those attackers doesn't mean the driver can instigate retaliation and try to go back to the scene and cause damage without incurring liability for their actions which are deliberate.

.

The driver can most certainly be held liable for any property damages should the additional damaged vehicle not be the property of the assailant(s).
Free and clear would require assuming what was in front of the vehicle, and out of the camera's view at the point in time when the driver put the car in reverse.

.​

Considering we do not know the entire story gives us an unsure ending. But, the driver could say he was just trying to park the vehicle and didn't mean to hit them when his foot was stuck on the gas pedal.

It's unbelievable that you defend these murdering thugs.

It's terrible that you need to create an enemy because you like crime.

I didn't create these assholes. People like you did.

They are not my kids, 4 lies in row, my you are good.

Lefties like you provided the justification for these thugs to believe they could do whatever they wanted.

 

[Moonglow]

Oh, I see and who pays for the damage to the truck? The fact that the driver was free and clear of those attackers doesn't mean the driver can instigate retaliation and try to go back to the scene and cause damage without incurring liability for their actions which are deliberate.

.

The driver can most certainly be held liable for any property damages should the additional damaged vehicle not be the property of the assailant(s).
Free and clear would require assuming what was in front of the vehicle, and out of the camera's view at the point in time when the driver put the car in reverse.

.​

Considering we do not know the entire story gives us an unsure ending. But, the driver could say he was just trying to park the vehicle and didn't mean to hit them when his foot was stuck on the gas pedal.

It's unbelievable that you defend these murdering thugs.

Who did they murder? Again you are making shit up, what a douche

They assaulted the guy in the car with deadly weapons, numskull. He was justified in assuming that his life was at stake.

I am sure he did but "d " is for drive away not drive into.

 

[Moonglow]

Oh, I see and who pays for the damage to the truck? The fact that the driver was free and clear of those attackers doesn't mean the driver can instigate retaliation and try to go back to the scene and cause damage without incurring liability for their actions which are deliberate.

.

The driver can most certainly be held liable for any property damages should the additional damaged vehicle not be the property of the assailant(s).
Free and clear would require assuming what was in front of the vehicle, and out of the camera's view at the point in time when the driver put the car in reverse.

.​

Considering we do not know the entire story gives us an unsure ending. But, the driver could say he was just trying to park the vehicle and didn't mean to hit them when his foot was stuck on the gas pedal.

It's unbelievable that you defend these murdering thugs.

It's terrible that you need to create an enemy because you like crime.

I didn't create these assholes. People like you did.

They are not my kids, 4 lies in row, my you are good.

Lefties like you provided the justification for these thugs to believe they could do whatever they wanted.

I am sure you can't prove the sixth lie from you so far.

 

[bripat9643]

You'll love this video:


https://defiantamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/driver-hits-reverse.mp4

Who doesnt love seeing raging goblins getting what they deserve.

I bookmarked it so I can watch it over and over

Good idea

 

[bripat9643]

Oh, I see and who pays for the damage to the truck? The fact that the driver was free and clear of those attackers doesn't mean the driver can instigate retaliation and try to go back to the scene and cause damage without incurring liability for their actions which are deliberate.

.

The driver can most certainly be held liable for any property damages should the additional damaged vehicle not be the property of the assailant(s).
Free and clear would require assuming what was in front of the vehicle, and out of the camera's view at the point in time when the driver put the car in reverse.

.​

Considering we do not know the entire story gives us an unsure ending. But, the driver could say he was just trying to park the vehicle and didn't mean to hit them when his foot was stuck on the gas pedal.

It's unbelievable that you defend these murdering thugs.

Who did they murder? Again you are making shit up, what a douche

They assaulted the guy in the car with deadly weapons, numskull. He was justified in assuming that his life was at stake.

I am sure he did but "d " is for drive away not drive into.

"R" is for "teach thugs a good lesson."

 

[bripat9643]

Oh, I see and who pays for the damage to the truck? The fact that the driver was free and clear of those attackers doesn't mean the driver can instigate retaliation and try to go back to the scene and cause damage without incurring liability for their actions which are deliberate.

.

The driver can most certainly be held liable for any property damages should the additional damaged vehicle not be the property of the assailant(s).
Free and clear would require assuming what was in front of the vehicle, and out of the camera's view at the point in time when the driver put the car in reverse.

.​

Considering we do not know the entire story gives us an unsure ending. But, the driver could say he was just trying to park the vehicle and didn't mean to hit them when his foot was stuck on the gas pedal.

It's unbelievable that you defend these murdering thugs.

Who did they murder? Again you are making shit up, what a douche

They tried to murder the driver, dumbass.

 

[Nostra]

If you are a sadist, yes.

Being a thug has some occupational hazards.

"If you can't to the time, don't do the crime"-Baretta.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Is that a fact? Since you know me so well darlin', why not enlighten the class?

.

Sorry Sweetie ... But I am not licensed to practice in your country of residence, nor I am a beneficiary of the protections that would provide.

For all I know, you would hang yourself if I were to disclose a more in depth analysis, and your family could try to pin that shit on me.
I have to respectfully decline, and in your current condition, with your current knowledge, do not see you as a threat to yourself or others.
Therefore ... I am not obligated morally nor ethically, to inform you, nor the authorities of your condition.

.​

Awesome! How about shutting the **** up, then?

 

[BlackSand]

Awesome! How about shutting the **** up, then?

.

You're free to shut the **** up if you feel like it ... I didn't ask you for anything ...

.​