Victims of Communism

[Skull]

Are you saying that that China kills more people than the US?

By far - study the Black Book of Communism.
[/QUOTE]

That's not an answer to my post.
[/QUOTE]

 

[Skull]

Are you saying that that China kills more people than the US?

By far - study the Black Book of Communism.

That's not an answer to my post.

The answer to more deaths by Communist parties' rule is in the Black Book. Also consult Paul Kengor's Guide to Communism, where numbers are given.

 

[GLASNOST]

I have more knowledge understanding and insight than you.

Then why do you respond with the ignorance of a child?

You are brainwashed with rhetoric I state facts

You mean like, "Communist nations are the bloodiest of all governments". right?

I know from where you glean your "facts"
View attachment 476397

I do not
It is you responding with ignorance based posts and projecting.
It is a historic fact,

My guess is that you are between the age of 13 and 18. Am I right?

Your ability to guess is as lame as your comrehension of poligtics. Notice how you had to get personal before going anywhere else. You lack any intelligent argument.

Lack of knowledge coupled with a yearning to participate in discussions/debates on subjects you know very little about can be frustrating, particularly now that your irrelevant mis/disinformation is being challenged. Your comment, "Communist nations are the bloodiest of all governments" is too silly to be taken seriously enough without the need to get personal. Your comment is childish and unsubstantiated and has no relevance.

 

[GLASNOST]

Are you saying that that China kills more people than the US?

By far - study the Black Book of Communism.

That's not an answer to my post.

The answer to more deaths by Communist parties' rule is in the Black Book. Also consult Paul Kengor's Guide to Communism, where numbers are given.

How many people did Cuba kill last year compared to the US? North Korea? Transdienister? Vietnam? Laos? China? What about the year before that? And the one before that? What is your parameter? Would you rather compare NATO with the combined Communist nations of Cuba, North Korea, Transdienister, Vietnam, Laos, and China? You are out on a limb.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Red menace is still not entirely on the ash heap of history, so here are some reminders of past and present victims of that totalitarian horror.

http://victimsofcommunism.org

I'm not going to defend "Communism". I'm going to attack ignorance about what Communism is.

Communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Communism

" Communism (from Latin communis, 'common, universal')[1][2] is a philosophical, social, political, and economic ideology and movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of a communist society, namely a socioeconomic order structured upon the ideas of common ownership of the means of production and the absence of social classes, money,[3][4] and the state.[5][6] As such, communism is a specific form of socialism. "

The biggest problem I have with countries that people say are, or were, Communist countries is they had a strong leadership. This strong leadership had no intention of giving up power.

Most of these countries have socialist elements, though take China, it's healthcare system is far less socialist than the UK's NHS, for example.

So I'm going to say there never has been a Communist country.

Then again we could also see how much capitalist countries have killed. Quite a lot too.

Yoiur definition proves there has been many communist nations and still are.

Communism is not and has never been the final egalitarian stateless society it is and has always been a country following the ideology to achieve such an evil society.

No dictator ever wants to give up power which is simple proof of the absolute stupidity of the scumbag Karl Marx.

Communist nations are the bloodiest of all governments and communism is an evil philosophy atyy the core as described by Marx

No, it doesn't.

The problem with the definition gave is that it makes the assumption that they're working towards a full Communist society.

Which country every fulfilled that?

And I wouldn't blame Marx for this. Marx put his ideas down on paper, others picked up these ideas and took them somewhere.

Are these supposed "Communist nations" the bloodiest? Really?

Are you saying that that China kills more people than the US?

Working toward it and fiulfilling it are two diffferent things. So long as they are qworking toward it they fit the definition even if it is never fulfilled therefore they asre communist and yes your own definition proves it,

Yes they are the bloodiest and yes the communist chinese killed more than the US ever did.

Marx is to blame as he wrote the ideas which are by definition evil.

And how do you know they're "working towards it"?

If you have a strong government that is unwilling to give power to the people, ever, how can they be working towards it?

Since 1948, when China officially became "Communist", the US has been involved in so many military operations around the world, it's incredible.

Because they say they are. No other evidence is needed.

Communism has nothing whatsoever with giving power to the people it is strictly about tyranny and dictatorship until the moment that the state whithers away and dies.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Are these supposed "Communist nations" the bloodiest? Really?

Are you saying that that China kills more people than the US?

By far - study the Black Book of Communism.

That's not an answer to my post.

It details the answer

 

[Soupnazi630]

I have more knowledge understanding and insight than you.

Then why do you respond with the ignorance of a child?

You are brainwashed with rhetoric I state facts

You mean like, "Communist nations are the bloodiest of all governments". right?

I know from where you glean your "facts"
View attachment 476397

I do not
It is you responding with ignorance based posts and projecting.
It is a historic fact,

My guess is that you are between the age of 13 and 18. Am I right?

Your ability to guess is as lame as your comrehension of poligtics. Notice how you had to get personal before going anywhere else. You lack any intelligent argument.

Lack of knowledge coupled with a yearning to participate in discussions/debates on subjects you know very little about can be frustrating, particularly now that your irrelevant mis/disinformation is being challenged. Your comment, "Communist nations are the bloodiest of all governments" is too silly to be taken seriously enough without the need to get personal. Your comment is childish and unsubstantiated and has no relevance.

I know more about these subjects than you do,

That statement is historically accurater and you cannot refute it with evidence.

It ios substatiated with documented fact and is relevant

You have no counter argument and lack any intelligence to argue the fact. Hence you have nothing more than childish pronouncements of fallacy.

 

[GLASNOST]

I know more about these subjects than you do,
That statement is historically accurater and you cannot refute it with evidence.
It ios substatiated with documented fact and is relevant
You have no counter argument and lack any intelligence to argue the fact. Hence you have nothing more than childish pronouncements of fallacy.
Communism has nothing whatsoever with giving power to the people it is strictly about tyranny snd dictatorship until the moment that the state whithers away and dies.

Where do you people get these silly ideas from if not from children's books?

 

[Soupnazi630]

I know more about these subjects than you do,
That statement is historically accurater and you cannot refute it with evidence.
It ios substatiated with documented fact and is relevant
You have no counter argument and lack any intelligence to argue the fact. Hence you have nothing more than childish pronouncements of fallacy.
Communism has nothing whatsoever with giving power to the people it is strictly about tyranny snd dictatorship until the moment that the state whithers away and dies.

Where do you people get these silly ideas from if not from children's books?

Marx did not write chidlrens books and I stated precisely what he descibed.

 

[GLASNOST]

Where do you people get these silly ideas from if not from children's books?

Marx did not write childrens books and I stated precisely what he descibed.

That's true, Marx did not write children's books. So it must be your adolescent interpretation/description of his books that's your problem .... assuming you've read them.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Where do you people get these silly ideas from if not from children's books?

Marx did not write childrens books and I stated precisely what he descibed.

That's true, Marx did not write children's books. So it must be your adolescent interpretation/description of his books that's your problem .... assuming you've read them.

It was not interpretation it is what he said and clearly you are massively ignorant of the 19th century scum bag.

You are an immature and uneducsted brat who knows nothing of this subject bnow run along and read something BOY

 

[GLASNOST]

Where do you people get these silly ideas from if not from children's books?

Marx did not write childrens books and I stated precisely what he descibed.

That's true, Marx did not write children's books. So it must be your adolescent interpretation/description of his books that's your problem .... assuming you've read them.

It was not interpretation it is what he said and clearly you are massively ignorant of the 19th century scum bag.

You are an immature and uneducsted brat who knows nothing of this subject bnow run along and read something BOY

Go to bed now, you silly child, and dream of all the wonderful things you'll do when you grow up.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Where do you people get these silly ideas from if not from children's books?

Marx did not write childrens books and I stated precisely what he descibed.

That's true, Marx did not write children's books. So it must be your adolescent interpretation/description of his books that's your problem .... assuming you've read them.

It was not interpretation it is what he said and clearly you are massively ignorant of the 19th century scum bag.

You are an immature and uneducsted brat who knows nothing of this subject bnow run along and read something BOY

Go to bed now, you silly child, and dream of all the wonderful things you'll do when you grow up.

Still no intelligent response.

Facts sting you bad boy

 

[GLASNOST]

Where do you people get these silly ideas from if not from children's books?

Marx did not write childrens books and I stated precisely what he descibed.

That's true, Marx did not write children's books. So it must be your adolescent interpretation/description of his books that's your problem .... assuming you've read them.

It was not interpretation it is what he said and clearly you are massively ignorant of the 19th century scum bag.

You are an immature and uneducsted brat who knows nothing of this subject bnow run along and read something BOY

Go to bed now, you silly child, and dream of all the wonderful things you'll do when you grow up.

Still no intelligent response.

Facts sting you bad boy

 

[Soupnazi630]

Where do you people get these silly ideas from if not from children's books?

Marx did not write childrens books and I stated precisely what he descibed.

That's true, Marx did not write children's books. So it must be your adolescent interpretation/description of his books that's your problem .... assuming you've read them.

It was not interpretation it is what he said and clearly you are massively ignorant of the 19th century scum bag.

You are an immature and uneducsted brat who knows nothing of this subject bnow run along and read something BOY

Go to bed now, you silly child, and dream of all the wonderful things you'll do when you grow up.

Still no intelligent response.

Facts sting you bad boy

View attachment 476685

Cute but still no informed argument from you.

 

[GLASNOST]

Where do you people get these silly ideas from if not from children's books?

Marx did not write childrens books and I stated precisely what he descibed.

That's true, Marx did not write children's books. So it must be your adolescent interpretation/description of his books that's your problem .... assuming you've read them.

It was not interpretation it is what he said and clearly you are massively ignorant of the 19th century scum bag.

You are an immature and uneducsted brat who knows nothing of this subject bnow run along and read something BOY

Go to bed now, you silly child, and dream of all the wonderful things you'll do when you grow up.

Still no intelligent response.

Facts sting you bad boy

View attachment 476685

Cute but still no informed argument from you.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Are you saying that that China kills more people than the US?

By far - study the Black Book of Communism.

That's not an answer to my post.

The answer to more deaths by Communist parties' rule is in the Black Book. Also consult Paul Kengor's Guide to Communism, where numbers are given.

Great conversation.... not

 

[frigidweirdo]

The Red menace is still not entirely on the ash heap of history, so here are some reminders of past and present victims of that totalitarian horror.

http://victimsofcommunism.org

I'm not going to defend "Communism". I'm going to attack ignorance about what Communism is.

Communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Communism

" Communism (from Latin communis, 'common, universal')[1][2] is a philosophical, social, political, and economic ideology and movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of a communist society, namely a socioeconomic order structured upon the ideas of common ownership of the means of production and the absence of social classes, money,[3][4] and the state.[5][6] As such, communism is a specific form of socialism. "

The biggest problem I have with countries that people say are, or were, Communist countries is they had a strong leadership. This strong leadership had no intention of giving up power.

Most of these countries have socialist elements, though take China, it's healthcare system is far less socialist than the UK's NHS, for example.

So I'm going to say there never has been a Communist country.

Then again we could also see how much capitalist countries have killed. Quite a lot too.

Yoiur definition proves there has been many communist nations and still are.

Communism is not and has never been the final egalitarian stateless society it is and has always been a country following the ideology to achieve such an evil society.

No dictator ever wants to give up power which is simple proof of the absolute stupidity of the scumbag Karl Marx.

Communist nations are the bloodiest of all governments and communism is an evil philosophy atyy the core as described by Marx

No, it doesn't.

The problem with the definition gave is that it makes the assumption that they're working towards a full Communist society.

Which country every fulfilled that?

And I wouldn't blame Marx for this. Marx put his ideas down on paper, others picked up these ideas and took them somewhere.

Are these supposed "Communist nations" the bloodiest? Really?

Are you saying that that China kills more people than the US?

Working toward it and fiulfilling it are two diffferent things. So long as they are qworking toward it they fit the definition even if it is never fulfilled therefore they asre communist and yes your own definition proves it,

Yes they are the bloodiest and yes the communist chinese killed more than the US ever did.

Marx is to blame as he wrote the ideas which are by definition evil.

And how do you know they're "working towards it"?

If you have a strong government that is unwilling to give power to the people, ever, how can they be working towards it?

Since 1948, when China officially became "Communist", the US has been involved in so many military operations around the world, it's incredible.

Because they say they are. No other evidence is needed.

Communism has nothing whatsoever with giving power to the people it is strictly about tyranny and dictatorship until the moment that the state whithers away and dies.

Right, North Korea says it's democratic. Is it?

 

[GLASNOST]

Right, North Korea says it's democratic. Is it?

Gosh! Golly! Gee whiz! Yes, it MUST be! After all, the name of the country is "The Democratic People's Republic of Korea"

 

[Soupnazi630]

Where do you people get these silly ideas from if not from children's books?

Marx did not write childrens books and I stated precisely what he descibed.

That's true, Marx did not write children's books. So it must be your adolescent interpretation/description of his books that's your problem .... assuming you've read them.

It was not interpretation it is what he said and clearly you are massively ignorant of the 19th century scum bag.

You are an immature and uneducsted brat who knows nothing of this subject bnow run along and read something BOY

Go to bed now, you silly child, and dream of all the wonderful things you'll do when you grow up.

Still no intelligent response.

Facts sting you bad boy

View attachment 476685

Cute but still no informed argument from you.

View attachment 476691

It is relevant and based on fact.

Sorry you lack the intelligence to refute it