So you cannot refute the evidence. Or even the statements. Not a problem.
We have many times and you know it you just want to continue to deny this as always.
Just because you don't agree with alternative views from credible sources that we post, does not make them wrong.
I will not accept the theories and guesses you believe because frankly they have not been proven to be infallible. Whether one wants to say the government is lying or mistaken it doesn't change the fact they are supplying only theories and guesses, that have been scientifically and reputably refuted.
You should not generalize truthers and lump us all in together. There are parts to the OCT that are more hotly contested then others, by different people, just like not all military veterans adhering to the OCT does not make them all truthers.
There are many instances about the OCT narrative and theory that are disputed. Again there is no solid proof of the theory you believe in or my theory I believe in, the only sure thing is that those that don't believe as you do have made good cases, specifically with respect to the NIST report and the 9-11 commission which is what we were specifically talking about, how about sicking to that for now instead of trying to change the topics?
You insist that there were explosives planted, yet can present no evidence that says there was.
You insist there was nothing other then fires and planes that caused the collapses, yet there is no evidence solid enough to support this, especially since there wasn't even a proper investigation into these claims that there might have been, even after Scientists Discovered Both Residues And Unignited Fragments Of Nano-Engineered Thermitic Pyrotechnics in Debris From the Twin Towers.
These are pretty strong claims that NIST doesn't respond to.
Explosive Residues: Energetic Materials and the World Trade Center Destruction
Again the NIST report is only a theory, and the 9-11 commission report is not entirely accurate, as admitted to by its panelists.
Is NIST guessing? Yes. So why do you not like admitting this?
So tell us again how a building
fell on WTC 7?
The supposed nano thermite find is pure BS. Just had to let you know that.
Please answer this, because I have asked it many times and never received an answer. What part of the 911 CR that the panel put their name on do they now disagree with?
We don't know they aren't exactly saying, we have to go by these statements.
Thomas Kean, was the Republican governor of New Jersey. He had the following to say... “We to this day don’t know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us, it
was just so far from the truth. . . "
Farmer states...“at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened...
What do these statements mean to you? Does it inspire confidence in them getting accurate information, does it inspire confidence everything could have been correct? They both allude to dishonesty, do they not?
It seems that the panelist agreeing with the report and the panel speaking out like they did in the above statements is double speak.
Bob Kerrey, another member of the federal 9/11 Commission, added, “It might take “a permanent 9/11 commission” to end the remaining mysteries of September 11 and called for “a permanent 9/11 Commission.--Newsweek
"Well, let me just say that I think the report is, uh, extremely accurate, and- and sets forth the facts of 9/11."-Farmer
So he writes a book suggesting that different levels of government gave them false information, and were dishonest, but when pressed to elaborate he says the above statement...
Looks like members of the truth movement aren't the only ones making money by selling books.
Farmer is not saying that 9-11 was an inside job, however, FarmerÂ’s testimony, along with that of his fellow 9-11 Commission members, demonstrates that, whatever really happened on 9-11, may not be accurate. He is talking about some of the details provided after the attacks by NORAD and the FAA, for example that NORAD knew about Flight 93 before it crashed, and the governments reaction to warnings etc.. Bottom line is that many people still don't believe the OCT.
'We should never be seen as answering all the questions"-
Bob Kerry at about 3:30 into the video
It's a 30 year old conspiracy" he goes on to say, at 6:47
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtJWBcWAeAw&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - ‪9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey finally confesses 9-11 Commission could not do it's job - Part 3 of 3‬‏[/ame]
Now can you tell us how a building fell on WTC 7?
