Very warm year so far

[Si modo]

Poor ol' Si. Cannot answer with reality, ....

Answer what?

All I see is your idiocy in providing preliminary results based on measurements with inconsistency of methodology, as God's word.

Believe as you will. Your faith is irrelevant to science.

 

[Old Rocks]

Can you explain why you cannot find any real scientists to back your positon? How about presenting some peer reviewed articles that show us that AGW is not real. Or some evidence from a reputable source that shows us the ice in the glaciers and ice caps is not melting.

 

[Old Rocks]

Poor ol' Si. Cannot answer with reality, ....

Answer what?

All I see is your idiocy in providing preliminary results based on measurements with inconsistency of methodology, as God's word.

Believe as you will. Your faith is irrelevant to science.

And your uninformed political opinion is not only irrelevant to science, it is antithetical to it.

 

[Si modo]

Poor ol' Si. Cannot answer with reality, ....

Answer what?

All I see is your idiocy in providing preliminary results based on measurements with inconsistency of methodology, as God's word.

Believe as you will. Your faith is irrelevant to science.

And your uninformed political opinion is not only irrelevant to science, it is antithetical to it.

Damn, I feel like Jay Leno doing a clip for Jaywalking.

You pick preliminary data for a year not even over, say it may surpass another year in overall temperature, then proclaim global cooling is gone.

And you want some kind of 'answer' to THAT?

OK. You're a moron for even thinking you present anything resembling scientific or even critical thought. Stop playing at science; it's cringeworthy.

What the fuck are you smoking?

 

[Si modo]

Can you explain why you cannot find any real scientists to back your positon? How about presenting some peer reviewed articles that show us that AGW is not real. Or some evidence from a reputable source that shows us the ice in the glaciers and ice caps is not melting.

The funny thing is, YOU'LL be hard pressed to find any scientists to back up your OP.

Preliminary data for a year not even over that MAY surpass 1998 and you conclude global cooling is gone.

 

[Old Rocks]

Present data that shows that the data presented is not correct. And when the first third of the year is the warmest recorded, the preliminery data showing that the increase is great enough that inevitible minor corrections will not affect that fact, then one can safely say that there is a good chance that this will be a record year for warmth.

Of course, someone like yourself might claim the opposite. Not bothering to cite even one reputable source while doing so. SOP for you politically driven people

 

[gslack]

Can you explain why you cannot find any real scientists to back your positon? How about presenting some peer reviewed articles that show us that AGW is not real. Or some evidence from a reputable source that shows us the ice in the glaciers and ice caps is not melting.

Pay attention! we don't have to, your sources tell on themselves.... you just read it with your global warming goggles on.... You really need to start paying attention...

 

[del]

Poor ol' Si. Cannot answer with reality, ....

Answer what?

All I see is your idiocy in providing preliminary results based on measurements with inconsistency of methodology, as God's word.

Believe as you will. Your faith is irrelevant to science.

you mean like this?

In the 1970s, nearly 600 Canadian weather stations fed surface temperature readings into a global database assembled by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Today, NOAA only collects data from 35 stations across Canada.

Worse, only one station -- at Eureka on Ellesmere Island -- is now used by NOAA as a temperature gauge for all Canadian territory above the Arctic Circle

The Canadian government, meanwhile, operates 1,400 surface weather stations across the country, and more than 100 above the Arctic Circle, according to Environment Canada.

Yet as American researchers Joseph D'Aleo, a meteorologist, and E. Michael Smith, a computer programmer, point out in a study published on the website of the Science and Public Policy Institute, NOAA uses "just one thermometer [for measuring] everything north of latitude 65 degrees."

Read more: Scientists using selective temperature data, skeptics say

i'm sure that these aren't real scientists because, after all, old rocks says so.

GMAFB

 

[Si modo]

Present data that shows that the data presented is not correct. And when the first third of the year is the warmest recorded, the preliminery data showing that the increase is great enough that inevitible minor corrections will not affect that fact, then one can safely say that there is a good chance that this will be a record year for warmth.

Of course, someone like yourself might claim the opposite. Not bothering to cite even one reputable source while doing so. SOP for you politically driven people

WTF are you talking about?

OMG, he is in the Twighlight Zone.

 

[Old Rocks]

OK, old gal, show your evidence for global cooling. Show us how 2000 thru 2009 was cooler than 1990 thru 1999. Show us why it has been cooling since 1998, yet 2005 almost eclipsed, or did eclipse, 1998, depending on whose figures you read.

What a silly dingleberry you are, continually throwing out statements that are total nonsense, and then failing to back any of them.

NASA - NASA Research Finds Last Decade was Warmest on Record, 2009 One of Warmest Years

RELEASE : 10-017 NASA Research Finds Last Decade was Warmest on Record, 2009 One of Warmest Years WASHINGTON -- A new analysis of global surface temperatures by NASA scientists finds the past year was tied for the second warmest since 1880. In the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the warmest year on record.

Although 2008 was the coolest year of the decade because of a strong La Nina that cooled the tropical Pacific Ocean, 2009 saw a return to a near-record global temperatures as the La Nina diminished, according to the new analysis by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. The past year was a small fraction of a degree cooler than 2005, the warmest on record, putting 2009 in a virtual tie with a cluster of other years --1998, 2002, 2003, 2006, and 2007 -- for the second warmest on record.

"There's always interest in the annual temperature numbers and a given year's ranking, but the ranking often misses the point," said James Hansen, GISS director. "There's substantial year-to-year variability of global temperature caused by the tropical El Nino-La Nina cycle. When we average temperature over five or ten years to minimize that variability, we find global warming is continuing unabated."

 

[Old Rocks]

Poor ol' Si. Cannot answer with reality, ....

Answer what?

All I see is your idiocy in providing preliminary results based on measurements with inconsistency of methodology, as God's word.

Believe as you will. Your faith is irrelevant to science.

you mean like this?

In the 1970s, nearly 600 Canadian weather stations fed surface temperature readings into a global database assembled by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Today, NOAA only collects data from 35 stations across Canada.

Worse, only one station -- at Eureka on Ellesmere Island -- is now used by NOAA as a temperature gauge for all Canadian territory above the Arctic Circle

The Canadian government, meanwhile, operates 1,400 surface weather stations across the country, and more than 100 above the Arctic Circle, according to Environment Canada.

Yet as American researchers Joseph D'Aleo, a meteorologist, and E. Michael Smith, a computer programmer, point out in a study published on the website of the Science and Public Policy Institute, NOAA uses "just one thermometer [for measuring] everything north of latitude 65 degrees."

Read more: Scientists using selective temperature data, skeptics say

i'm sure that these aren't real scientists because, after all, old rocks says so.

GMAFB

Ever here of satellites?

 

[Old Rocks]

Present data that shows that the data presented is not correct. And when the first third of the year is the warmest recorded, the preliminery data showing that the increase is great enough that inevitible minor corrections will not affect that fact, then one can safely say that there is a good chance that this will be a record year for warmth.

Of course, someone like yourself might claim the opposite. Not bothering to cite even one reputable source while doing so. SOP for you politically driven people

WTF are you talking about?

OMG, he is in the Twighlight Zone.

Yap-yap from a yapper. Not a single source to back up the poltically driven nonsense.

 

[Old Rocks]

Please move the cursor to the altitude scale along the left side and click the graphic to view the global atmospheric temperature trend for the selected layer in the atmosphere, or choose a layer in the atmosphere from the pulldown menu at the bottom left. You may also view the current global Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU) satellite image at many different layers of the atmosphere

AMSU-A Temperatures

 

[Si modo]

OK, old gal, show your evidence for global cooling. ....

First, you show me where I said there IS global cooling.

Damn, when you cannot even comprehend simple English and show no evidence of any logic whatsoever, ...

what ...

the ...

fuck?

 

[gslack]

olsocks has resorted to trying to get the last word in with his globla warming sock army...

Wonderful, lets see who ends up with the last word then.... Forget truth forget evidence forget all of the important things.... just get the last word in so you can trick people.... Nice way to admit the ethics in your argument .... LOL

 

[konradv]

Forget truth forget evidence forget all of the important things.... just get the last word in so you can trick people
---------------------------------

Sounds like your mantra!!!

 

[Big Fitz]

Looks like 2010 has the potential to exceed 1998. So much for global cooling.

NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - NOAA: NOAA: Warmest April Global Temperature on Record

NOAA: Warmest April Global Temperature on Record
Also Warmest January-April
May 17, 2010

The combined global land and ocean surface temperature was the warmest on record for both April and for the period from January-April, according to NOAA. Additionally, last month’s average ocean surface temperature was the warmest on record for any April, and the global land surface temperature was the third warmest on record.

The monthly analysis from NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center, which is based on records going back to 1880, is part of the suite of climate services that NOAA provides government, business and community leaders so they can make informed decisions.

Crocks... you're a fear mongering lunatic.

 

[Old Rocks]

Hmmm........ But not a single source to refute what NOAA states?

 

[Si modo]

Hmmm........ But not a single source to refute what NOAA states?

I guess if you think satellites were measuring temperatures in 1900, who are we to argue with the insane?

 

[westwall]

I'll take the NOAA's word over posters who are just making poltical statements.

Oh konradv,

You're my hero!!! Below you will find the original NOAA webpage that used to be up till about three weeks before the Copenhagen meetings.

JetStream - An Online Weather School Learning Lesson: Go with the Flow

They removed it and replaced it with the page below which is the current page they are running. Do you need any more proof that NOAA has been compromised by the politics of the AGW conspiricy?


NWS JetStream Learning Lesson: Its a Gas, Man