USMB Groypers Unite!

[Kyrion]

who really cares though? all your arguments are petty. No one owns the extremes in their respective political party. The average working Democrat or Republican citizen can hardly control or own what the radical communists or white supremicists who inhabit this country think.

You should. An elected republican official is calling Tyler a republican. Shouldn't that be a big deal to you, a republican?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Can we all agree that we are all human beings and capable of making mistakes? I can, and I am on record here of admitting it when I am proven wrong. Even if and when I prove it to myself.

There's so much passion, insistence, strength, and conviction by many of those on the left here at USMB, who think the shooter (Tyler Robinson) was a "groyper" and not a leftist, transgender, liberal, etc. . . It has me doubting all of the evidence and statements that we have, so far.

I started a thread for everyone to share posts of anyone found to be celebrating, exhibiting joy, and or relief for Charlie Kirk's murder and so far, all of the videos, comments, tik toks, etc have been of those on the left. Tran's, Non Binaries, and the like.

So, this thread is for all those who think Tyler Robinson was a GROYPER to post videos, links, comments, images of actual "Groypers" celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk in any way.

Buried deep in this video (52:30) Nick Fuentes, so called leader of the "Groyper" movement totally condemns the murder of Charlie Kirk.

I will not associate myself with Nick Fuentes. But when he's condemning it, not all assertions about him can be true, can they?

 

[Kyrion]

Show Fuentes or so-called groypers celebrating Kirk’s assassination

It isn't at all surprising that conservatives run away from their own words. Conservatives are cowards, as I've been demostrating all day today.

Meanwhile, in reality, there is a well documented history of Nick Fuentes attacking Kirk and calling for his followers to troll and attack him.

 

[petro]

See, you are a coward. Thanks for admitting to that.

 

[BackAgain]

This means that Nancy Mace should resign from Congress then, right?

Why? For making a mistaken claim?

You’re very stupid as well as ignorant.

If she can be this wrong about something this basic then she has no basis being an elected official. Right?

No. You’re still wrong.

Again, the motives of Nancy Mace is obvious. She knows that Tyler is a republican and stopped her demands for the death penalty because doing so would make her political alliances look bad.

Wrong again. You don’t know what she meant or why she thought to say it.

Either way though, it doesn’t support your claim. Man up, junior.

You said it. You support it. And no appeals to authority or other fallacies. Support your claim with facts.

But you still won’t.

 

[Yarddog]

You should. An elected republican official is calling Tyler a republican. Shouldn't that be a big deal to you, a republican?

whatever Tyler was.. he was a hate filled radicalized person, no doubt motivated by the social media climate.
If you want to call him a Republican or Democrat, it really doesnt matter. Again, he was radicalized and motivated by hate that most Republicans and Democrat citizens do not contain inside themselves.
I think your just one more person on the internet attempting to sensationalize and DIVIDE.
You just get a kick out of it.

 

[Andrew_Jackson_FTW]

It isn't at all surprising that conservatives run away from their own words. Conservatives are cowards, as I've been demostrating all day today.

Meanwhile, in reality, there is a well documented history of Nick Fuentes attacking Kirk and calling for his followers to troll and attack him.

This is really quite simple. There have been Democrats and right wingers like Fuentes who said very critical things about Kirk before he was assassinated, but did not then celebrate his assassination. Ok that is a part of history. Many many popular figures were despised by various people, but those same people who despise those various figures of history who were assassinated, did not celebrate the assassination.


On the other hand, we saw the many videos of lefties and Democrats celebrating the assassination of Kirk. So this is a very straightforward topic. You’re not addressing it. Post the videos of Nik Fuentes or groypers celebrating the assassination of Kirk.

One more chance for you to address the topic. It’s up to you man. It doesn’t really bother me. The whole civilized world knows what’s going on.

 

[Kyrion]

Sure sure , what a stretch that people on the Left who routinely dehumanize Trump and Trump voters and anyone conservative as Nazis, raciscts, existential threats..for years! you name it ...could ever possibly commit an act of violence !

Charlie Kirk was wrongfully portrayed as being virulently anti- gay meanwhile the shooter had a trans boy/girl friend which is much more of a personal motive.

See, even you admit that you are experiencing brain rot and assume without evidence that any criticism of Charlie Kirk must be from the left. Good job!

In addition, Charlie was correctly protrayed as being virulently anti-gay. Which you should be proud of him for that, right? Aren't you conservatives also virulently anti-gay? Hello?

 

[Kyrion]

whatever Tyler was.. he was a hate filled radicalized person, no doubt motivated by the social media climate.
If you want to call him a Republican or Democrat, it really doesnt matter. Again, he was radicalized and motivated by hate that most Republicans and Democrat citizens do not contain inside themselves.
I think your just one more person on the internet attempting to sensationalize and DIVIDE.
You just get a kick out of it.

Yes, weird how social media, which has been made objectively worse by conservatives, is somehow worse as a result.

Totally weird.

 

[Kyrion]

This is really quite simple. There have been Democrats and right wingers like Fuentes who said very critical things about Kirk before he was assassinated, but did not then celebrate his assassination. Ok that is a part of history. Many many popular figures were despised by various people, but those same people who despise those various figures of history who were assassinated, did not celebrate the assassination.


On the other hand, we saw the many videos of lefties and Democrats celebrating the assassination of Kirk. So this is a very straightforward topic. You’re not addressing it. Post the videos of Nik Fuentes or groypers celebrating the assassination of Kirk.

One more chance for you to address the topic. It’s up to you man. It doesn’t really bother me. The whole civilized world knows what’s going on.

Yes, it is that simple. Nick Fuentes is a coward that refuses to own up to his words attacking Charlie Kirk for years. Again, conservatives are cowards that refuse to own up when it counts. This is not at all shocking to anyone paying attention.

 

[petro]

Yes, weird how social media, which has been made objectively worse by conservatives, is somehow worse as a result.

Totally weird.

Weird that you cannot see your part in the bile.

 

[Andrew_Jackson_FTW]

Yes, it is that simple. Nick Fuentes is a coward that refuses to own up to his words attacking Charlie Kirk for years. Again, conservatives are cowards that refuse to own up when it counts. This is not at all shocking to anyone paying attention.

You can make that criticism that’s your opinion ,

To the actual topic …. we have already seen so many lefties on TikTok and other social media celebrating Kirk’s assassination. You simply have not shown that when it comes to Nik Fuentes or “groypers”…. if you can show it.

 

[Kyrion]

Why? For making a mistaken claim?

You’re very stupid as well as ignorant.

No. You’re still wrong.

Wrong again. You don’t know what she meant or why she thought to say it.

Either way though, it doesn’t support your claim. Man up, junior.

You said it. You support it. And no appeals to authority or other fallacies. Support your claim with facts.

But you still won’t.

Which means you are okay with ignorant people being in Congress, by your own admission. Yeesh.

You can do better.

 

[Failzero]

LGBTQPNMF

 

[Kyrion]

Weird that you cannot see your part in the bile.

Honesty is bile to you?

Weird.

 

[Kyrion]

You can make that criticism that’s your opinion ,

To the actual topic …. we have already seen so many lefties on TikTok and other social media celebrating Kirk’s assassination. You simply have not show that when it comes to Nik Fuentes or “groypers”…. if you can show it.

Which means Tyler Robinson is a republican that followed Nick Fuentes. Glad we are in agreement and also how we are in agreement that conservatives are cowards.

I appreciate the honesty.

 

[petro]

Honesty is bile to you?

Weird.

All I see is a noob liar and agitator.

But continue to suck that gas.

 

[Kyrion]

All I see is a noob liar and agitator.

But continue to suck that gas.

So yes, you dislike honesty.

Again, weird. If you don't want to be agitated by the truth then you shouldn't be so sensitive, right?

 

[Yarddog]

See, even you admit that you are experiencing brain rot and assume without evidence that any criticism of Charlie Kirk must be from the left. Good job!

In addition, Charlie was correctly protrayed as being virulently anti-gay. Which you should be proud of him for that, right? Aren't you conservatives also virulently anti-gay? Hello?

He wasnt. He treated them with respect and Ive seen clips of him talking to gays or trans people before.. very kindly. I saw no hatred. There have been lies about him however, like him saying Gays should be stoned to death. Who do you think it is that criticizes president Trump the most? people on the Right or people on the Left? You do realize that Kirk was instrumental in getting Trump elected dont you? So why do you find it fantasy that Trump haters would also go after people like Charlie Kirk or that they might be one in the same?

 

[Failzero]

Tyler was a Far Left Loon whe let a Tranny use Sex to manipulate him