USA loses $150 billion a year through illegal immigrant remitances.

[candycorn]

Yet another reason we have to gain control of the Southern border. We were close to getting it under control during the Trump administration. Now with Biden, the welcome sign is lit, the wall has holes, the border agents have conflicting orders. Yeah it's waaaaaaay fucked up, just the way the Democrats want it.

The United States Loses $150 Billion Annually in Remittances

Many Americans know very little, if anything, about “remittances,” (also known as “remittance payments”) and how they affect the U.S. economy. The term “remittance” refers to money earned in the United States that is transferred to relatives, friends or business associates who are still abroad...

www.fairus.org

The blob didn't fix immigration? Did he fail?

 

[Moonglow]

Yet another reason we have to gain control of the Southern border. We were close to getting it under control during the Trump administration. Now with Biden, the welcome sign is lit, the wall has holes, the border agents have conflicting orders. Yeah it's waaaaaaay fucked up, just the way the Democrats want it.

The United States Loses $150 Billion Annually in Remittances

Many Americans know very little, if anything, about “remittances,” (also known as “remittance payments”) and how they affect the U.S. economy. The term “remittance” refers to money earned in the United States that is transferred to relatives, friends or business associates who are still abroad...

www.fairus.org

The blob didn't fix immigration? Did he fail?

And he never got a check from Mexico for that damn wall...

 

[Indeependent]

Yet another reason we have to gain control of the Southern border. We were close to getting it under control during the Trump administration. Now with Biden, the welcome sign is lit, the wall has holes, the border agents have conflicting orders. Yeah it's waaaaaaay fucked up, just the way the Democrats want it.

The United States Loses $150 Billion Annually in Remittances

Many Americans know very little, if anything, about “remittances,” (also known as “remittance payments”) and how they affect the U.S. economy. The term “remittance” refers to money earned in the United States that is transferred to relatives, friends or business associates who are still abroad...

www.fairus.org

The blob didn't fix immigration? Did he fail?

Tell us why it failed.
That's right!
You don't actually know what happens everyday in the House of Representatives where the money is allocated.

 

[Moonglow]

Mexico only gets 30 billion in remittances that is not the most of the 150 billion. And then the US get's it back from Mexico in drugz to party with...

 

[Shelzin]

How does the US lose it?

Is that a serious question?

Yes.

Well... Healthy economies generally want their money recycled within it's own economy. If instead of sending cash to Mexico for example, you went on a vacation within the US you have helped pay the wages of all those people you bought goods/services for during that vacation. Thus supporting the economy in which the wealth was derived.

If you give that wealth to outside workers, then you strengthen that economy, rather than your own. Unless of course that money is used in another country to buy US goods. Then it could be a wash. Possibly.

 

[Moonglow]

How does the US lose it?

Is that a serious question?

Yes.

Well... Healthy economies generally want their money recycled within it's own economy. If instead of sending cash to Mexico for example, you went on a vacation within the US you have helped pay the wages of all those people you bought goods/services for during that vacation. Thus supporting the economy in which the wealth was derived.

If you give that wealth to outside workers, then you strengthen that economy, rather than your own. Unless of course that money is used in another country to buy US goods. Then it could be a wash. Possibly.

If we had more cash their would be higher inflation and lower value of the currency.

 

[Lastamender]

How does the US lose it?

Is that a serious question?

Yes.

Well... Healthy economies generally want their money recycled within it's own economy. If instead of sending cash to Mexico for example, you went on a vacation within the US you have helped pay the wages of all those people you bought goods/services for during that vacation. Thus supporting the economy in which the wealth was derived.

If you give that wealth to outside workers, then you strengthen that economy, rather than your own. Unless of course that money is used in another country to buy US goods. Then it could be a wash. Possibly.

If we had more cash their would be higher inflation and lower value of the currency.

That is the plan.

 

[Shelzin]

Sending currency out of the nation makes the currency left in the nation more valuable while inflating the exchange rate in the receiving nation and making it worth less.

Well... I guess I understand why Democrats supported NAFTA now.

Edit: That's not fair... Republicans supported it too for a long time. Point is... We were getting fucked from it. But... Hey, more money was going out than coming in. It's a good thing.... Right?

 

[Moonglow]

Sending currency out of the nation makes the currency left in the nation more valuable while inflating the exchange rate in the receiving nation and making it worth less.

Well... I guess I understand why Democrats supported NAFTA now.

Why do Democrats support NAFTA since history proves it was supported by Republicans and implemented by Reagan and Nixon went to China to normalize relations and started the ball rolling on making sure the so called communist in China morphed into a capitalist state to kick our asses with cheap labor because they are still pissed over the Boxer Rebellion, colonialization by Europeans and the Opium Wars...

 

[candycorn]

Yet another reason we have to gain control of the Southern border. We were close to getting it under control during the Trump administration. Now with Biden, the welcome sign is lit, the wall has holes, the border agents have conflicting orders. Yeah it's waaaaaaay fucked up, just the way the Democrats want it.

The United States Loses $150 Billion Annually in Remittances

Many Americans know very little, if anything, about “remittances,” (also known as “remittance payments”) and how they affect the U.S. economy. The term “remittance” refers to money earned in the United States that is transferred to relatives, friends or business associates who are still abroad...

www.fairus.org

The blob didn't fix immigration? Did he fail?

Tell us why it failed.
That's right!
You don't actually know what happens everyday in the House of Representatives where the money is allocated.

The Blob said he'd fix immigration. Apparently it's still broke.
Your
Blob
Failed.

 

[Shelzin]

The Blob said he'd fix immigration. Apparently it's still broke.
Your
Blob
Failed.

That's true. He didn't get it done. Of course... Why didn't he get it done?

 

[candycorn]

How does the US lose it?

Is that a serious question?

Yes.

Well... Healthy economies generally want their money recycled within it's own economy. If instead of sending cash to Mexico for example, you went on a vacation within the US you have helped pay the wages of all those people you bought goods/services for during that vacation. Thus supporting the economy in which the wealth was derived.

If you give that wealth to outside workers, then you strengthen that economy, rather than your own. Unless of course that money is used in another country to buy US goods. Then it could be a wash. Possibly.

Makes you wonder why more conserve-hate-ives are not ragging on Teddy Cruz for going to Cancun instead of Aspen or Breckenridge. Especially since the US Hospitality sector is hurting so badly.

 

[Moonglow]

How does the US lose it?

Is that a serious question?

Yes.

Well... Healthy economies generally want their money recycled within it's own economy. If instead of sending cash to Mexico for example, you went on a vacation within the US you have helped pay the wages of all those people you bought goods/services for during that vacation. Thus supporting the economy in which the wealth was derived.

If you give that wealth to outside workers, then you strengthen that economy, rather than your own. Unless of course that money is used in another country to buy US goods. Then it could be a wash. Possibly.

If we had more cash their would be higher inflation and lower value of the currency.

That is the plan.

And it hurts the receiving country it's rather sinister plus they get use to using our money as the currency of that country which affects their value of their currency due to lack of use.

 

[candycorn]

The Blob said he'd fix immigration. Apparently it's still broke.
Your
Blob
Failed.

That's true. He didn't get it done. Of course... Why didn't he get it done?

Because he didn't want to.

 

[Shelzin]

Why do Democrats support NAFTA since history proves it was supported by Republicans

I got the Edit in before...

and implemented by Reagan and Nixon went to China to normalize relations and started the ball rolling on making sure the so called communist in China morphed into a capitalist state to kick our asses with cheap labor because they are still pissed over the Boxer Rebellion, colonialization by Europeans and the Opium Wars...

But... More money will be going to China than what's coming back from China. That's good... Right?

 

[Shelzin]

The Blob said he'd fix immigration. Apparently it's still broke.
Your
Blob
Failed.

That's true. He didn't get it done. Of course... Why didn't he get it done?

Because he didn't want to.

Oh? I guess the MSM was wrong then. The opposition parties weren't a factor at all. lol

 

[Lastamender]

How does the US lose it?

Is that a serious question?

Yes.

Well... Healthy economies generally want their money recycled within it's own economy. If instead of sending cash to Mexico for example, you went on a vacation within the US you have helped pay the wages of all those people you bought goods/services for during that vacation. Thus supporting the economy in which the wealth was derived.

If you give that wealth to outside workers, then you strengthen that economy, rather than your own. Unless of course that money is used in another country to buy US goods. Then it could be a wash. Possibly.

If we had more cash their would be higher inflation and lower value of the currency.

That is the plan.

And it hurts the receiving country it's rather sinister plus they get use to using our money as the currency of that country which affects their value of their currency due to lack of use.

None of it benefits Americans. What part of that don't you get?

 

[candycorn]

The Blob said he'd fix immigration. Apparently it's still broke.
Your
Blob
Failed.

That's true. He didn't get it done. Of course... Why didn't he get it done?

Because he didn't want to.

Oh? I guess the MSM was wrong then. The opposition parties weren't a factor at all. lol

For 2 years, he had a majority in both houses and the Oval office.

 

[Shelzin]

Makes you wonder why more conserve-hate-ives are not ragging on Teddy Cruz for going to Cancun instead of Aspen or Breckenridge. Especially since the US Hospitality sector is hurting so badly.

Well... I can't and won't speak for others on the topic... But I really didn't care how much someone golfed or where they took their vacations. I'm not sure if Aspen or Breckenridge was open in which to take a vacation though, might have been a factor in the decision making.

 

[Shelzin]

The Blob said he'd fix immigration. Apparently it's still broke.
Your
Blob
Failed.

That's true. He didn't get it done. Of course... Why didn't he get it done?

Because he didn't want to.

Oh? I guess the MSM was wrong then. The opposition parties weren't a factor at all. lol

For 2 years, he had a majority in both houses and the Oval office.

The opposition parties weren't a factor at all.

It's plural for a reason. I know you want to call Trump a republican. I get it. But he's not. Never really was.