US Soldiers NOT Allowed To Defend US Borders From Foreign Enemies

[OldLady]

No, they can't shoot unarmed civilians. So sorry about that.

No but they absolutely ought to be wiping out foreign troops who point weapons at them inside our border.

They should also be using some of the less lethal means of crowd control to dissipate hordes of illegals trying to breech barriers.

foreign troops who point weapons at them inside our border.
What are you talking about, Pete?

what is it you don't understand?

What foreign troops, as in members of an army, inside our border pointing weapons?

 

[jc456]

No, they can't shoot unarmed civilians. So sorry about that.

No but they absolutely ought to be wiping out foreign troops who point weapons at them inside our border.

They should also be using some of the less lethal means of crowd control to dissipate hordes of illegals trying to breech barriers.

foreign troops who point weapons at them inside our border.
What are you talking about, Pete?

what is it you don't understand?

What foreign troops, as in members of an army, inside our border pointing weapons?

the ones that took the soldiers weapons ones.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Tell that to the handfull of Branch Dividian survivors at Waco who were attacked by tanks and helicopters and poison gas during the Clinton Administration.

They were coming over the border also?

Whoa. I totally misread the Waco situation.

 

[OldLady]

No, they can't shoot unarmed civilians. So sorry about that.

No but they absolutely ought to be wiping out foreign troops who point weapons at them inside our border.

They should also be using some of the less lethal means of crowd control to dissipate hordes of illegals trying to breech barriers.

foreign troops who point weapons at them inside our border.
What are you talking about, Pete?

what is it you don't understand?

What foreign troops, as in members of an army, inside our border pointing weapons?

the ones that took the soldiers weapons ones.

Two of our soldiers over two months ago were briefly detained, probably over mixed up territory lines? No one was hurt. Let's kill some unarmed civilians over it.

 

[jc456]

No but they absolutely ought to be wiping out foreign troops who point weapons at them inside our border.

They should also be using some of the less lethal means of crowd control to dissipate hordes of illegals trying to breech barriers.

foreign troops who point weapons at them inside our border.
What are you talking about, Pete?

what is it you don't understand?

What foreign troops, as in members of an army, inside our border pointing weapons?

the ones that took the soldiers weapons ones.

Two of our soldiers over two months ago were briefly detained, probably over mixed up territory lines? No one was hurt. Let's kill some unarmed civilians over it.

what unarmed civilians? I just told you the men had weapons. are you still spinning?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

'Does the United States military exist only to defend the borders of foreign countries in the Middle East or is it allowed to defend the borders of the U.S. against terrorist cartels, espionage, infiltrations, and smuggling?'

Sound like a stupid question? Here's one that's going to sound even MORE stupid:

Do US military troops have the right to DEFED THEMSELVES in their own country, on their own die of the border, when approached by foreign troops who order them to surrender their weapons?

According to a NorthCom spokesman, the military troops are there NOT in a Law Enforcement capacity.
-- Well, NO SHIT! The US military is used for the defense of the United States...and since there is an illegal invasion going on right now, why can't they be accepted as being there to protect this nation during this 'invasion'?


Military's mission doesn't include enforcement, so smugglers cross Rio Grande right in front of them

Well, shit....someone check to see if the people in hell are cold....I agree with the Easy.

The idea that border defense is a "law enforcement" issue is fucking stupid. What more basic function does a military have other than to defend the nation.

The military should defend the border and let the BP and ICE deal with anyone that might get past them.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Tell that to the handfull of Branch Dividian survivors at Waco who were attacked by tanks and helicopters and poison gas during the Clinton Administration.

none of which were part of the military.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

'Does the United States military exist only to defend the borders of foreign countries in the Middle East or is it allowed to defend the borders of the U.S. against terrorist cartels, espionage, infiltrations, and smuggling?'

Sound like a stupid question? Here's one that's going to sound even MORE stupid:

Do US military troops have the right to DEFED THEMSELVES in their own country, on their own die of the border, when approached by foreign troops who order them to surrender their weapons?

According to a NorthCom spokesman, the military troops are there NOT in a Law Enforcement capacity.
-- Well, NO SHIT! The US military is used for the defense of the United States...and since there is an illegal invasion going on right now, why can't they be accepted as being there to protect this nation during this 'invasion'?


Military's mission doesn't include enforcement, so smugglers cross Rio Grande right in front of them

No, they can't shoot unarmed civilians. So sorry about that.

One standard for Goyim being unable to defend the border of the USA, another standard for Chosen AKA shooting unarmed people at their border.

 

[Pete7469]

What foreign troops, as in members of an army, inside our border pointing weapons?

Mexican troops disarmed American soldiers on US side of the border

 

[Pete7469]

Two of our soldiers over two months ago were briefly detained, probably over mixed up territory lines? No one was hurt. Let's kill some unarmed civilians over it.

Or lets kill some mexican soldiers who were probably running security for the cartel.

 

[Kilroy2]

Illegal invasion is nothing more than stretching the meaning or relating to a military invasion.

Military invasion is clearly defined as enemy troops

You can use invasion like invasion of privacy does really mean the same as military invasion ,

Summer or winter resorts have an invasion of people when a bunch of people show up for an event or the watch the leaves turn brown.

Applying illegal invasion and them implying that it is a military invasion is just padding an argument using unrelated terms.

If us want to say that it is illegal that they want to come to the US then say it.

If the military see someone crossing the border all they need to do is keep a tabs on their position and call in the border patrol

I would imagine standing there watching them would probably be deterrent enough

There is a border patrol and that is there job, if there are not enough people then hire more people.

 

[Auld Phart]

Not their job to round up women and children and nonviolent immigrants

Oaths of Enlistment and Oaths of Office - U.S. Army Center of Military History


"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

Not the job of the military in the constitution

No?

do military personnel take the above oath?

Do our elected representatives take a similar oath?

What does the Constitution say the job of the military is?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

US military cannot be used to enforce laws. The procedure would be to recognize the invasion as an invasion and proceed under the Insurrection Act.

 

[Moonglow]

My, my when has the military been so overwhelmed by unarmed people?

 

[easyt65]

We are not being invaded. Illegal immigrants are not our enemies

100,000 (ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND) CRIMINAL ILLEGALS PER MONTH - ILLEGALLY CROSSING OUR BORDERS IN VIOLATION OF EXISTING US IMMIGRATION LAW - 'stealing' (being rewarded with) approx $200 Billion from the US Govt / taxpayers every year, while American citizens go hungry / homeless...

Those crossing the border include human / sex traffickers, Drug Cartel Members, violent MS13 members, the Mexican Military, pedophiles, rapists, thieves, murderers / cop killers....

...and we are not being invaded?

The next time someone breaks into your house to take money / valuables ... if they happen to rape your wife or daughter ... If they happen to kill one of your family members....

... put the damn phone down / gun down ... Instead of calling the cops or shooting them, make them a f*ing sandwich, empty out your wallet / safes and give them the cash, & then instead of having them arrested let them loose into the neighborhood....

Just remind yourself:

YOU ARE NOT BEING INVADED...THEY ARE NOT YOUR ENEMIES!

 

[22lcidw]

Tell that to the handfull of Branch Dividian survivors at Waco who were attacked by tanks and helicopters and poison gas during the Clinton Administration.

They were coming over the border also?

Wrong president and administration!

 

[easyt65]

It was a MASSIVE failure of leadership and / or govt in telling the military it could not defend the nation by defending the border and telling them they could NOT defend themselves....

When a foreign military approached US military troops and demanded the US military SURRENDER AND HAND OVER THEIR WEAPONS ... ON US SOIL ... AND THE MILITARY DID IT ... IT WAS A SAD F*ING DAY FOR THIS COUNTRY & THE US MILITARY!

The US troops should have immediately demanded the Mexican Military surrender and hand over THEIR weapons...and if they refused to do so the US troops should have LIT THEM UP!

I bet those Mexican troops are still telling their buddies the story of how they invaded the US and got the US military to surrender and hand over their weapons without a fight...and the Mexican military / their buddies are laughing their asses off...

 

[Correll]

'Does the United States military exist only to defend the borders of foreign countries in the Middle East or is it allowed to defend the borders of the U.S. against terrorist cartels, espionage, infiltrations, and smuggling?'

Sound like a stupid question? Here's one that's going to sound even MORE stupid:

Do US military troops have the right to DEFED THEMSELVES in their own country, on their own die of the border, when approached by foreign troops who order them to surrender their weapons?

According to a NorthCom spokesman, the military troops are there NOT in a Law Enforcement capacity.
-- Well, NO SHIT! The US military is used for the defense of the United States...and since there is an illegal invasion going on right now, why can't they be accepted as being there to protect this nation during this 'invasion'?


Military's mission doesn't include enforcement, so smugglers cross Rio Grande right in front of them

No, they can't shoot unarmed civilians. So sorry about that.

What level of force would you support, in the defense of our border?

 

[Correll]

Not their job to round up women and children and nonviolent immigrants

What limits would you support, on Third World Immigration?

 

[busybee01]

US military cannot be used to enforce laws. The procedure would be to recognize the invasion as an invasion and proceed under the Insurrection Act.

In which Trump seizes power like a banana republic dictator.