Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
" Ridiculous Mentality Wondering Why None Takes Them Seriously "
* Get Real Clown *
Enthusiasm would mean actually encouraging people to get abortions...... .Morally bankrupt democrats want to promote the idea that their fabricated class warfare justifies their soulless enthusiasm for abortion. Disgusting and inhuman.
Morally bankrupt democrats want to promote the idea that their fabricated class warfare justifies their soulless enthusiasm for abortion. Disgusting and inhuman.
tell that to all the caged post born kiddies down at the border.
or the post born who go hungry every night.
Who Built the Cages, Joe?
Obama. And since he always takes credit for events while he was VP, Joe. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/baracks-ice-chief-cages-were-obamas-ideawww.usmessageboard.com
lol .... unaccompanied minors are not babies in diapers. & they weren't detained for more than a few days per the law.
Washington Examiner
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.
Share:
RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.
Washington Examiner - Media Bias/Fact Check
lol.... next?
.
PolitiFact Media Bias Rating
Learn the AllSides Media Bias Rating of PolitiFact. AllSides rates the media bias of hundreds of news outlets, media sources and writers.www.allsides.com
Yep .... so much for all the ' smaller less intrusive gov'ment' rhetoric if it involves a females' innards or who people love.
Even the most ardent of "small government" Conservatives will agree that the government has a legitimate role to play in protecting the lives and rights of children who can not speak for, nor defend themselves.
playtime is such a bitch, the way she pretends that there is no other perspective than her own.
^^^ most ironic post today ^^^
I address differences of opinion and/or policy. I don't pretend that they don't exist, like you just did, you brainless moron.
bullshit.
my point stands.
You pretended that your position on abortion was the only possible position, and then judged other based on your closed mind, ignoring their completely valid perspectives.
That was you being an asshole.
I don't do that to you.
Yep .... so much for all the ' smaller less intrusive gov'ment' rhetoric if it involves a females' innards or who people love.
Even the most ardent of "small government" Conservatives will agree that the government has a legitimate role to play in protecting the lives and rights of children who can not speak for, nor defend themselves.
playtime is such a bitch, the way she pretends that there is no other perspective than her own.
^^^ most ironic post today ^^^
I address differences of opinion and/or policy. I don't pretend that they don't exist, like you just did, you brainless moron.
bullshit.
my point stands.
You pretended that your position on abortion was the only possible position, and then judged other based on your closed mind, ignoring their completely valid perspectives.
That was you being an asshole.
I don't do that to you.
when it comes to abortion - there IS only one position possible.
a woman should have full autonomy.
any other position is NOT valid, because there can only be one final decision.
you think someone else should be able to tell YOU what you can do with your body? any part of it?
to hell you don't do that -
'my point stands ' is yer M.O.
Yep .... so much for all the ' smaller less intrusive gov'ment' rhetoric if it involves a females' innards or who people love.
Even the most ardent of "small government" Conservatives will agree that the government has a legitimate role to play in protecting the lives and rights of children who can not speak for, nor defend themselves.
playtime is such a bitch, the way she pretends that there is no other perspective than her own.
^^^ most ironic post today ^^^
I address differences of opinion and/or policy. I don't pretend that they don't exist, like you just did, you brainless moron.
bullshit.
my point stands.
You pretended that your position on abortion was the only possible position, and then judged other based on your closed mind, ignoring their completely valid perspectives.
That was you being an asshole.
I don't do that to you.
when it comes to abortion - there IS only one position possible.
a woman should have full autonomy.
any other position is NOT valid, because there can only be one final decision.
you think someone else should be able to tell YOU what you can do with your body? any part of it?
to hell you don't do that -
'my point stands ' is yer M.O.
People tell me what I can or can't do with "my body" all the time, especially when it is involves another person's body also.
Did you really not know that? Are you stupid? Blinded by ideology?
Yep .... so much for all the ' smaller less intrusive gov'ment' rhetoric if it involves a females' innards or who people love.
Even the most ardent of "small government" Conservatives will agree that the government has a legitimate role to play in protecting the lives and rights of children who can not speak for, nor defend themselves.
playtime is such a bitch, the way she pretends that there is no other perspective than her own.
^^^ most ironic post today ^^^
I address differences of opinion and/or policy. I don't pretend that they don't exist, like you just did, you brainless moron.
bullshit.
my point stands.
You pretended that your position on abortion was the only possible position, and then judged other based on your closed mind, ignoring their completely valid perspectives.
That was you being an asshole.
I don't do that to you.
when it comes to abortion - there IS only one position possible.
a woman should have full autonomy.
any other position is NOT valid, because there can only be one final decision.
you think someone else should be able to tell YOU what you can do with your body? any part of it?
to hell you don't do that -
'my point stands ' is yer M.O.
People tell me what I can or can't do with "my body" all the time, especially when it is involves another person's body also.
Did you really not know that? Are you stupid? Blinded by ideology?
are you stupid enough to think i meant the false equivalency of not sticking a needle in yer arm or tweaking on a pipe to say uhhhhh....
not being allowed to get a vasectomy when you want one?
god damn... how'z about throwing yer ass in jail if you do get one against the deep state orders that you can't?
Yep .... so much for all the ' smaller less intrusive gov'ment' rhetoric if it involves a females' innards or who people love.
Even the most ardent of "small government" Conservatives will agree that the government has a legitimate role to play in protecting the lives and rights of children who can not speak for, nor defend themselves.
playtime is such a bitch, the way she pretends that there is no other perspective than her own.
^^^ most ironic post today ^^^
I address differences of opinion and/or policy. I don't pretend that they don't exist, like you just did, you brainless moron.
bullshit.
my point stands.
You pretended that your position on abortion was the only possible position, and then judged other based on your closed mind, ignoring their completely valid perspectives.
That was you being an asshole.
I don't do that to you.
when it comes to abortion - there IS only one position possible.
a woman should have full autonomy.
any other position is NOT valid, because there can only be one final decision.
you think someone else should be able to tell YOU what you can do with your body? any part of it?
to hell you don't do that -
'my point stands ' is yer M.O.
People tell me what I can or can't do with "my body" all the time, especially when it is involves another person's body also.
Did you really not know that? Are you stupid? Blinded by ideology?
are you stupid enough to think i meant the false equivalency of not sticking a needle in yer arm or tweaking on a pipe to say uhhhhh....
not being allowed to get a vasectomy when you want one?
god damn... how'z about throwing yer ass in jail if you do get one against the deep state orders that you can't?
I understand perfectly what you meant. You made a the claim that a person should have complete autonomy over their own body. Actually you said "woman" but I don't see what gender has to do with your point.
My point is that when what a person wants to do with their body, impacts on another person's body, society makes laws.
I was not thinking of drugs. I was actually thinking of the young and attractive woman I saw last night, very sexily dressed. I would have liked to see what was under her top. But that would have impacted HER body and her rights and would have been wrong. Morally and LEGALLY.
Thus rules against it. Which I fully support. Even though it undermines my "autonomy".
(i'm assuming that she would not been willing to show an middle aged guy of her own free will. Though I have been taking pretty good care of myself recently so...well, I digress)
Yep .... so much for all the ' smaller less intrusive gov'ment' rhetoric if it involves a females' innards or who people love.
Even the most ardent of "small government" Conservatives will agree that the government has a legitimate role to play in protecting the lives and rights of children who can not speak for, nor defend themselves.
playtime is such a bitch, the way she pretends that there is no other perspective than her own.
^^^ most ironic post today ^^^
I address differences of opinion and/or policy. I don't pretend that they don't exist, like you just did, you brainless moron.
bullshit.
my point stands.
You pretended that your position on abortion was the only possible position, and then judged other based on your closed mind, ignoring their completely valid perspectives.
That was you being an asshole.
I don't do that to you.
when it comes to abortion - there IS only one position possible.
a woman should have full autonomy.
any other position is NOT valid, because there can only be one final decision.
you think someone else should be able to tell YOU what you can do with your body? any part of it?
to hell you don't do that -
'my point stands ' is yer M.O.
People tell me what I can or can't do with "my body" all the time, especially when it is involves another person's body also.
Did you really not know that? Are you stupid? Blinded by ideology?
are you stupid enough to think i meant the false equivalency of not sticking a needle in yer arm or tweaking on a pipe to say uhhhhh....
not being allowed to get a vasectomy when you want one?
god damn... how'z about throwing yer ass in jail if you do get one against the deep state orders that you can't?
I understand perfectly what you meant. You made a the claim that a person should have complete autonomy over their own body. Actually you said "woman" but I don't see what gender has to do with your point.
My point is that when what a person wants to do with their body, impacts on another person's body, society makes laws.
I was not thinking of drugs. I was actually thinking of the young and attractive woman I saw last night, very sexily dressed. I would have liked to see what was under her top. But that would have impacted HER body and her rights and would have been wrong. Morally and LEGALLY.
Thus rules against it. Which I fully support. Even though it undermines my "autonomy".
(i'm assuming that she would not been willing to show an middle aged guy of her own free will. Though I have been taking pretty good care of myself recently so...well, I digress)
i said 'woman' because the discussion is about abortion.
drugs impact society & are detrimental to society as a whole.
a personal & final decision to end a pregnancy is not.
if anything, it's the opposite if you wanna consider poverty & child abuse as a mitigating factor in households where children aren't wanted.
& adopting out is definitely a possible psychological detriment to the WOMAN forced to carry for 9 months.
Then you wouldn't really have any standing in the argument, would you?It would be medically impossible for me to be in the position...If you don't want an abortion, don't have one.Standing up for the lives of the unborn that can not defend themselves is honorable.
Then you wouldn't really have any standing in the argument, would you?It would be medically impossible for me to be in the position...If you don't want an abortion, don't have one.Standing up for the lives of the unborn that can not defend themselves is honorable.
Oh there is standing there....Look, If I am the male in the fight to save the unborn life that I helped create, then, while true that the woman has to carry the child, it is the father that will be supporting that child...So, do I have a say? You're damned right I do...
If killing off a race is racism , them miscegenation is a pretty good start
US signs anti-abortion declaration with group of largely authoritarian governments
Move is part of a campaign by Trump administration to reorient US foreign policy in a more socially conservative directionwww.theguardian.com
The “core supporters” of the declaration are Brazil, Egypt, Hungary, Indonesia and Uganda, and the 27 other signatories include Belarus (where security forces are currently trying to suppress a women-led protest movement), Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Sudan, South Sudan, Libya.
Most of the signatories are among the 20 worst countries to be a woman according to the Women, Peace and Security Index established by Georgetown University.
The list of Americas new friends must make sobering reading. Not to worry. In a fortnight President Joe will consign this to the bin.
Surely, there is no other human right that is as basic and as essential as the right not to be summarily put to death for no better reason that that one's existence is an inconvenience to someone else.
Anyone who defends a “right” to kill innocent children in cold blood completely forfeits any credibility in claiming any concern for human rights or human life. Abortion is one of the most heinous and inexcusable human rights violations taking place in the world these days.
Then you wouldn't really have any standing in the argument, would you?It would be medically impossible for me to be in the position...If you don't want an abortion, don't have one.Standing up for the lives of the unborn that can not defend themselves is honorable.
Oh there is standing there....Look, If I am the male in the fight to save the unborn life that I helped create, then, while true that the woman has to carry the child, it is the father that will be supporting that child...So, do I have a say? You're damned right I do...
Well, you should. But legally speaking right now, you don't.
Half the responsibility, zero control. Welcome to the Patriarchy.
View attachment 406463
No you dont. You should be more responsible about who you are fucking.Then you wouldn't really have any standing in the argument, would you?It would be medically impossible for me to be in the position...If you don't want an abortion, don't have one.Standing up for the lives of the unborn that can not defend themselves is honorable.
Oh there is standing there....Look, If I am the male in the fight to save the unborn life that I helped create, then, while true that the woman has to carry the child, it is the father that will be supporting that child...So, do I have a say? You're damned right I do...
No you dont. You should be more responsible about who you are fucking.Then you wouldn't really have any standing in the argument, would you?It would be medically impossible for me to be in the position...If you don't want an abortion, don't have one.Standing up for the lives of the unborn that can not defend themselves is honorable.
Oh there is standing there....Look, If I am the male in the fight to save the unborn life that I helped create, then, while true that the woman has to carry the child, it is the father that will be supporting that child...So, do I have a say? You're damned right I do...
No you dont. You should be more responsible about who you are fucking.Then you wouldn't really have any standing in the argument, would you?It would be medically impossible for me to be in the position...If you don't want an abortion, don't have one.Standing up for the lives of the unborn that can not defend themselves is honorable.
Oh there is standing there....Look, If I am the male in the fight to save the unborn life that I helped create, then, while true that the woman has to carry the child, it is the father that will be supporting that child...So, do I have a say? You're damned right I do...
The definition of a person according to us statute does not include a fetus .My point is that when what a person wants to do with their body, impacts on another person's body, society makes laws.
The man provided his sperm freely and the fetus is private property of the mother by virtue of possession .So, all the responsibility is on the man, and none on the woman?
