US gun culture is 'corrupting the world,' Australia ex-deputy PM says after slaying

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

And a rather nice avatar at that! Got to love Texas...

-Geaux.

Yeah, except that woman is in Wisconsin and the photo is from a soft-porn site. Tsk. TinyDancer just doesn't want to be taken seriously.

Hot Wisconsin Country Girls | LosersBracket.com

You've got to be kidding me.



haven't you seen all my other avatars? I've gone from cowgirl/some of my faves fantasy/warrior women/gypsy women/oh and my favorite belly dancers you name it.

Its the mood I'm in. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Obviously those others weren't working for you so you got some butt cheeks from a porn site.

 

[WillowTree]

Here's an idea.

Let's send Australia a contingent of our black thugs, keep guns away from them and see what happens!

Call it a social experiment.

Let's send the crips and the bloods and the entire population of chicago.

 

[kidrocks]

You must be one of those "compassionate conservatives" I used to hear about. **** yeah, screw the little children.

Why do we as adults need to worry about protecting their useless little asses?

They don't pay taxes! They can't get a job! Too young to go fight in any of our manufactured wars!

Spot on, dude.

Just remember: It's YOUR side that wants children to be protected with nothing more than a "gun-free zone" sign.

Historically, how has that worked out?

They worked exactly as it was intended:

.

Thank God it's a gun-free zone. For the minute we have to arm our teachers and staff at public schools in America... we've lost. Keep schools gun free... please!

 

[JohnL.Burke]

When it doesn't seem like you're getting enough attention here, or you simply can't connect dots to a coherent post, put up an avatar of a woman's ass. That ought to work.

Works for me.

I bet it does. And Sarah Palin knows it too.

I WISH Sarah Palin dressed like this. Instead, I get Hillary in a pantsuit screaming "What does it matter" while talking about what happened in Benghazi. Talk about a slice of incompetent shrew with a side order of salt peter!

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Just remember: It's YOUR side that wants children to be protected with nothing more than a "gun-free zone" sign.

Historically, how has that worked out?

Oh, but you're wrong. I think somewhere out there, oh Gallup or somebody, blew a number around 90% of those who want expanded background checks.

Nobody "on my side" just wants a damn sign nailed to a wall. You're just flat ******* lying about that. Or else you could post a link to corroborate your bullshit.

The Fix90-percent-of-americans-want-expanded-background-checks-on-guns-why-isnt-this-a-political-slam-dunk/

Where's your link?

Ask Amanda Collins what happens when one is not allowed to carry a legally owned firearm on campus..

-Geaux

CAMPUS RAPE VICTIM SAYS GUN-FREE ZONES EMPOWER CRIMINALS, DEFENDS CONCEALED CARRY

Campus Rape Victim Says Gun-Free Zones Empower Criminals, Defends Concealed Carry | Video | TheBlaze.com

In her own experience, Collins said she knew something was wrong the moment her attacker grabbed her from behind. Tragically, she was raped at gun point, in a gun-free zone, less than 100 feet away from campus authorities. The assailant went on to assault two other women and to kill a third.

“Had I been carrying that night, two other rapes would have been prevented and a young life would have been saved,” Collins said, defending students’ right to carry weapons on campus.

While the young woman had a licence to carry, it was illegal for her to have a gun on campus.

[youtube]0t5BTl6m7Kk[/youtube]

Thank you for that single woman's story.

So what part of 90% of Americans want expanded background checks do you not get?

 

[R.C. Christian]

Almost certainly true.

But with people like you as the mindless pawns of militarism, it is quite likely that, in the future, you will not see a United States at all.

.

I know you hate death sticks dude. That's cool, but most of the people in this country don't own guns because they're "mindless pawns of militarism". Some surely do but most people with rifles just use them in a sporting manner. Some hunt, some shoot. Very few long rifles are involved in the crimes you read about. Usually handguns are the gun of murderers and, FWIW, I really don't care for hand guns too much. Where I live I have to contend with all kinds of dangers that police could never respond to in time to save me. Those dangers are due to the fact that I live in a big country with a lot things that bite, plus lot crazy people high on meth and god knows what else. Worse yet, this nation is in it's death throes so when it goes down, I'm better off with having a death stick than not. I say this because I have a daughter. I hope you can respect this.

I'm betting he can't.

Irrational gun-haters want people to be unable to protect themselves from criminals. They have as yet not explained why.

If you've ever spent any time in Europe then you'd see that most of them have similar opinions, although and English gentleman gave me a Webley revolver to smuggle out back in 95. He just couldn't bear to turn it in.

 

[Contumacious]

Just remember: It's YOUR side that wants children to be protected with nothing more than a "gun-free zone" sign.

Historically, how has that worked out?

They worked exactly as it was intended:

.

Thank God it's a gun-free zone. For the minute we have to arm our teachers and staff at public schools in America... we've lost. Keep schools gun free... please!

I see, so arming the teachers and the staff IS the loss - from your standpoint , dead children are not a loss


Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Who would have thunketh?

.

 

[numan]

I'm not worried. You will never see a disarmed United States

Almost certainly true.

But with people like you as the mindless pawns of militarism, it is quite likely that, in the future, you will not see a United States at all.

I know you hate death sticks dude. That's cool, but most of the people in this country don't own guns because they're "mindless pawns of militarism". Some surely do but most people with rifles just use them in a sporting manner. Some hunt, some shoot. Very few long rifles are involved in the crimes you read about. Usually handguns are the gun of murderers and, FWIW, I really don't care for hand guns too much. Where I live I have to contend with all kinds of dangers that police could never respond to in time to save me. Those dangers are due to the fact that I live in a big country with a lot things that bite, plus lot crazy people high on meth and god knows what else. Worse yet, this nation is in it's death throes so when it goes down, I'm better off with having a death stick than not. I say this because I have a daughter. I hope you can respect this.

I have nothing against sensible people having guns for sensible purposes.

However, a high proportion of Americans are anything but sensible -- they are mentally defective, ignorant, brainwashed zombies, and many are always close to mania and hysteria. Emotional maturity has never been highly valued in the Land of the Free.

In such a country, with such a population, and awash with death-dealing instruments, in the grip of militaristic propaganda and war-profiteers, and governed by an imbecilic constitutional system -- the prognosis for long-term survival is not good.

As I wrote elsewhere:

Civilized people in civilized countries do not need guns.

The real question is: Is there any possibility that Americans can ever become civilized?

Obviously a rhetorical question.
.

 

[Geaux4it]

Oh, but you're wrong. I think somewhere out there, oh Gallup or somebody, blew a number around 90% of those who want expanded background checks.

Nobody "on my side" just wants a damn sign nailed to a wall. You're just flat ******* lying about that. Or else you could post a link to corroborate your bullshit.

The Fix90-percent-of-americans-want-expanded-background-checks-on-guns-why-isnt-this-a-political-slam-dunk/

Where's your link?

Ask Amanda Collins what happens when one is not allowed to carry a legally owned firearm on campus..

-Geaux

CAMPUS RAPE VICTIM SAYS GUN-FREE ZONES EMPOWER CRIMINALS, DEFENDS CONCEALED CARRY

Campus Rape Victim Says Gun-Free Zones Empower Criminals, Defends Concealed Carry | Video | TheBlaze.com

In her own experience, Collins said she knew something was wrong the moment her attacker grabbed her from behind. Tragically, she was raped at gun point, in a gun-free zone, less than 100 feet away from campus authorities. The assailant went on to assault two other women and to kill a third.

“Had I been carrying that night, two other rapes would have been prevented and a young life would have been saved,” Collins said, defending students’ right to carry weapons on campus.

While the young woman had a licence to carry, it was illegal for her to have a gun on campus.

[youtube]0t5BTl6m7Kk[/youtube]

Thank you for that single woman's story.

So what part of 90% of Americans want expanded background checks do you not get?

Single woman's story? 3 others raped and one murdered because she did not have her CCW with her

51% of the people wanted Obummer for POTUS and got it. 90% of the people want background checks and got it shoved up their arse?

Does not compute

-Geaux

 

[The T]

When it doesn't seem like you're getting enough attention here, or you simply can't connect dots to a coherent post, put up an avatar of a woman's ass. That ought to work.

When you can't counter an argument with facts and logic, insist your opponents are scared and bring up race.

That never works, but it doesn't stop you from trying.

You obviously haven't read very many of my posts.

And the temptation to wave obvious racism in the faces of the scared white people on this board is irresistible.

Fact is? WE HAVE. And call you out on it.

 

[tinydancer]

You must be one of those "compassionate conservatives" I used to hear about. **** yeah, screw the little children.

Why do we as adults need to worry about protecting their useless little asses?

They don't pay taxes! They can't get a job! Too young to go fight in any of our manufactured wars!

Spot on, dude.

Just remember: It's YOUR side that wants children to be protected with nothing more than a "gun-free zone" sign.

Historically, how has that worked out?

Oh, but you're wrong. I think somewhere out there, oh Gallup or somebody, blew a number around 90% of those who want expanded background checks.

Nobody "on my side" just wants a damn sign nailed to a wall. You're just flat ******* lying about that. Or else you could post a link to corroborate your bullshit.

The Fix90-percent-of-americans-want-expanded-background-checks-on-guns-why-isnt-this-a-political-slam-dunk/

Where's your link?

David Gregory.

 

[Contumacious]

I have nothing against sensible people having guns for sensible purposes.

However, a high proportion of Americans are anything but sensible -- they are mentally defective, ignorant, brainwashed zombies, and many are always close to mania and hysteria. Emotional maturity has never been highly valued in the Land of the Free.

That is true. But you continue to elect them to office and provide those folks with advanced Weapons Of Mass destruction.

Go fig

.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Almost certainly true.

But with people like you as the mindless pawns of militarism, it is quite likely that, in the future, you will not see a United States at all.

I know you hate death sticks dude. That's cool, but most of the people in this country don't own guns because they're "mindless pawns of militarism". Some surely do but most people with rifles just use them in a sporting manner. Some hunt, some shoot. Very few long rifles are involved in the crimes you read about. Usually handguns are the gun of murderers and, FWIW, I really don't care for hand guns too much. Where I live I have to contend with all kinds of dangers that police could never respond to in time to save me. Those dangers are due to the fact that I live in a big country with a lot things that bite, plus lot crazy people high on meth and god knows what else. Worse yet, this nation is in it's death throes so when it goes down, I'm better off with having a death stick than not. I say this because I have a daughter. I hope you can respect this.

I have nothing against sensible people having guns for sensible purposes.

However, a high proportion of Americans are anything but sensible -- they are mentally defective, ignorant, brainwashed zombies, and many are always close to mania and hysteria. Emotional maturity has never been highly valued in the Land of the Free.

In such a country, with such a population, and awash with death-dealing instruments, in the grip of militaristic propaganda and war-profiteers, and governed by an imbecilic constitutional system -- the prognosis for long-term survival is not good.

As I wrote elsewhere:

Civilized people in civilized countries do not need guns.

The real question is: Is there any possibility that Americans can ever become civilized?

Obviously a rhetorical question.
.

However, a high proportion of Americans are anything but sensible -- they are mentally defective, ignorant, brainwashed zombies, and many are always close to mania and hysteria. Emotional maturity has never been highly valued in the Land of the Free.

Yes, we have a large Democrat party.

 

[kidrocks]

They worked exactly as it was intended:

.

Thank God it's a gun-free zone. For the minute we have to arm our teachers and staff at public schools in America... we've lost. Keep schools gun free... please!

I see, so arming the teachers and the staff IS the loss - from your standpoint , dead children are not a loss


Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Who would have thunketh?

.

No, what I'm saying is that we have to stoop to heavily arming our schools to protect our children than the gun culture corrupting America has won. What's next? Arming the children? Steel gates? Armed patrols? Police States?

 

[numan]

I have nothing against sensible people having guns for sensible purposes.

However, a high proportion of Americans are anything but sensible -- they are mentally defective, ignorant, brainwashed zombies, and many are always close to mania and hysteria. Emotional maturity has never been highly valued in the Land of the Free.

That is true. But you continue to elect them to office and provide those folks with advanced Weapons Of Mass Destruction.

I certainly do not elect them to office. My votes are always protest votes.

However, you are correct that the low-grade anthropoids who are elected to high office in the USA do not inspire confidence that they are capable of dealing with the problems of the 21st century.
.

 

[AmazonTania]

You must be one of those "compassionate conservatives" I used to hear about. **** yeah, screw the little children.

Why do we as adults need to worry about protecting their useless little asses?

They don't pay taxes! They can't get a job! Too young to go fight in any of our manufactured wars!

Spot on, dude.

Just remember: It's YOUR side that wants children to be protected with nothing more than a "gun-free zone" sign.

Historically, how has that worked out?

Oh, but you're wrong. I think somewhere out there, oh Gallup or somebody, blew a number around 90% of those who want expanded background checks.

Nobody "on my side" just wants a damn sign nailed to a wall. You're just flat ******* lying about that. Or else you could post a link to corroborate your bullshit.

The Fix90-percent-of-americans-want-expanded-background-checks-on-guns-why-isnt-this-a-political-slam-dunk/

Where's your link?

Of course 90% of Americans support background checks. How else can anyone possibly say no to that question without seeming like an irrational, heartless monster.

It's typically like asking, 'Have you beaten your wife today?' How exactly can you answer that question without first acknowledging that you have beaten your wife?

 

[numan]

No, what I'm saying is that we have to stoop to heavily arming our schools to protect our children then the gun culture corrupting America has won.

What's next? Arming the children? Steel gates? Armed patrols? Police States?

That has already happened.

You are way behind the times.
.

 

[Vox]

You don't see mass school shootings? The perp is usually an angry white male armed to the teeth with usually 3 or 4 guns of mass destruction.

Sorry if you think that's dumb.

A mass school shooting, every once in a great while, I'm not letting such a small percentage change my life. You have a greater chance of dying in a car accident. Do you drive? Pretty risky! I hope you don't smoke, drink, chew. If you are overweight, high blood pressure, you are at a high risk. Biking, motorcycling, hiking and type of going out of the house is risky. In fact being shot is not as high in the injury scale as walking down the street and getting randomly shot. If you are murdered, it's like someone you know.

You must be one of those "compassionate conservatives" I used to hear about. **** yeah, screw the little children.

Why do we as adults need to worry about protecting their useless little asses?

They don't pay taxes! They can't get a job! Too young to go fight in any of our manufactured wars!

Spot on, dude.

hey, bleeding heart compassionate libtard, who "really cares" about the little children, do you want to ban swimming pools and bicycles?

 

[Vox]

So what part of 90% of Americans want expanded background checks do you not get?[/B]

it's a lie. more precisely - it is a result of ONE poll at one point of time and it has already diminished extensively


Guns

 

[numan]

So what part of 90% of Americans want expanded background checks do you not get?

it's a lie. more precisely - it is a result of ONE poll at one point of time and it has already diminished extensively

It appears to be all of it that he doesn't get.

.