US, for 1st time in 50 years, experienced negative net migration in 2025

[1srelluc]

MSN

The U.S. experienced negative net migration in 2025 for the first time in at least half a century as a result of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, according to a report released Tuesday by the Brookings Institution.

Although the administration has undertaken aggressive removal efforts, the negative number is mostly due to a significant drop in entries into the U.S., the report said.

Remember when Biden said it would take an act of Congress?

No, it just took someone like Trump with the will to stop it.

 

[konradv]

MSN

The U.S. experienced negative net migration in 2025 for the first time in at least half a century as a result of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, according to a report released Tuesday by the Brookings Institution.

Although the administration has undertaken aggressive removal efforts, the negative number is mostly due to a significant drop in entries into the U.S., the report said.

Remember when Biden said it would take an act of Congress?

No, it just took someone like Trump with the will to stop it.

Can you prove that’s a good thing for a country defined by immigration?

 

[80zephyr]

Can you prove that’s a good thing for a country defined by immigration?

Can you prove its not?

 

[The Duke]

MSN

The U.S. experienced negative net migration in 2025 for the first time in at least half a century as a result of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, according to a report released Tuesday by the Brookings Institution.

Although the administration has undertaken aggressive removal efforts, the negative number is mostly due to a significant drop in entries into the U.S., the report said.

Remember when Biden said it would take an act of Congress?

No, it just took someone like Trump with the will to stop it.

Winning!

 

[Invisibleflash]

MSN

The U.S. experienced negative net migration in 2025 for the first time in at least half a century as a result of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, according to a report released Tuesday by the Brookings Institution.

Although the administration has undertaken aggressive removal efforts, the negative number is mostly due to a significant drop in entries into the U.S., the report said.

Remember when Biden said it would take an act of Congress?

No, it just took someone like Trump with the will to stop it.

It is a start in the right direction.

 

[martybegan]

Can you prove that’s a good thing for a country defined by immigration?

Controlled immigration, not unfettered immigration.

 

[1srelluc]

Can you prove that’s a good thing for a country defined by immigration?

True, it was a good thing in our formative years.

Now we simply don't need them unless they are professionals of some sort.

We certainly don't need those who go on the dole as soon as they get here.

Pretty simple stuff to a sane person.

 

[Winston]

Can you prove its not?

The Effects of Immigration on the United States’ Economy — Penn Wharton Budget Model

While some policymakers have blamed immigration for slowing U.S. wage growth since the 1970s, most academic research finds little long run effect on Americans’ wages. The available evidence suggests that immigration leads to more innovation, a better educated workforce, greater occupational speci

budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu

 

[1srelluc]

The Effects of Immigration on the United States’ Economy — Penn Wharton Budget Model

While some policymakers have blamed immigration for slowing U.S. wage growth since the 1970s, most academic research finds little long run effect on Americans’ wages. The available evidence suggests that immigration leads to more innovation, a better educated workforce, greater occupational speci

budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu

LOL...."academic research".

Yeah, the same bunch that fleeced us with the climate change hoax.

 

[Winston]

LOL...."academic research".

Yeah, the same bunch that fleeced us with the climate change hoax.

What you got? A bunch of internet cowboys. Released yesterday.

Reduced migration will dampen growth in the labor force, consumer spending, and gross domestic product (GDP). We estimate the sustainable pace of monthly job growth to be between 20,000 and 50,000 in late 2025 and believe it could be negative in 2026.

Macroeconomic implications of immigration flows in 2025 and 2026: January 2026 update | Brookings

Wendy Edelberg, Stan Veuger, and Tara Watson review immigration flow trends in 2025 and 2026, and analyze their macroeconomic implications.

www.brookings.edu

 

[konradv]

True, it was a good thing in our formative years.

Now we simply don't need them unless they are professionals of some sort.

We certainly don't need those who go on the dole as soon as they get here.

Pretty simple stuff to a sane person.

More people means more business, means more money.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

More people means more business, means more money.

More welfare, more fraud, more crime.

 

[80zephyr]

What you got? A bunch of internet cowboys. Released yesterday.

Reduced migration will dampen growth in the labor force, consumer spending, and gross domestic product (GDP). We estimate the sustainable pace of monthly job growth to be between 20,000 and 50,000 in late 2025 and believe it could be negative in 2026.

Macroeconomic implications of immigration flows in 2025 and 2026: January 2026 update | Brookings

Wendy Edelberg, Stan Veuger, and Tara Watson review immigration flow trends in 2025 and 2026, and analyze their macroeconomic implications.

www.brookings.edu

Lets try it and find out. After I heard that 75% of Somalis get some kind of government help, I like our chances.

 

[1srelluc]

More people means more business, means more money.

You mean more dem grift streams.....Remember those now defunded NGOs?

 

[Doc7505]

What you got? A bunch of internet cowboys. Released yesterday.

Reduced migration will dampen growth in the labor force, consumer spending, and gross domestic product (GDP). We estimate the sustainable pace of monthly job growth to be between 20,000 and 50,000 in late 2025 and believe it could be negative in 2026.

Macroeconomic implications of immigration flows in 2025 and 2026: January 2026 update | Brookings

Wendy Edelberg, Stan Veuger, and Tara Watson review immigration flow trends in 2025 and 2026, and analyze their macroeconomic implications.

www.brookings.edu

<~~~~~~~~~~>
Is that the reason that it's now necessary sto speak Spanish in the construction business?
Two million down....twenty eight million to go!

 

[The Duke]

You mean more dem grift streams.....Remember those now defunded NGOs?

That our glorious Senate just re-funded? Yeah, apparently they are that big of a dickheads.
I call them traitors. That is bullshit.

 

[1srelluc]

That our glorious Senate just re-funded? Yeah, apparently they are that big of a dickheads.
I call them traitors. That is bullshit.

Huh, I did not hear about that....Link?

 

[The Duke]

Huh, I did not hear about that....Link?

I'd like to help ya, but this is what happened.

 

[1srelluc]

I'd like to help ya, but this is what happened.

The Senate can't fund shit.

Please provide a link stating that the Senate is refunding NGOs.

BTW....Damn, Rubio should rock a beard.

 

[Thinker101]

Can you prove that’s a good thing for a country defined by immigration?

Must be why we have legal immigration....dumbass.